Psychometric Evaluation of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) in Algeria: A Comprehensive Approach Utilizing Network Analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and the Polytomous Rasch Model.

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Assessment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1177/10731911241239772
Ahmed Kerriche
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) in Algeria: A Comprehensive Approach Utilizing Network Analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and the Polytomous Rasch Model.","authors":"Ahmed Kerriche","doi":"10.1177/10731911241239772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) by employing network analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and the Polytomous Rasch Model. A cross-sectional data set was collected comprising 1,530 participants, with 959 being women and 571 being men. The Bootstrap Exploratory Graph Analysis unveiled the presence of two dimensions, with Items 17, 15, 5, 14, 6, and 9 exhibiting the highest strength centrality index. Notably, the Network Comparison Test indicated no differences in Network Invariance and global strength between the networks of women and men. Furthermore, the confirmatory factor analysis results demonstrated that the two extracted dimensions displayed an acceptable goodness of fit. In addition, the reliability coefficient values were acceptable, exceeding the threshold of 0.70. The Rasch analysis results suggested an overall fit, but some items exhibited overlap, suggesting their potential removal. Furthermore, it was recommended to develop new items to address gaps between existing items, particularly for measuring the lower levels of Social Anxiety Disorder. In conclusion, these findings provide robust evidence supporting the reliability and validity of the SPIN as a tool for measuring Social Anxiety Disorder in Algeria.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"147-161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241239772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) by employing network analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and the Polytomous Rasch Model. A cross-sectional data set was collected comprising 1,530 participants, with 959 being women and 571 being men. The Bootstrap Exploratory Graph Analysis unveiled the presence of two dimensions, with Items 17, 15, 5, 14, 6, and 9 exhibiting the highest strength centrality index. Notably, the Network Comparison Test indicated no differences in Network Invariance and global strength between the networks of women and men. Furthermore, the confirmatory factor analysis results demonstrated that the two extracted dimensions displayed an acceptable goodness of fit. In addition, the reliability coefficient values were acceptable, exceeding the threshold of 0.70. The Rasch analysis results suggested an overall fit, but some items exhibited overlap, suggesting their potential removal. Furthermore, it was recommended to develop new items to address gaps between existing items, particularly for measuring the lower levels of Social Anxiety Disorder. In conclusion, these findings provide robust evidence supporting the reliability and validity of the SPIN as a tool for measuring Social Anxiety Disorder in Algeria.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔及利亚社交恐惧症量表(SPIN)的心理计量学评估:利用网络分析、确证因子分析和多态拉施模型的综合方法。
本研究旨在通过采用网络分析、确认性因素分析和多项式 Rasch 模型来评估社交恐惧症量表(SPIN)的心理测量学特征。研究收集了 1530 名参与者的横截面数据,其中女性 959 人,男性 571 人。Bootstrap 探索性图表分析揭示了两个维度的存在,其中项目 17、15、5、14、6 和 9 的强度中心性指数最高。值得注意的是,网络比较测试表明,男女网络在网络不变性和整体强度方面没有差异。此外,确认性因子分析结果表明,提取的两个维度显示出了可接受的拟合度。此外,信度系数值也可以接受,超过了 0.70 的临界值。Rasch 分析结果表明总体上是拟合的,但有些项目出现了重叠,这表明有可能将其删除。此外,还建议开发新的项目来弥补现有项目之间的差距,尤其是在测量较低水平的社交焦虑症时。总之,这些研究结果提供了有力的证据,支持 SPIN 作为阿尔及利亚社交焦虑症测量工具的可靠性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
The Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory: Psychometric Properties and Symptom Comparisons in Women With and Without Brain Injuries Due to Intimate Partner Violence. Measuring Process Factors of Fluid Reasoning Using Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. A Network Analysis of Digital Clock Drawing for Command and Copy Conditions. Assessing Between- and Within-Person Reliabilities of Items and Scale for Daily Procrastination: A Multilevel and Dynamic Approach. Development and Initial Validation of a Momentary Cannabis Craving Scale Within a Homogeneous Sample of U.S. Emerging Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1