Comparison of collision dynamics of soccer balls with energy dissipation method

Asım Tunçel, Nihat Özgören, Serdar Aritan
{"title":"Comparison of collision dynamics of soccer balls with energy dissipation method","authors":"Asım Tunçel, Nihat Özgören, Serdar Aritan","doi":"10.1177/17543371241237589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to understand the collision characteristics of different soccer balls by determining energy dissipation (ED) during collisions. Soccer balls from five different brands were kicked towards a framed tempered glass. The kicks were performed with the balls inflated under three inner pressure conditions. The motion of each ball was recorded using two high-speed cameras at 6000 Hz. The contact surface area (CSA), ball indentation amount (IA), reaction forces (RF) and energetic coefficient of restitution (CoR) during contact were calculated via image processing methods. A new methodological approach was developed to determine the ED during the collision (EDDC). The accuracy of the estimated RF was validated using force plate data, and the CSA values validated the calculated IA. The EDDC were then reduced to a single value to compare with the CoR values obtained using the traditional formula. Differences between CoR and EDDC were statistically tested. One-way ANOVA tests were performed separately to compare the effect of the ball brand on the IA and EDDC for each inner pressure condition. The CoR and EDDC showed no significant difference, proving that the developed method is a valid measure of ED. At 1.0 bar inner pressure, IA and EDDC showed significant differences according to the brands. EDDC, depending on the ball quality, decreased at higher inner pressure values regardless of the brand. Consequently, the present study exhibited that ball quality becomes a critical factor in collision dynamics at high inner pressure values, considering that ball inner pressure may vary between 0.6 and 1.0 bar in official soccer matches.","PeriodicalId":20674,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology","volume":"128 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371241237589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to understand the collision characteristics of different soccer balls by determining energy dissipation (ED) during collisions. Soccer balls from five different brands were kicked towards a framed tempered glass. The kicks were performed with the balls inflated under three inner pressure conditions. The motion of each ball was recorded using two high-speed cameras at 6000 Hz. The contact surface area (CSA), ball indentation amount (IA), reaction forces (RF) and energetic coefficient of restitution (CoR) during contact were calculated via image processing methods. A new methodological approach was developed to determine the ED during the collision (EDDC). The accuracy of the estimated RF was validated using force plate data, and the CSA values validated the calculated IA. The EDDC were then reduced to a single value to compare with the CoR values obtained using the traditional formula. Differences between CoR and EDDC were statistically tested. One-way ANOVA tests were performed separately to compare the effect of the ball brand on the IA and EDDC for each inner pressure condition. The CoR and EDDC showed no significant difference, proving that the developed method is a valid measure of ED. At 1.0 bar inner pressure, IA and EDDC showed significant differences according to the brands. EDDC, depending on the ball quality, decreased at higher inner pressure values regardless of the brand. Consequently, the present study exhibited that ball quality becomes a critical factor in collision dynamics at high inner pressure values, considering that ball inner pressure may vary between 0.6 and 1.0 bar in official soccer matches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用能量耗散法比较足球的碰撞动力学
本研究旨在通过测定碰撞过程中的能量耗散(ED)来了解不同足球的碰撞特性。研究人员将五个不同品牌的足球踢向有边框的钢化玻璃。踢球时,足球在三种内压条件下充气。使用两台高速摄像机以 6000 Hz 的频率记录每个球的运动。通过图像处理方法计算了接触过程中的接触表面积(CSA)、球压痕量(IA)、反作用力(RF)和能量恢复系数(CoR)。还开发了一种新的方法来确定碰撞过程中的反作用力(EDDC)。使用测力板数据验证了估计 RF 的准确性,CSA 值验证了计算的 IA。然后,将 EDDC 还原为一个单一值,与使用传统公式获得的 CoR 值进行比较。对 CoR 和 EDDC 之间的差异进行了统计检验。分别进行了单因素方差分析测试,以比较球品牌对每种内压条件下 IA 和 EDDC 的影响。结果表明,CoR 和 EDDC 没有显著差异,证明所开发的方法是衡量 ED 的有效方法。在 1.0 巴内压条件下,不同品牌的 IA 和 EDDC 有显著差异。EDDC 取决于球的质量,无论品牌如何,内压值越高,EDDC 越小。因此,本研究表明,考虑到正式足球比赛中球的内压可能在 0.6 至 1.0 巴之间变化,在高内压值下,球的质量成为碰撞动力学的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology covers the development of novel sports apparel, footwear, and equipment; and the materials, instrumentation, and processes that make advances in sports possible.
期刊最新文献
Effects of training repetition on young footballers’ tactical and physical performances: free and conditioned large-sided games A single trunk-mounted wearable sensor to measure motor performance in triathletes during competition The effectiveness of chalk as a friction modifier for finger pad contact with rocks of varying roughness In-plane density gradation of shoe midsoles for optimal energy absorption performance Development of a video-based test for assessing decision-making proficiency in football referees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1