Disentangling direct vs indirect effects of microbiome manipulations in a habitat-forming marine holobiont.

IF 7.8 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY npj Biofilms and Microbiomes Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1038/s41522-024-00503-x
Alexander Harry McGrath, Kimberley Lema, Suhelen Egan, Georgina Wood, Sebastian Vadillo Gonzalez, Staffan Kjelleberg, Peter D Steinberg, Ezequiel M Marzinelli
{"title":"Disentangling direct vs indirect effects of microbiome manipulations in a habitat-forming marine holobiont.","authors":"Alexander Harry McGrath, Kimberley Lema, Suhelen Egan, Georgina Wood, Sebastian Vadillo Gonzalez, Staffan Kjelleberg, Peter D Steinberg, Ezequiel M Marzinelli","doi":"10.1038/s41522-024-00503-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Host-associated microbiota are critical for eukaryotic host functioning, to the extent that hosts and their associated microbial communities are often considered \"holobionts\". Most studies of holobionts have focused on descriptive approaches or have used model systems, usually in the laboratory, to understand host-microbiome interactions. To advance our understanding of host-microbiota interactions and their wider ecological impacts, we need experimental frameworks that can explore causation in non-model hosts, which often have highly diverse microbiota, and in their natural ecological setting (i.e. in the field). We used a dominant habitat-forming seaweed, Hormosira banksii, to explore these issues and to experimentally test host-microbiota interactions in a non-model holobiont. The experimental protocols were aimed at trying to disentangle microbially mediated effects on hosts from direct effects on hosts associated with the methods employed to manipulate host-microbiota. This was done by disrupting the microbiome, either through removal/disruption using a combination of antimicrobial treatments, or additions of specific taxa via inoculations, or a combination of thew two. The experiments were done in mesocosms and in the field. Three different antibiotic treatments were used to disrupt seaweed-associated microbiota to test whether disturbances of microbiota, particularly bacteria, would negatively affect host performance. Responses of bacteria to these disturbances were complex and differed substantially among treatments, with some antibacterial treatments having little discernible effect. However, the temporal sequence of responses antibiotic treatments, changes in bacterial diversity and subsequent decreases in host performance, strongly suggested an effect of the microbiota on host performance in some treatments, as opposed to direct effects of the antibiotics. To further test these effects, we used 16S-rRNA-gene sequencing to identify bacterial taxa that were either correlated, or uncorrelated, with poor host performance following antibiotic treatment. These were then isolated and used in inoculation experiments, independently or in combination with the previously used antibiotic treatments. Negative effects on host performance were strongest where specific microbial antimicrobials treatments were combined with inoculations of strains that were correlated with poor host performance. For these treatments, negative host effects persisted the entire experimental period (12 days), even though treatments were only applied at the beginning of the experiment. Host performance recovered in all other treatments. These experiments provide a framework for exploring causation and disentangling microbially mediated vs. direct effects on hosts for ecologically important, non-model holobionts in the field. This should allow for better predictions of how these systems will respond to, and potentially mitigate, environmental disturbances in their natural context.</p>","PeriodicalId":19370,"journal":{"name":"npj Biofilms and Microbiomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10980776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Biofilms and Microbiomes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-024-00503-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Host-associated microbiota are critical for eukaryotic host functioning, to the extent that hosts and their associated microbial communities are often considered "holobionts". Most studies of holobionts have focused on descriptive approaches or have used model systems, usually in the laboratory, to understand host-microbiome interactions. To advance our understanding of host-microbiota interactions and their wider ecological impacts, we need experimental frameworks that can explore causation in non-model hosts, which often have highly diverse microbiota, and in their natural ecological setting (i.e. in the field). We used a dominant habitat-forming seaweed, Hormosira banksii, to explore these issues and to experimentally test host-microbiota interactions in a non-model holobiont. The experimental protocols were aimed at trying to disentangle microbially mediated effects on hosts from direct effects on hosts associated with the methods employed to manipulate host-microbiota. This was done by disrupting the microbiome, either through removal/disruption using a combination of antimicrobial treatments, or additions of specific taxa via inoculations, or a combination of thew two. The experiments were done in mesocosms and in the field. Three different antibiotic treatments were used to disrupt seaweed-associated microbiota to test whether disturbances of microbiota, particularly bacteria, would negatively affect host performance. Responses of bacteria to these disturbances were complex and differed substantially among treatments, with some antibacterial treatments having little discernible effect. However, the temporal sequence of responses antibiotic treatments, changes in bacterial diversity and subsequent decreases in host performance, strongly suggested an effect of the microbiota on host performance in some treatments, as opposed to direct effects of the antibiotics. To further test these effects, we used 16S-rRNA-gene sequencing to identify bacterial taxa that were either correlated, or uncorrelated, with poor host performance following antibiotic treatment. These were then isolated and used in inoculation experiments, independently or in combination with the previously used antibiotic treatments. Negative effects on host performance were strongest where specific microbial antimicrobials treatments were combined with inoculations of strains that were correlated with poor host performance. For these treatments, negative host effects persisted the entire experimental period (12 days), even though treatments were only applied at the beginning of the experiment. Host performance recovered in all other treatments. These experiments provide a framework for exploring causation and disentangling microbially mediated vs. direct effects on hosts for ecologically important, non-model holobionts in the field. This should allow for better predictions of how these systems will respond to, and potentially mitigate, environmental disturbances in their natural context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在生境形成的海洋全生物体中区分微生物组操作的直接和间接影响。
宿主相关微生物群对真核生物宿主的功能至关重要,因此宿主及其相关微生物群落通常被视为 "整体生物"。对整体生物的大多数研究都侧重于描述性方法,或使用模型系统(通常是在实验室中)来了解宿主与微生物群的相互作用。为了增进我们对宿主-微生物群相互作用及其更广泛生态影响的了解,我们需要能够在非模型宿主(通常具有高度多样化的微生物群)的自然生态环境(即野外)中探索因果关系的实验框架。我们利用一种主要的生境形成海藻 Hormosira banksii 来探讨这些问题,并在非模型整体生物体中对宿主与微生物群的相互作用进行实验测试。实验方案旨在尝试将微生物介导的对宿主的影响与宿主-微生物区系操纵方法对宿主的直接影响区分开来。具体做法是破坏微生物群,或通过抗微生物处理组合去除/破坏微生物群,或通过接种添加特定类群,或两者结合。实验在中置培养箱和野外进行。实验采用了三种不同的抗生素处理方法来破坏海藻相关的微生物群,以检验微生物群(尤其是细菌)的干扰是否会对宿主的表现产生负面影响。细菌对这些干扰的反应很复杂,不同处理之间差异很大,有些抗菌处理几乎没有明显的影响。然而,抗生素处理、细菌多样性变化和宿主表现随之下降的时间顺序强烈表明,在某些处理中,微生物群对宿主表现有影响,而不是抗生素的直接影响。为了进一步检验这些影响,我们使用 16S-rRNA 基因测序来确定与抗生素治疗后宿主表现不佳相关或不相关的细菌类群。然后,我们分离出这些细菌类群,并在接种实验中将其单独或与先前使用的抗生素处理方法结合使用。当特定微生物抗菌剂处理与接种与宿主表现不佳相关的菌株相结合时,对宿主表现的负面影响最大。在这些处理中,尽管处理只是在实验开始时进行的,但对宿主的负面影响却持续了整个实验期(12 天)。在所有其他处理中,寄主表现都有所恢复。这些实验提供了一个框架,用于探索因果关系,并区分微生物介导与直接影响宿主的关系,以研究生态学上重要的非模式整体生物。这将有助于更好地预测这些系统在自然环境中如何应对并减轻环境干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Biofilms and Microbiomes is a comprehensive platform that promotes research on biofilms and microbiomes across various scientific disciplines. The journal facilitates cross-disciplinary discussions to enhance our understanding of the biology, ecology, and communal functions of biofilms, populations, and communities. It also focuses on applications in the medical, environmental, and engineering domains. The scope of the journal encompasses all aspects of the field, ranging from cell-cell communication and single cell interactions to the microbiomes of humans, animals, plants, and natural and built environments. The journal also welcomes research on the virome, phageome, mycome, and fungome. It publishes both applied science and theoretical work. As an open access and interdisciplinary journal, its primary goal is to publish significant scientific advancements in microbial biofilms and microbiomes. The journal enables discussions that span multiple disciplines and contributes to our understanding of the social behavior of microbial biofilm populations and communities, and their impact on life, human health, and the environment.
期刊最新文献
Integrating respiratory microbiome and host immune response through machine learning for respiratory tract infection diagnosis Protection against DSS-induced colitis in mice through FcεRIα deficiency: the role of altered Lactobacillus Hfq-binding small RNA PqsS regulates Pseudomonas aeruginosa pqs quorum sensing system and virulence Transient colonizing microbes promote gut dysbiosis and functional impairment. Natural killer cell effector function is critical for host defense against alcohol-associated bacterial pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1