[Discrimination-Sensitive Psychotherapy: How High Is The Privilege Awareness Among Psychotherapists?]

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1055/a-2244-7468
Thorsten Krammer, Sabrina Saase, Hendrik Berth, Carolin Kilian
{"title":"[Discrimination-Sensitive Psychotherapy: How High Is The Privilege Awareness Among Psychotherapists?]","authors":"Thorsten Krammer, Sabrina Saase, Hendrik Berth, Carolin Kilian","doi":"10.1055/a-2244-7468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Discrimination can have a negative impact on mental health and thus can play a crucial role in the context of psychotherapy. This paper outlines the potentials and the relevance of an (intersectional) privilege awareness of psychotherapists for a discrimination-sensitive psychotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the privilege awareness of psychotherapists in Germany for the first time as well as its thematization in the training of psychotherapists. In addition, the connection between belonging to a marginalized group and the privilege awareness was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>270 psychotherapists (in training) based in Germany participated in an online survey (2022). Privilege awareness was assessed with an adapted version of the Awareness of Privilege and Oppression Scale-2, translated into German, regarding the following axes of discrimination: heterosexism, classism, and racism. Three self-written items additionally surveyed the thematization of discrimination and privilege in psychotherapy training. The relationship between belonging to a marginalized group and privilege awareness was examined using linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly 65% (N=270) of participants felt unprepared or somewhat unprepared to deal with patients' experiences of discrimination, with approximately 40% (N=270) indicating that discrimination was not addressed in training. Privilege was addressed much less frequently. Belonging to a marginalized group was associated with higher privilege awareness (B=0,47, 95%-confidence interval: 0,27-0,67, F(2, 267)=15,41, p<0,001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need to include the impact of discrimination and privilege on mental health and the therapeutic relationship as an integral part of psychotherapy training to enhance its quality as well as the quality of future psychotherapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2244-7468","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Discrimination can have a negative impact on mental health and thus can play a crucial role in the context of psychotherapy. This paper outlines the potentials and the relevance of an (intersectional) privilege awareness of psychotherapists for a discrimination-sensitive psychotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the privilege awareness of psychotherapists in Germany for the first time as well as its thematization in the training of psychotherapists. In addition, the connection between belonging to a marginalized group and the privilege awareness was investigated.

Methods: 270 psychotherapists (in training) based in Germany participated in an online survey (2022). Privilege awareness was assessed with an adapted version of the Awareness of Privilege and Oppression Scale-2, translated into German, regarding the following axes of discrimination: heterosexism, classism, and racism. Three self-written items additionally surveyed the thematization of discrimination and privilege in psychotherapy training. The relationship between belonging to a marginalized group and privilege awareness was examined using linear regression analysis.

Results: Nearly 65% (N=270) of participants felt unprepared or somewhat unprepared to deal with patients' experiences of discrimination, with approximately 40% (N=270) indicating that discrimination was not addressed in training. Privilege was addressed much less frequently. Belonging to a marginalized group was associated with higher privilege awareness (B=0,47, 95%-confidence interval: 0,27-0,67, F(2, 267)=15,41, p<0,001).

Conclusion: There is a need to include the impact of discrimination and privilege on mental health and the therapeutic relationship as an integral part of psychotherapy training to enhance its quality as well as the quality of future psychotherapies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[对歧视敏感的心理治疗:心理治疗师的特权意识有多强?]
目的歧视会对心理健康产生负面影响,因此在心理治疗中起着至关重要的作用。本文概述了心理治疗师的(交叉)特权意识对于关注歧视的心理治疗的潜力和相关性。本研究旨在首次评估德国心理治疗师的特权意识及其在心理治疗师培训中的主题化。方法:德国的 270 名心理治疗师(正在接受培训)参与了一项在线调查(2022 年)。特权意识通过改编版的 "特权和压迫意识量表-2"(译成德语)进行评估,涉及以下歧视轴心:异性恋主义、阶级歧视和种族主义。此外,还有三个自编项目调查了心理治疗培训中歧视和特权的主题化情况。通过线性回归分析研究了属于边缘化群体与特权意识之间的关系:近65%的参与者(人数=270)认为自己没有准备好或有些没有准备好处理患者的歧视经历,约40%的参与者(人数=270)表示培训中没有涉及歧视问题。特权问题则很少涉及。属于边缘化群体与较高的特权意识相关(B=0,47,95% 置信区间:0,27-0,67,F(2, 267)=15,41, p结论:有必要将歧视和特权对心理健康和治疗关系的影响作为心理治疗培训的一个组成部分,以提高培训质量和未来心理治疗的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
[Learning Evidence-Based Practice - Multi-Perspective Competence Development using the Example of Generalised Anxiety Disorder]. [Utilization of Psychosocial Support for Young Adults with Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors]. [Partnership Status And Prevalence Of Mental Disorders In Women And Men With Cancer]. [Young Adult Cancer Patients (AYA): Preferences for Outpatient Psychosocial Care and Gender-Specific Differences - Results from the AYA-LE study]. [Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1