首页 > 最新文献

Assessment最新文献

英文 中文
Measures of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Use in Clinical and Research Settings. 儿童和青少年自杀想法和行为的测量方法:系统回顾及临床和研究环境中的使用建议》(A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Use in Clinical and Research Settings)。
IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-14 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241249438

Empirically supported measures of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) are needed to serve as reference outcomes for suicide risk screening tools and to monitor severity and treatment progress in children and adolescents with STBs. The present paper systematically reviewed existing measures of STBs in youth and studies evaluating their psychometric properties and clinical utility. Measures were then evaluated on reliability, validity, and clinical utility. Sixteen articles (20 independent samples) were found with psychometric data with youth samples for eight measures. Interview-based measures were found to have the strongest psychometric support and clinical utility. Significant limitations exist for all self-report measures due to inherent characteristics of these measures that cannot be remedied through additional psychometric study. There is an urgent need for the development and validation of new self-report measures of STBs, particularly for preadolescent children, sexual and gender minority youth, and racial/ethnic minority youth.

我们需要得到经验支持的自杀想法和行为(STBs)测量方法,以作为自杀风险筛查工具的参考结果,并监测患有 STBs 的儿童和青少年的严重程度和治疗进展。本文系统回顾了现有的青少年 STB 测量方法,以及对其心理测量特性和临床实用性进行评估的研究。然后对测量方法的可靠性、有效性和临床实用性进行了评估。结果发现有 16 篇文章(20 个独立样本)提供了 8 种测量方法的青少年样本心理测量数据。结果发现,基于访谈的测量方法具有最强的心理测量支持和临床实用性。由于这些测量方法的固有特征,所有自我报告测量方法都存在很大的局限性,而这些局限性是无法通过额外的心理测量研究来弥补的。我们迫切需要开发和验证新的 STB 自我报告测量方法,尤其是针对青春期前儿童、性和性别少数群体青少年以及少数种族/族裔青少年的测量方法。
{"title":"Measures of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Use in Clinical and Research Settings.","authors":"Richard T Liu, Alexandra H Bettis, Hannah R Lawrence, Rachel F L Walsh, Ana E Sheehan, Olivia H Pollak, Auburn R Stephenson, Marin M Kautz, Rachel M Marlowe","doi":"10.1177/10731911241249438","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241249438","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Empirically supported measures of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) are needed to serve as reference outcomes for suicide risk screening tools and to monitor severity and treatment progress in children and adolescents with STBs. The present paper systematically reviewed existing measures of STBs in youth and studies evaluating their psychometric properties and clinical utility. Measures were then evaluated on reliability, validity, and clinical utility. Sixteen articles (20 independent samples) were found with psychometric data with youth samples for eight measures. Interview-based measures were found to have the strongest psychometric support and clinical utility. Significant limitations exist for all self-report measures due to inherent characteristics of these measures that cannot be remedied through additional psychometric study. There is an urgent need for the development and validation of new self-report measures of STBs, particularly for preadolescent children, sexual and gender minority youth, and racial/ethnic minority youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"303-320"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140920968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Competing Models of Personality Disorder: Relations With Psychosocial Functioning. 人格障碍的竞争模式:与社会心理功能的关系》。
IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241253409

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013), includes 10 categorical personality disorders (PD) in Section II (Section II PD) and a dimensional alternative model of PD (AMPD) in Section III. We compared the two models in explaining concurrent psychosocial functioning levels in psychiatric outpatients and community residents screened as at risk for PD pathology (N = 600). The AMPD's fully dimensional form showed stronger associations with psychosocial difficulties and explained more of their variance compared with the categorical Section II PD. AMPD Criterion A (personality functioning impairment) and Criterion B (pathological traits) incrementally predicted psychosocial functioning about equally with some unique predictions. Finally, AMPD's six categorical PD diagnoses did not show stronger associations with psychosocial functioning than the corresponding Section II PD diagnoses. Findings directly comparing the two models remain important and timely for informing future conceptualizations of PD in the diagnostic system.

精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5;美国精神病学协会,2013 年)第二部分包括 10 种分类人格障碍(PD)(第二部分 PD),第三部分包括人格障碍的维度替代模型(AMPD)。我们比较了这两个模型在解释精神科门诊患者和被筛查出有人格障碍病理风险的社区居民(600 人)的并发社会心理功能水平方面的作用。与分类的第二部分 PD 相比,AMPD 的全维度形式显示出与社会心理障碍更强的关联性,并能解释更多的变异。AMPD 标准 A(人格功能障碍)和标准 B(病理特质)对社会心理功能的预测作用大致相同,但有一些独特的预测作用。最后,AMPD 的六个分类人格功能障碍诊断与社会心理功能的关联性并不比相应的第二部分人格功能障碍诊断更强。直接比较这两种模型的研究结果对于未来诊断系统中的帕金森病概念化仍然非常重要和及时。
{"title":"Competing Models of Personality Disorder: Relations With Psychosocial Functioning.","authors":"Eunyoe Ro, Hallie Nuzum, Lee Anna Clark","doi":"10.1177/10731911241253409","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241253409","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition</i> (<i>DSM-5</i>; American Psychiatric Association, 2013), includes 10 categorical personality disorders (PD) in Section II (Section II PD) and a dimensional alternative model of PD (AMPD) in Section III. We compared the two models in explaining concurrent psychosocial functioning levels in psychiatric outpatients and community residents screened as at risk for PD pathology (<i>N</i> = 600). The AMPD's fully dimensional form showed stronger associations with psychosocial difficulties and explained more of their variance compared with the categorical Section II PD. AMPD Criterion A (personality functioning impairment) and Criterion B (pathological traits) incrementally predicted psychosocial functioning about equally with some unique predictions. Finally, AMPD's six categorical PD diagnoses did not show stronger associations with psychosocial functioning than the corresponding Section II PD diagnoses. Findings directly comparing the two models remain important and timely for informing future conceptualizations of PD in the diagnostic system.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"321-334"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141154869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing Implicit Theories in Sexual Offending Using Indirect Measures: Feasibility, Reliability, and Incremental Validity. 使用间接测量方法评估性犯罪中的内隐理论:可行性、可靠性和增量有效性。
IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241245009

This study assessed psychometric qualities of indirect measures assessing Implicit Theories (ITs) of sexual offending: Implicit Association Task (IAT), Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP), and Relational Responding Task (RRT). For comparison reasons, aggressive behavior was also assessed. In a male sample from the general population (N = 109), we assessed each measure's (a) feasibility (mean latency, error rate, passing criteria), (b) internal consistency, (c) convergent and discriminant validity, and (d) incremental and predictive validity. Results indicated that no indirect measure met all criteria. Although the IAT was reasonably feasible and reliable in measuring aggression, ITs could not be reliably assessed. The RRT was feasible and somewhat reliable in assessing ITs, whereas the IRAP showed limited feasibility, high task complexity, low reliability, and the presence of a method factor. No measure had incremental predictive validity over the use of self-report measures, although we note that the power to detect such associations was limited. As none of the indirect measures performed satisfactorily on the measured criteria, the use of these measures in clinical practice seems currently unwarranted to assess ITs.

本研究评估了评估性犯罪内隐理论(ITs)的间接测量方法的心理测量质量:内隐联想任务(IAT)、内隐关系评估程序(IRAP)和关系反应任务(RRT)。为了便于比较,还对攻击行为进行了评估。在一个来自普通人群的男性样本(N = 109)中,我们评估了每项测量的(a)可行性(平均潜伏期、错误率、通过标准)、(b)内部一致性、(c)收敛性和鉴别性有效性,以及(d)增量性和预测性有效性。结果表明,没有一种间接测量方法符合所有标准。虽然 IAT 在测量攻击性方面相当可行和可靠,但 ITs 无法得到可靠的评估。RRT 在评估 ITs 方面具有可行性和一定的可靠性,而 IRAP 则显示出有限的可行性、较高的任务复杂性、较低的可靠性以及方法因素的存在。与使用自我报告的方法相比,没有一种方法具有更高的预测有效性,尽管我们注意到检测这种关联的能力有限。由于没有一种间接测量方法在测量标准上的表现令人满意,因此目前似乎没有必要在临床实践中使用这些方法来评估信息技术。
{"title":"Assessing Implicit Theories in Sexual Offending Using Indirect Measures: Feasibility, Reliability, and Incremental Validity.","authors":"Mirthe G C Noteborn, Jelle J Sijtsema, Jaap J A Denissen, Stefan Bogaerts","doi":"10.1177/10731911241245009","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241245009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed psychometric qualities of indirect measures assessing Implicit Theories (ITs) of sexual offending: Implicit Association Task (IAT), Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP), and Relational Responding Task (RRT). For comparison reasons, aggressive behavior was also assessed. In a male sample from the general population (<i>N</i> = 109), we assessed each measure's (a) feasibility (mean latency, error rate, passing criteria), (b) internal consistency, (c) convergent and discriminant validity, and (d) incremental and predictive validity. Results indicated that no indirect measure met all criteria. Although the IAT was reasonably feasible and reliable in measuring aggression, ITs could not be reliably assessed. The RRT was feasible and somewhat reliable in assessing ITs, whereas the IRAP showed limited feasibility, high task complexity, low reliability, and the presence of a method factor. No measure had incremental predictive validity over the use of self-report measures, although we note that the power to detect such associations was limited. As none of the indirect measures performed satisfactorily on the measured criteria, the use of these measures in clinical practice seems currently unwarranted to assess ITs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"447-469"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915770/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140875717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and Initial Validation of the State Four Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire.
IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-03-31 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251330092
Stephen Raynes, Karen Dobkins

The current research aimed to provide initial psychometric validation of a new multifaceted mindfulness questionnaire (referred to as the State Four Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, or the "state-4FMQ" for short) adapted from the commonly used Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (referred to as the "trait-FFMQ"). The research was divided into two pre-registered studies. In both, undergraduates partook in a 20-minute mindfulness meditation (via audio recording), and then answered questions, including the state-4FMQ, pertaining to their experience during the meditation. In Study 2, participants additionally partook in a 20-minute control condition. The state-4FMQ was developed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA; Study 1) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; Study 2). In Study 2, a short-form of the state-4FMQ was established, and several additional forms of measurement validity were tested. EFA and CFA results supported a four-factor structure, which was identical to the trait-FFMQ with the exclusion of Nonreactivity. This newly created state-4FMQ, and its short-form, showed good internal consistency as well as convergent, predictive, and construct validity. In addition, it was found that some facets, more than others, predicted momentary well-being. The validity of the state-4FMQ shows that it can be used to measure multiple facets of state mindfulness across a variety of situations.

目前的研究旨在对从常用的五面正念问卷(简称 "特质-正念问卷")改编而来的新的多面正念问卷(简称 "状态-四面正念问卷")进行初步心理测量验证。研究分为两项预先登记的研究。在这两项研究中,大学生都参加了20分钟的正念冥想(通过录音),然后回答了与他们在冥想过程中的体验有关的问题,包括状态-4FMQ。在研究 2 中,参与者还参加了 20 分钟的对照组。通过探索性因子分析(EFA,研究 1)和确认性因子分析(CFA,研究 2)开发了状态-4FMQ。在研究 2 中,建立了状态-4FMQ 的简表,并对其他几种测量有效性形式进行了测试。EFA和CFA结果支持四因素结构,该结构与特质-FFMQ相同,但排除了非反应性。这个新创建的状态-4FFMQ 及其简表显示出良好的内部一致性以及收敛性、预测性和建构效度。此外,研究还发现某些方面比其他方面更能预测瞬间幸福感。状态-4FMQ的有效性表明,它可以在各种情况下用于测量状态正念的多个方面。
{"title":"Development and Initial Validation of the State Four Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire.","authors":"Stephen Raynes, Karen Dobkins","doi":"10.1177/10731911251330092","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911251330092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current research aimed to provide initial psychometric validation of a new multifaceted mindfulness questionnaire (referred to as the State Four Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, or the \"state-4FMQ\" for short) adapted from the commonly used Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (referred to as the \"trait-FFMQ\"). The research was divided into two pre-registered studies. In both, undergraduates partook in a 20-minute mindfulness meditation (via audio recording), and then answered questions, including the state-4FMQ, pertaining to their experience during the meditation. In Study 2, participants additionally partook in a 20-minute control condition. The state-4FMQ was developed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA; Study 1) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; Study 2). In Study 2, a short-form of the state-4FMQ was established, and several additional forms of measurement validity were tested. EFA and CFA results supported a four-factor structure, which was identical to the trait-FFMQ with the exclusion of Nonreactivity. This newly created state-4FMQ, and its short-form, showed good internal consistency as well as convergent, predictive, and construct validity. In addition, it was found that some facets, more than others, predicted momentary well-being. The validity of the state-4FMQ shows that it can be used to measure multiple facets of state mindfulness across a variety of situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251330092"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143750900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Short Screener of the Cyber Aggression in Relationships Scale: Construct Validity and Reliability Cross-Cultural Samples.
IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-03-31 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251320597
Ohad Gilbar, Laura Watkins, Ruby Charak

The Cyber Aggression in Relationships Scale (CARS) is a widely used and validated measure of adult cyber intimate partner violence (C-IPV). The current study aimed to create a short screener of CARS (CARS-SS) through testing cross-cultural samples. To do so, we examined the rate of chosen items of the original scale on five pre-existing study samples: we then procured and tested the construct validity and reliability of the CARS-SS among two study samples (United States and Israel). Results of an item factor analysis confirmed one factor for both perpetration and victimization and analyses suggested good internal reliability. Overall, the CARS-SS was associated with a measure of in-person intimate partner violence. Findings suggest the CARS-SS may be a helpful measure of C-IPV among clinical and community samples of young adults.

关系中的网络侵犯量表(CARS)是一种广泛使用并经过验证的成人网络亲密伴侣暴力(C-IPV)测量方法。本研究旨在通过对跨文化样本进行测试,创建一个简短的 CARS 筛选器(CARS-SS)。为此,我们在五个已有的研究样本中检查了原始量表所选项目的比率:然后,我们在两个研究样本(美国和以色列)中获得并测试了 CARS-SS 的结构效度和信度。项目因素分析的结果证实,施暴和受害都有一个因素,分析表明其内部信度良好。总体而言,CARS-SS 与亲密伴侣间暴力行为的测量结果相关。研究结果表明,CARS-SS 可能是临床和社区年轻成年人亲密伴侣暴力的有效测量工具。
{"title":"Short Screener of the Cyber Aggression in Relationships Scale: Construct Validity and Reliability Cross-Cultural Samples.","authors":"Ohad Gilbar, Laura Watkins, Ruby Charak","doi":"10.1177/10731911251320597","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251320597","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Cyber Aggression in Relationships Scale (CARS) is a widely used and validated measure of adult cyber intimate partner violence (C-IPV). The current study aimed to create a short screener of CARS (CARS-SS) through testing cross-cultural samples. To do so, we examined the rate of chosen items of the original scale on five pre-existing study samples: we then procured and tested the construct validity and reliability of the CARS-SS among two study samples (United States and Israel). Results of an item factor analysis confirmed one factor for both perpetration and victimization and analyses suggested good internal reliability. Overall, the CARS-SS was associated with a measure of in-person intimate partner violence. Findings suggest the CARS-SS may be a helpful measure of C-IPV among clinical and community samples of young adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251320597"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143750901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Utility of the Five Factor Model of Personality as an Organizing Framework for Autism-Related Traits.
IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-03-31 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251326395
Edric S Widjaja, Emily K Spackman, Timothy F Bainbridge, Steven G Ludeke, Mirko Uljarevic, Kristelle Hudry, Luke D Smillie

Growing research suggests that clinical psychological traits are contiguous with normal personality and can be located within the same psychometric frameworks. In this article, we examined whether autism-related traits (ARTs) can plausibly be located within the Five Factor Model (FFM) of personality. Across two studies (Ns = 408 and 423), participants completed measures of ARTs, broad FFM domains, and narrower FFM facets. We used empirically derived criteria to evaluate whether ARTs overlapped (i.e., shared variance) with the FFM domains to a degree that was comparable to FFM facets. Results suggested that most socially oriented ARTs could be represented as facets of the extraversion domain, whereas behaviorally oriented ARTs were more peripheral to the FFM. Cognitively oriented ARTs were less consistently linked with the FFM. These findings highlight the value of the FFM as an organizing framework for ARTs, marking an important step toward synthesis across the personality and autism literatures.

越来越多的研究表明,临床心理特征与正常人格是相辅相成的,并且可以被定位在相同的心理测量框架内。在本文中,我们研究了自闭症相关特质(ARTs)是否可以合理地归入人格五因素模型(FFM)。在两项研究中(Ns = 408 和 423),参与者完成了 ARTs、广义 FFM 领域和狭义 FFM 面的测量。我们使用经验得出的标准来评估 ART 是否与 FFM 领域重叠(即共享方差),其程度是否与 FFM 方面相当。结果表明,大多数社交导向的 ART 都可以表示为外向性领域的切面,而行为导向的 ART 与 FFM 的切面更为边缘。认知导向的 ART 与 FFM 的联系则不那么一致。这些发现凸显了FFM作为ART组织框架的价值,标志着我们在人格和自闭症研究领域迈出了重要的一步。
{"title":"The Utility of the Five Factor Model of Personality as an Organizing Framework for Autism-Related Traits.","authors":"Edric S Widjaja, Emily K Spackman, Timothy F Bainbridge, Steven G Ludeke, Mirko Uljarevic, Kristelle Hudry, Luke D Smillie","doi":"10.1177/10731911251326395","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251326395","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Growing research suggests that clinical psychological traits are contiguous with normal personality and can be located within the same psychometric frameworks. In this article, we examined whether autism-related traits (ARTs) can plausibly be located within the Five Factor Model (FFM) of personality. Across two studies (<i>N</i>s = 408 and 423), participants completed measures of ARTs, broad FFM <i>domains</i>, and narrower FFM <i>facets</i>. We used empirically derived criteria to evaluate whether ARTs overlapped (i.e., shared variance) with the FFM domains to a degree that was comparable to FFM facets. Results suggested that most socially oriented ARTs could be represented as facets of the extraversion domain, whereas behaviorally oriented ARTs were more peripheral to the FFM. Cognitively oriented ARTs were less consistently linked with the FFM. These findings highlight the value of the FFM as an organizing framework for ARTs, marking an important step toward synthesis across the personality and autism literatures.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251326395"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143750060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Normative Values and Psychometric Properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in Substance Use Disorder Treatment Population.
IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-03-29 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251327255
Martin Hochheimer, Justin C Strickland, Jennifer D Ellis, Jill A Rabinowitz, J Gregory Hobelmann, Andrew S Huhn

This study evaluated the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) as a tool for measuring worry and anxiety levels among individuals entering treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs). The sample included 75,047 individuals admitted to SUD treatment centers, with assessments conducted weekly. Individuals entering SUD treatment exhibited higher baseline levels of worry; however, worry levels declined over the course of treatment. The PSWQ demonstrated good internal consistency, high test-retest reliability, and good discriminant validity when correlated with measures of depression and stress. The factor structure analysis confirmed that the PSWQ measures the same underlying construct of worry in the SUD treatment population, with a single-factor model showing satisfactory fit. This extends the reach of the PSWQ to the SUD treatment population by reaffirming its reliability, validity, and factor structure, with the expectation of higher levels of worry compared to a non-SUD population at the beginning of treatment, which decline over time.

{"title":"Normative Values and Psychometric Properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in Substance Use Disorder Treatment Population.","authors":"Martin Hochheimer, Justin C Strickland, Jennifer D Ellis, Jill A Rabinowitz, J Gregory Hobelmann, Andrew S Huhn","doi":"10.1177/10731911251327255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251327255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) as a tool for measuring worry and anxiety levels among individuals entering treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs). The sample included 75,047 individuals admitted to SUD treatment centers, with assessments conducted weekly. Individuals entering SUD treatment exhibited higher baseline levels of worry; however, worry levels declined over the course of treatment. The PSWQ demonstrated good internal consistency, high test-retest reliability, and good discriminant validity when correlated with measures of depression and stress. The factor structure analysis confirmed that the PSWQ measures the same underlying construct of worry in the SUD treatment population, with a single-factor model showing satisfactory fit. This extends the reach of the PSWQ to the SUD treatment population by reaffirming its reliability, validity, and factor structure, with the expectation of higher levels of worry compared to a non-SUD population at the beginning of treatment, which decline over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251327255"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143742080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Initial Development and Preliminary Validation of the Physical Drinking Contexts Scale. 身体饮酒情境量表的初步开发和初步验证。
IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-03-29 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251321930
Jack T Waddell, Scott E King, William R Corbin

Literature on the location and contextual features of drinking events (i.e., physical context) remains scant and underdeveloped. This study developed and provided preliminary validation of a measure typical physical drinking contexts. Participants (N = 1,642) self-reported their typical physical drinking context (via items generated), their drinking behavior, demographics, and typical social drinking context. Three samples (total N = 1,642) assessed factor structure, measurement invariance, and validity testing. Factor analyses suggested a four-factor structure, indicative of high arousal private (e.g., at a large house party), high arousal public (e.g., at a concert), low arousal private (e.g., at home), and low arousal public (e.g., on a date) contexts. Measurement invariance was established across sex, race/ethnicity, and drinking frequency, and convergent and discriminant validity was evaluated via bivariate correlations with social/solitary drinking frequency. High arousal contexts were associated with heavier/binge drinking, whereas high arousal private contexts and low arousal contexts were associated with greater negative consequences. Relations between high arousal contexts and heavier drinking remained above and beyond the overall drinking frequency and social context items. Findings lay the framework for future validation and longitudinal/diary studies to test how (and for whom) relations between physical drinking contexts and drinking behavior operate.

{"title":"Initial Development and Preliminary Validation of the Physical Drinking Contexts Scale.","authors":"Jack T Waddell, Scott E King, William R Corbin","doi":"10.1177/10731911251321930","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251321930","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Literature on the location and contextual features of drinking events (i.e., physical context) remains scant and underdeveloped. This study developed and provided preliminary validation of a measure typical physical drinking contexts. Participants (<i>N</i> = 1,642) self-reported their typical physical drinking context (via items generated), their drinking behavior, demographics, and typical social drinking context. Three samples (total <i>N</i> = 1,642) assessed factor structure, measurement invariance, and validity testing. Factor analyses suggested a four-factor structure, indicative of high arousal private (e.g., at a large house party), high arousal public (e.g., at a concert), low arousal private (e.g., at home), and low arousal public (e.g., on a date) contexts. Measurement invariance was established across sex, race/ethnicity, and drinking frequency, and convergent and discriminant validity was evaluated via bivariate correlations with social/solitary drinking frequency. High arousal contexts were associated with heavier/binge drinking, whereas high arousal private contexts and low arousal contexts were associated with greater negative consequences. Relations between high arousal contexts and heavier drinking remained above and beyond the overall drinking frequency and social context items. Findings lay the framework for future validation and longitudinal/diary studies to test how (and for whom) relations between physical drinking contexts and drinking behavior operate.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251321930"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143742078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Linguistically Compare Test Translations: A Methodological Introduction and Demonstration. 利用人工智能对测试翻译进行语言学比较:方法介绍和演示。
IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-03-29 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251326371
Adam P Natoli

The validity and utility of translated instruments (psychological measures) depend on the quality of their translation, and differences in key linguistic characteristics could introduce bias. Likewise, linguistic differences between instruments designed to measure analogous constructs might contribute to similar instruments possessing dissimilar psychometrics. This article introduces and demonstrates the use of natural language processing (NLP), a subfield of artificial intelligence, to linguistically analyze 13 translations of two psychological measures previously translated into numerous languages. NLP was used to generate estimates reflecting specific linguistic characteristics of test items (emotional tone/intensity, sentiment, valence, arousal, and dominance), which were then compared across translations at both the test- and item-level, as well as between the two instruments. Results revealed that key linguistic characteristics can profoundly vary both within and between tests. Following a discussion of results, the current limitations of this approach are summarized and strategies for advancing this methodology are proposed.

{"title":"Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Linguistically Compare Test Translations: A Methodological Introduction and Demonstration.","authors":"Adam P Natoli","doi":"10.1177/10731911251326371","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251326371","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The validity and utility of translated instruments (psychological measures) depend on the quality of their translation, and differences in key linguistic characteristics could introduce bias. Likewise, linguistic differences between instruments designed to measure analogous constructs might contribute to similar instruments possessing dissimilar psychometrics. This article introduces and demonstrates the use of natural language processing (NLP), a subfield of artificial intelligence, to linguistically analyze 13 translations of two psychological measures previously translated into numerous languages. NLP was used to generate estimates reflecting specific linguistic characteristics of test items (emotional tone/intensity, sentiment, valence, arousal, and dominance), which were then compared across translations at both the test- and item-level, as well as between the two instruments. Results revealed that key linguistic characteristics can profoundly vary both within and between tests. Following a discussion of results, the current limitations of this approach are summarized and strategies for advancing this methodology are proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251326371"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143742079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Scores Demonstrate Poor Structural Properties in Nine Large Non-Clinical Samples.
IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-03-29 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251328604
Wendy C Higgins, Victoria Savalei, Vince Polito, Robert M Ross

The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) is widely used in clinical and non-clinical research. However, the structural properties of RMET scores have yet to be rigorously examined. We analyzed the structural properties of RMET scores in nine existing datasets comprising non-clinical samples ranging from 558 to 9,267 (median = 1,112) participants each. We used confirmatory factor analysis to assess two theoretically derived factor models, exploratory factor analysis to identify possible alternative factor models, and reliability estimates to assess internal consistency. Neither of the theoretically derived models was a good fit for any of the nine datasets, and we were unable to identify any better fitting multidimensional models. Internal consistency metrics were acceptable in six of the nine datasets, but these metrics are difficult to interpret given the uncertain factor structures. Our findings contribute to a growing body of evidence questioning the reliability and validity of RMET scores.

{"title":"Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Scores Demonstrate Poor Structural Properties in Nine Large Non-Clinical Samples.","authors":"Wendy C Higgins, Victoria Savalei, Vince Polito, Robert M Ross","doi":"10.1177/10731911251328604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251328604","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) is widely used in clinical and non-clinical research. However, the structural properties of RMET scores have yet to be rigorously examined. We analyzed the structural properties of RMET scores in nine existing datasets comprising non-clinical samples ranging from 558 to 9,267 (median = 1,112) participants each. We used confirmatory factor analysis to assess two theoretically derived factor models, exploratory factor analysis to identify possible alternative factor models, and reliability estimates to assess internal consistency. Neither of the theoretically derived models was a good fit for any of the nine datasets, and we were unable to identify any better fitting multidimensional models. Internal consistency metrics were acceptable in six of the nine datasets, but these metrics are difficult to interpret given the uncertain factor structures. Our findings contribute to a growing body of evidence questioning the reliability and validity of RMET scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251328604"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143742081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Assessment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1