Factors affecting individuals’ cognitive engagement during group work in general chemistry: timing, group size, and question type

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Chemistry Education Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1039/D3RP00279A
Safaa Y. El-Mansy, Alexandra Stephens, Abigale Mortensen, Joan M. Francis, Shayna Feldman, Cecilia A. Sahnow, Jack Barbera and Alissa J. Hartig
{"title":"Factors affecting individuals’ cognitive engagement during group work in general chemistry: timing, group size, and question type","authors":"Safaa Y. El-Mansy, Alexandra Stephens, Abigale Mortensen, Joan M. Francis, Shayna Feldman, Cecilia A. Sahnow, Jack Barbera and Alissa J. Hartig","doi":"10.1039/D3RP00279A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Understanding how individual students cognitively engage while participating in small group activities in a General Chemistry class can provide insight into what factors may be influencing their level of engagement. The Interactive–Constructive–Active–Passive (ICAP) framework was used to identify individual students’ level of engagement on items in multiple activities during a General Chemistry course. The effects of timing, group size, and question type on engagement were investigated. Results indicate students’ engagement varied more in the first half of the term, and students demonstrated higher levels of engagement when working in smaller groups or subsets of larger groups when these groups contained students with similar levels of knowledge. Finally, the relation between question type (algorithmic <em>versus</em> explanation) and engagement depended on the activity topic. In an activity on Solutions and Dilutions, there was a significant relation where algorithmic items had higher occurrences of Interactive engagement. The implications of this work regarding teaching and research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 3","pages":" 799-814"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/rp/d3rp00279a","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how individual students cognitively engage while participating in small group activities in a General Chemistry class can provide insight into what factors may be influencing their level of engagement. The Interactive–Constructive–Active–Passive (ICAP) framework was used to identify individual students’ level of engagement on items in multiple activities during a General Chemistry course. The effects of timing, group size, and question type on engagement were investigated. Results indicate students’ engagement varied more in the first half of the term, and students demonstrated higher levels of engagement when working in smaller groups or subsets of larger groups when these groups contained students with similar levels of knowledge. Finally, the relation between question type (algorithmic versus explanation) and engagement depended on the activity topic. In an activity on Solutions and Dilutions, there was a significant relation where algorithmic items had higher occurrences of Interactive engagement. The implications of this work regarding teaching and research are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普通化学小组合作学习中影响个人认知参与的因素:时间、小组人数和问题类型
了解每个学生在普通化学课上参加小组活动时的认知参与情况,可以帮助我们深入了解哪些因素可能会影响他们的参与程度。本研究采用互动-建构-主动-被动(ICAP)框架来确定学生在普通化学课程的多个活动中的参与程度。研究了时间、小组规模和问题类型对参与度的影响。结果表明,在学期的前半部分,学生的参与度变化较大,当学生在较小的小组或较大小组的子集中学习时,如果这些小组中的学生知识水平相近,学生的参与度会更高。最后,问题类型(算法与解释)与参与度之间的关系取决于活动主题。在一个关于 "溶液和稀释 "的活动中,算法题的互动参与度较高,两者之间存在显著关系。本文讨论了这项工作对教学和研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
期刊最新文献
Guidance on the data availability statement requirement in CERP The use of mobile technology in abductive inquiry-based teaching and learning of chemical bonding Improving the teaching of entropy and the second law of thermodynamics: a systematic review with meta-analysis “I’m still here and I want them to know that”: experiences of chemists with concealable identities in undergraduate research A lack of impact of pedagogy (peer-led team learning compared with didactic instruction) on long-term student knowledge of chemical equilibrium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1