Adherence to PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines and scope of systematic reviews published in nursing: A cross-sectional analysis

IF 2.4 3区医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Scholarship Pub Date : 2024-03-30 DOI:10.1111/jnu.12969

Gian Carlo Torres PhD, RN, Leila Ledbetter MLIS, AHIP, Sarah Cantrell MLIS, AHIP-D, Anna Rita L. Alomo MALIS, RL, Thomas J. Blodgett PhD, RN, AGACNP-BC, Maria Victoria Bongar MHPEd, RN, Sandy Hatoum MSc-GH, BScN, Steph Hendren MLIS, AHIP, Ritzmond Loa PhD, RN, Sherihan Montaña MHPEd, RN, Earl Francis Sumile PhD, RN, Kathleen M. Turner DNP, RN, Michael V. Relf PhD, RN, AACRN, CNE, ANEF, FAAN

{"title":"Adherence to PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines and scope of systematic reviews published in nursing: A cross-sectional analysis","authors":"Gian Carlo Torres PhD, RN, Leila Ledbetter MLIS, AHIP, Sarah Cantrell MLIS, AHIP-D, Anna Rita L. Alomo MALIS, RL, Thomas J. Blodgett PhD, RN, AGACNP-BC, Maria Victoria Bongar MHPEd, RN, Sandy Hatoum MSc-GH, BScN, Steph Hendren MLIS, AHIP, Ritzmond Loa PhD, RN, Sherihan Montaña MHPEd, RN, Earl Francis Sumile PhD, RN, Kathleen M. Turner DNP, RN, Michael V. Relf PhD, RN, AACRN, CNE, ANEF, FAAN","doi":"10.1111/jnu.12969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Systematic reviews are considered the highest level of evidence that can help guide evidence-informed decisions in nursing practice, education, and even health policy. Systematic review publications have increased from a sporadic few in 1980s to more than 10,000 systematic reviews published every year and around 30,000 registered in prospective registries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional design and a variety of data sources were triangulated to identify the journals from which systematic reviews would be evaluated for adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 reporting guidelines and scope. Specifically, this study used the PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines to assess the reporting of the introduction, methods, information sources and search strategy, study selection process, quality/bias assessments, and results and discussion aspects of the included systematic reviews.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Upon review of the 215 systematic reviews published in 10 top-tier journals in the field of nursing in 2019 and 2020, this study identified several opportunities to improve the reporting of systematic reviews in the context of the 2020 PRISMA statement. Areas of priority for reporting include the following key areas: (1) information sources, (2) search strategies, (3) study selection process, (4) bias reporting, (5) explicit discussion of the implications to policy, and lastly, the need for (6) prospective protocol registration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The use of the PRISMA 2020 guidelines by authors, peer reviewers, and editors can help to ensure the transparent and detailed reporting of systematic reviews published in the nursing literature.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Relevance</h3>\n \n <p>Systematic reviews are considered strong research evidence that can guide evidence-based practice and even clinical decision-making. This paper addresses some common methodological and process issues among systematic reviews that can guide clinicians and practitioners to be more critical in appraising research evidence that can shape nursing practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":"56 4","pages":"531-541"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnu.12969","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Systematic reviews are considered the highest level of evidence that can help guide evidence-informed decisions in nursing practice, education, and even health policy. Systematic review publications have increased from a sporadic few in 1980s to more than 10,000 systematic reviews published every year and around 30,000 registered in prospective registries.

Methods

A cross-sectional design and a variety of data sources were triangulated to identify the journals from which systematic reviews would be evaluated for adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 reporting guidelines and scope. Specifically, this study used the PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines to assess the reporting of the introduction, methods, information sources and search strategy, study selection process, quality/bias assessments, and results and discussion aspects of the included systematic reviews.

Results

Upon review of the 215 systematic reviews published in 10 top-tier journals in the field of nursing in 2019 and 2020, this study identified several opportunities to improve the reporting of systematic reviews in the context of the 2020 PRISMA statement. Areas of priority for reporting include the following key areas: (1) information sources, (2) search strategies, (3) study selection process, (4) bias reporting, (5) explicit discussion of the implications to policy, and lastly, the need for (6) prospective protocol registration.

Discussion

The use of the PRISMA 2020 guidelines by authors, peer reviewers, and editors can help to ensure the transparent and detailed reporting of systematic reviews published in the nursing literature.

Clinical Relevance

Systematic reviews are considered strong research evidence that can guide evidence-based practice and even clinical decision-making. This paper addresses some common methodological and process issues among systematic reviews that can guide clinicians and practitioners to be more critical in appraising research evidence that can shape nursing practice.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

遵守 PRISMA 2020 报告指南和护理领域发表的系统综述的范围：横向分析。

导言：系统综述被认为是最高级别的证据，有助于指导护理实践、教育甚至卫生政策中的循证决策。系统综述的发表量已从 20 世纪 80 年代的零星几篇增加到每年发表 10,000 多篇系统综述，约有 30,000 篇在前瞻性登记册中登记：方法：本研究采用横断面设计，对各种数据源进行三角测量，以确定评估系统综述的期刊是否符合《系统综述与元分析首选报告项目》（PRISMA）2020 的报告指南和范围。具体而言，本研究采用 PRISMA 2020 报告指南来评估所纳入系统综述的引言、方法、信息来源和检索策略、研究选择过程、质量/偏倚评估以及结果和讨论等方面的报告情况：在对 2019 年和 2020 年护理领域 10 种顶级期刊上发表的 215 篇系统综述进行审查后，本研究发现了在 2020 年 PRISMA 声明背景下改进系统综述报告的若干机会。优先报告的领域包括以下关键方面：（1）信息来源；（2）检索策略；（3）研究选择过程；（4）偏倚报告；（5）明确讨论对政策的影响；最后，需要（6）前瞻性方案注册：讨论：作者、同行评审员和编辑使用 PRISMA 2020 指南有助于确保护理文献中发表的系统综述报告透明、详细：系统综述被认为是强有力的研究证据，可以指导循证实践甚至临床决策。本文探讨了系统综述中一些常见的方法和过程问题，可指导临床医生和从业人员以更严谨的态度评估可影响护理实践的研究证据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Nursing Scholarship 医学-护理

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

5.90%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.