Mitigating the Impact of Inaccurate Feedback in Dynamic Learning-to-Rank: A Study of Overlooked Interesting Items

IF 7.2 4区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1145/3653983
Chenhao Zhang, Weitong Chen, Wei Emma Zhang, Miao Xu
{"title":"Mitigating the Impact of Inaccurate Feedback in Dynamic Learning-to-Rank: A Study of Overlooked Interesting Items","authors":"Chenhao Zhang, Weitong Chen, Wei Emma Zhang, Miao Xu","doi":"10.1145/3653983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dynamic Learning-to-Rank (DLTR) is a method of updating a ranking policy in real-time based on user feedback, which may not always be accurate. Although previous DLTR work has achieved fair and unbiased DLTR under inaccurate feedback, they face the trade-off between fairness and user utility and also have limitations in the setting of feeding items. Existing DLTR works improve ranking utility by eliminating bias from inaccurate feedback on observed items, but the impact of another pervasive form of inaccurate feedback, overlooked or ignored interesting items, remains unclear. For example, users may browse the rankings too quickly to catch interesting items or miss interesting items because the snippets are not optimized enough. This phenomenon raises two questions: i) <i>Will overlooked interesting items affect the ranking results?</i> ii) <i>Is it possible to improve utility without sacrificing fairness if these effects are eliminated?</i> These questions are particularly relevant for small and medium-sized retailers who are just starting out and may have limited data, leading to the use of inaccurate feedback to update their models. In this paper, we find that inaccurate feedback in the form of overlooked interesting items has a negative impact on DLTR performance in terms of utility. To address this, we treat the overlooked interesting items as noise and propose a novel DLTR method, the Co-teaching Rank (CoTeR), that has good utility and fairness performance when inaccurate feedback is present in the form of overlooked interesting items. Our solution incorporates a co-teaching-based component with a customized loss function and data sampling strategy, as well as a mean pooling strategy to further accommodate newly added products without historical data. Through experiments, we demonstrate that CoTeRx not only enhances utilities but also preserves ranking fairness, and can smoothly handle newly introduced items.</p>","PeriodicalId":48967,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3653983","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dynamic Learning-to-Rank (DLTR) is a method of updating a ranking policy in real-time based on user feedback, which may not always be accurate. Although previous DLTR work has achieved fair and unbiased DLTR under inaccurate feedback, they face the trade-off between fairness and user utility and also have limitations in the setting of feeding items. Existing DLTR works improve ranking utility by eliminating bias from inaccurate feedback on observed items, but the impact of another pervasive form of inaccurate feedback, overlooked or ignored interesting items, remains unclear. For example, users may browse the rankings too quickly to catch interesting items or miss interesting items because the snippets are not optimized enough. This phenomenon raises two questions: i) Will overlooked interesting items affect the ranking results? ii) Is it possible to improve utility without sacrificing fairness if these effects are eliminated? These questions are particularly relevant for small and medium-sized retailers who are just starting out and may have limited data, leading to the use of inaccurate feedback to update their models. In this paper, we find that inaccurate feedback in the form of overlooked interesting items has a negative impact on DLTR performance in terms of utility. To address this, we treat the overlooked interesting items as noise and propose a novel DLTR method, the Co-teaching Rank (CoTeR), that has good utility and fairness performance when inaccurate feedback is present in the form of overlooked interesting items. Our solution incorporates a co-teaching-based component with a customized loss function and data sampling strategy, as well as a mean pooling strategy to further accommodate newly added products without historical data. Through experiments, we demonstrate that CoTeRx not only enhances utilities but also preserves ranking fairness, and can smoothly handle newly introduced items.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减轻动态排名学习中不准确反馈的影响:被忽视的有趣项目研究
动态学习排名(DLTR)是一种根据用户反馈实时更新排名策略的方法,而用户反馈不一定总是准确的。虽然之前的 DLTR 工作在不准确反馈的情况下实现了公平无偏的 DLTR,但它们面临着公平性和用户效用之间的权衡,而且在喂养项目的设置上也有局限性。现有的 DLTR 工作通过消除对观察到的项目的不准确反馈所产生的偏差来提高排名效用,但另一种普遍存在的不准确反馈形式--被忽视或忽略的有趣项目--的影响仍不清楚。例如,用户可能会因为浏览排名过快而无法捕捉到有趣的条目,或者因为片段优化不够而错过了有趣的条目。这种现象提出了两个问题:i) 被忽略的有趣条目是否会影响排名结果?ii) 如果消除这些影响,是否有可能在不牺牲公平性的情况下提高效用?这些问题对于刚刚起步的中小型零售商尤为重要,因为他们的数据可能有限,导致使用不准确的反馈来更新模型。在本文中,我们发现以被忽视的有趣商品为形式的不准确反馈会对 DLTR 的效用表现产生负面影响。为了解决这个问题,我们将被忽略的有趣条目视为噪音,并提出了一种新颖的 DLTR 方法--协同教学排名(CoTeR),当以被忽略的有趣条目形式出现不准确反馈时,该方法具有良好的实用性和公平性。我们的解决方案包含一个基于协同教学的组件,该组件具有定制的损失函数和数据采样策略,以及一个均值池策略,以进一步适应没有历史数据的新添加产品。通过实验,我们证明了 CoTeRx 不仅能提高效用,还能保持排名的公平性,并能顺利处理新引入的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology is a scholarly journal that publishes the highest quality papers on intelligent systems, applicable algorithms and technology with a multi-disciplinary perspective. An intelligent system is one that uses artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to offer important services (e.g., as a component of a larger system) to allow integrated systems to perceive, reason, learn, and act intelligently in the real world. ACM TIST is published quarterly (six issues a year). Each issue has 8-11 regular papers, with around 20 published journal pages or 10,000 words per paper. Additional references, proofs, graphs or detailed experiment results can be submitted as a separate appendix, while excessively lengthy papers will be rejected automatically. Authors can include online-only appendices for additional content of their published papers and are encouraged to share their code and/or data with other readers.
期刊最新文献
A Survey of Trustworthy Federated Learning: Issues, Solutions, and Challenges DeepSneak: User GPS Trajectory Reconstruction from Federated Route Recommendation Models WC-SBERT: Zero-Shot Topic Classification Using SBERT and Light Self-Training on Wikipedia Categories Self-supervised Text Style Transfer using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks Federated Learning Survey: A Multi-Level Taxonomy of Aggregation Techniques, Experimental Insights, and Future Frontiers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1