Quadriceps femoris muscle ultrasound in sarcoidosis: an observational case-control study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-29 DOI:10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08232-7
Rana Terlemez, Buket Caliskaner Ozturk, Sevgi S Kurtoglu, Deniz Palamar, Ersan Atahan, Kenan Akgun
{"title":"Quadriceps femoris muscle ultrasound in sarcoidosis: an observational case-control study.","authors":"Rana Terlemez, Buket Caliskaner Ozturk, Sevgi S Kurtoglu, Deniz Palamar, Ersan Atahan, Kenan Akgun","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08232-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although loss of muscle mass may be associated with general weakness, intolerance to physical activity and fatigue, it is underestimated and poorly understood in patients with sarcoidosis.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the quadriceps femoris muscle (QFM) thickness measured by ultrasonography (US) between the female patients with sarcoidosis and controls, secondly to assess the correlation between the muscle strength, fatigue and QFM thickness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational, case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department of a University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Thirty-one women with sarcoidosis and 27 healthy volunteers were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants were evaluated for the following outcomes: 1) handgrip strength; 2) QFM thickness measured using US; and 3) sonographic thigh adjustment ratio (STAR). The sarcoidosis group was also evaluated with the 30-second chair stand test (30s-CST) and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The QFM thickness and STAR values of the patients with sarcoidosis were significantly lower than those of the controls (P=0.0001). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the handgrip strengths of the groups (P=0.581). There was no statistically significant correlation between the STAR values and handgrip strength in the sarcoidosis group; however, there was a significant positive correlation between the STAR values and 30s-CST (r=0.467, P=0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Loss of muscle mass is one of the musculoskeletal conditions in patients with sarcoidosis that may be associated with nonspecific symptoms, such as general debility, intolerance to physical activity, and fatigue. In the present study, no difference was observed in hand grip strength between the groups, while we found that QFM thickness was affected in patients with sarcoidosis when compared to the controls. The ultrasonographic QFM evaluation seems to be an innovative tool which may be used at all stages of sarcoidosis patient follow-up.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>The grip strength is a commonly used test to detect muscle weakness, but onset of a decrease in muscle mass in the lower extremities may occur earlier. Considering the increased burden of musculoskeletal problems in this population, performing 30s-CST and sonographic QFM thickness is practical methods to identify risky patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12044,"journal":{"name":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11255879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08232-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although loss of muscle mass may be associated with general weakness, intolerance to physical activity and fatigue, it is underestimated and poorly understood in patients with sarcoidosis.

Aim: To compare the quadriceps femoris muscle (QFM) thickness measured by ultrasonography (US) between the female patients with sarcoidosis and controls, secondly to assess the correlation between the muscle strength, fatigue and QFM thickness.

Design: Observational, case-control study.

Setting: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department of a University Hospital.

Population: Thirty-one women with sarcoidosis and 27 healthy volunteers were included in the study.

Methods: The participants were evaluated for the following outcomes: 1) handgrip strength; 2) QFM thickness measured using US; and 3) sonographic thigh adjustment ratio (STAR). The sarcoidosis group was also evaluated with the 30-second chair stand test (30s-CST) and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS).

Results: The QFM thickness and STAR values of the patients with sarcoidosis were significantly lower than those of the controls (P=0.0001). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the handgrip strengths of the groups (P=0.581). There was no statistically significant correlation between the STAR values and handgrip strength in the sarcoidosis group; however, there was a significant positive correlation between the STAR values and 30s-CST (r=0.467, P=0.008).

Conclusions: Loss of muscle mass is one of the musculoskeletal conditions in patients with sarcoidosis that may be associated with nonspecific symptoms, such as general debility, intolerance to physical activity, and fatigue. In the present study, no difference was observed in hand grip strength between the groups, while we found that QFM thickness was affected in patients with sarcoidosis when compared to the controls. The ultrasonographic QFM evaluation seems to be an innovative tool which may be used at all stages of sarcoidosis patient follow-up.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: The grip strength is a commonly used test to detect muscle weakness, but onset of a decrease in muscle mass in the lower extremities may occur earlier. Considering the increased burden of musculoskeletal problems in this population, performing 30s-CST and sonographic QFM thickness is practical methods to identify risky patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肉样瘤病中的股四头肌超声:一项观察性病例对照研究。
背景:目的:比较肉样瘤病女性患者和对照组之间通过超声波检查(US)测量的股四头肌(QFM)厚度,其次评估肌力、疲劳和QFM厚度之间的相关性:观察性病例对照研究:研究对象: 31名患有肉样瘤的女性:研究对象:31 名女性肉样瘤患者和 27 名健康志愿者:方法:对参与者进行以下评估:1)手握力;2)用超声波测量的 QFM 厚度;3)超声波大腿调整率 (STAR)。肉样瘤组还接受了 30 秒椅子站立测试(30s-CST)和疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)的评估:结果:肉样瘤病患者的 QFM 厚度和 STAR 值明显低于对照组(P=0.0001)。然而,两组患者的手握力差异无统计学意义(P=0.581)。肉样瘤病组的 STAR 值与手握力之间没有统计学意义上的显著相关性;但 STAR 值与 30s-CST 之间存在显著的正相关性(r=0.467,P=0.008):肌肉质量下降是肉样瘤病患者肌肉骨骼状况之一,可能与全身衰弱、不耐体力活动和疲劳等非特异性症状有关。在本研究中,各组间的手部握力未见差异,但我们发现,与对照组相比,肉样瘤病患者的 QFM 厚度受到了影响。超声 QFM 评估似乎是一种创新工具,可用于肉样瘤病患者随访的各个阶段:临床康复的影响:握力是检测肌无力的常用测试,但下肢肌肉质量下降可能会更早出现。考虑到这一人群肌肉骨骼问题的负担加重,进行 30s-CST 和超声 QFM 厚度检查是识别高危患者的实用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine publishes papers of clinical interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
期刊最新文献
Analysis and relationship between the volume of upper limb lymphoedema and pressure pain threshold, neural range of motion, pain intensity, kinesiophobia, pain hypervigilance and catastrophizing in breast cancer survivors. Long-term life expectancy in severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Randomized controlled trials as a source of evidence in rehabilitation: a critical analysis. Efficacy and tolerability of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with plantar fasciopathy: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. Is the Silfverskiöld Test a valid tool for evaluating calf muscles spastic overactivity in patients with stroke? A retrospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1