Comparison of CT dental reconstruction techniques for use in identification of the deceased

IF 0.8 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Forensic Imaging Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1016/j.fri.2024.200582
Catherine Vincent , Lyndall Smythe
{"title":"Comparison of CT dental reconstruction techniques for use in identification of the deceased","authors":"Catherine Vincent ,&nbsp;Lyndall Smythe","doi":"10.1016/j.fri.2024.200582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Post-mortem CT data files can be used to create curved multi-planar dental reconstructions for use in the identification of the deceased.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>21 decedents were scanned using a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash CT scanner on admission to VIFM. This data was reconstructed into four differing dental CMPRS on both the CT Console workstation and the Syngo.Via workstation. Cases selected met the following criteria: requiring scientific identification and adult dentition present. The four reconstruction techniques on two post processing platforms were then compared and graded by a forensic odontologist.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For both maxilla and mandible data sets the CT Console 2.5/2.5 faired poorer than all the other reconstructions included in this study. Statistically speaking all the other reconstruction techniques were of equivalent value. The reconstruction that was graded as best for AM: PM comparison most frequently was 20 mm/5 mm for both jaws.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The SyngoVia® software's capacity to correct for head rotation and tilt can virtually align the image to a more symmetrical position. Used in combination with the thicker reconstruction slices of 20 mm combined with finer slice interval of 5 mm offers the image appearance similar to that of a true AM OPG projection and can enhance the features useful for dental identification comparison techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The 20 mm slice thickness/5 mm slice interval reconstruction method (processed on the SyngoVia® platform) provides the most useful image for AM to PM dental comparisons.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":40763,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Imaging","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 200582"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266622562400006X/pdfft?md5=8b8b5d44f2cde152f151e67c5f5d1a93&pid=1-s2.0-S266622562400006X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266622562400006X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Post-mortem CT data files can be used to create curved multi-planar dental reconstructions for use in the identification of the deceased.

Materials and methods

21 decedents were scanned using a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash CT scanner on admission to VIFM. This data was reconstructed into four differing dental CMPRS on both the CT Console workstation and the Syngo.Via workstation. Cases selected met the following criteria: requiring scientific identification and adult dentition present. The four reconstruction techniques on two post processing platforms were then compared and graded by a forensic odontologist.

Results

For both maxilla and mandible data sets the CT Console 2.5/2.5 faired poorer than all the other reconstructions included in this study. Statistically speaking all the other reconstruction techniques were of equivalent value. The reconstruction that was graded as best for AM: PM comparison most frequently was 20 mm/5 mm for both jaws.

Discussion

The SyngoVia® software's capacity to correct for head rotation and tilt can virtually align the image to a more symmetrical position. Used in combination with the thicker reconstruction slices of 20 mm combined with finer slice interval of 5 mm offers the image appearance similar to that of a true AM OPG projection and can enhance the features useful for dental identification comparison techniques.

Conclusion

The 20 mm slice thickness/5 mm slice interval reconstruction method (processed on the SyngoVia® platform) provides the most useful image for AM to PM dental comparisons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于鉴定死者身份的 CT 牙齿重建技术比较
材料和方法 21 名死者在入住 VIFM 时使用西门子 Somatom Definition Flash CT 扫描仪进行了扫描。这些数据在 CT Console 工作站和 Syngo.Via 工作站上重建成四种不同的牙科 CMPRS。所选病例符合以下标准:需要科学鉴定且存在成人牙齿。结果对于上颌骨和下颌骨数据集,CT Console 2.5/2.5 的表现比本研究中的所有其他重建技术都要差。从统计学角度看,所有其他重建技术的价值相当。在上午和下午的对比中,被评为最佳的重建技术是 20 毫米/5 毫米:讨论SyngoVia®软件的头部旋转和倾斜校正功能可将图像校正到更对称的位置。结合使用更厚的 20 毫米重建切片和更细的 5 毫米切片间隔,可提供类似于真正 AM OPG 投影的图像外观,并可增强牙科识别比较技术的有用特征。结论 20 毫米切片厚度/5 毫米切片间隔重建方法(在 SyngoVia® 平台上处理)可提供最有用的 AM 与 PM 牙科比较图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Imaging
Forensic Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
27.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Closed iris, long exposure photography improves three-dimensional photogrammetric bone reconstructions Cranial surgical approaches in the 21st Century Identified Skeletal Collection Unveiling the diagnostic accuracy of PMCT: Detection of pneumonia considering postmortem changes and time intervals Exploring lightweight convolution neural networks for segmenting striation marks from firearm bullet images Age estimation based on sternebral fusion in a sample of Egyptian population using three-dimensional computed tomography scanning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1