Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Perception of the Doctor-Patient Relationship (PREMEPA) Questionnaire in Chronic Multi-Pathological Patients.

IF 2.5 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of Primary Care and Community Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21501319241241198
María Zarza-Arribas, Juan Francisco Menárguez Puche, Rosario Morales López, Josep Xavier Barber Valles, Domingo Luis Orozco Beltrán
{"title":"Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Perception of the Doctor-Patient Relationship (PREMEPA) Questionnaire in Chronic Multi-Pathological Patients.","authors":"María Zarza-Arribas, Juan Francisco Menárguez Puche, Rosario Morales López, Josep Xavier Barber Valles, Domingo Luis Orozco Beltrán","doi":"10.1177/21501319241241198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a cross-cultural adaptation and validation in Primary Care of the PREMEPA doctor-patient relationship perception questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive, cross-sectional study, using self-administered questionnaires. Qualitative validation: an adapted version of the original questionnaire, was adapted to our culture. The process consisted of the evaluation, cross-cultural adaptation and consensus of a group of experts. The questionnaire was piloted on a sample of 32 patients diagnosed with at least 2 chronic pathologies.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Cognitive piloting, comprehensibility assessment, content validation and internal consistency analysis using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Quantitative validation: the internal consistency, construct validity and validity of the questionnaire were studied by means of a confirmatory factor analysis developed in a multicenter study, randomly selecting 202 patients with at least 2 chronic pathologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Content validity of the new Spanish version was confirmed to be adequate. Comprehensibility and internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient = 0.78) were adequate. The confirmatory factor analysis showed good dimensionality, factor relationship and internal consistency, as well as acceptable construct validity. The final result was a 13-item questionnaire consisting of 2 dimensions, which explain 58.5% of the variance: participation in decision-making (accounting for 45.2% of the variance) and person-centered communication (encompassing courtesy, empathy, humanity, and trust).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This adapted version of the PREMEPA questionnaire can be considered valid for use in the Spanish population with a history of chronic pathology. This version of PREMEPA provides a new instrument to understand and improve chronic patient care, which can improve the doctor-patient relationship, encouraging adherence to treatment and enhancing health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"21501319241241198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10981856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241241198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a cross-cultural adaptation and validation in Primary Care of the PREMEPA doctor-patient relationship perception questionnaire.

Design: Descriptive, cross-sectional study, using self-administered questionnaires. Qualitative validation: an adapted version of the original questionnaire, was adapted to our culture. The process consisted of the evaluation, cross-cultural adaptation and consensus of a group of experts. The questionnaire was piloted on a sample of 32 patients diagnosed with at least 2 chronic pathologies.

Measures: Cognitive piloting, comprehensibility assessment, content validation and internal consistency analysis using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Quantitative validation: the internal consistency, construct validity and validity of the questionnaire were studied by means of a confirmatory factor analysis developed in a multicenter study, randomly selecting 202 patients with at least 2 chronic pathologies.

Results: Content validity of the new Spanish version was confirmed to be adequate. Comprehensibility and internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient = 0.78) were adequate. The confirmatory factor analysis showed good dimensionality, factor relationship and internal consistency, as well as acceptable construct validity. The final result was a 13-item questionnaire consisting of 2 dimensions, which explain 58.5% of the variance: participation in decision-making (accounting for 45.2% of the variance) and person-centered communication (encompassing courtesy, empathy, humanity, and trust).

Conclusions: This adapted version of the PREMEPA questionnaire can be considered valid for use in the Spanish population with a history of chronic pathology. This version of PREMEPA provides a new instrument to understand and improve chronic patient care, which can improve the doctor-patient relationship, encouraging adherence to treatment and enhancing health outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性多病理患者对医患关系感知(PREMEPA)问卷的跨文化适应性和验证。
目的对 PREMEPA 医患关系感知问卷进行跨文化改编,并在基层医疗机构进行验证:描述性横断面研究,采用自填式问卷。定性验证:根据我国文化对原始问卷进行改编。这一过程包括专家组的评估、跨文化调整和共识。问卷在 32 名至少患有两种慢性病的患者中进行了试点:认知试点、可理解性评估、内容验证以及使用克朗巴赫α系数进行的内部一致性分析。定量验证:在一项多中心研究中,随机抽取了 202 名至少患有两种慢性病的患者,通过确认性因子分析对问卷的内部一致性、结构效度和有效性进行了研究:结果:新版西班牙文问卷的内容效度被证实是适当的。可理解性和内部一致性(Cronbach's α coefficient = 0.78)良好。确认性因子分析显示出良好的维度、因子关系和内部一致性,以及可接受的建构效度。最后得出的结果是由两个维度组成的 13 个项目的问卷,这两个维度解释了 58.5%的方差:参与决策(占方差的 45.2%)和以人为本的沟通(包括礼貌、同情、人性化和信任):这一改编版 PREMEPA 问卷可用于有慢性病史的西班牙人群。该版本的 PREMEPA 为了解和改善慢性病患者的护理提供了一种新的工具,可以改善医患关系,鼓励患者坚持治疗,提高健康水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Merging Law and Medicine: Patient Attitudes About and Experiences with Social Needs Screening and Medical-Legal Partnerships in Primary Care. Understanding Experiences of First Contact Physiotherapy in General Practice: A Realist Qualitative Study. The Effects of a Health Literacy Promotion Program on Health Behaviors and Blood Pressure Levels Among Uncontrolled Hypertensive Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Dynamics of Lifestyle Counseling for Chronic Diseases Within and Between General Practices and Social Work Services Causal Loop Diagram and Points for Improvement. "The resources are there, it's just not sufficient:" Primary Care Team Members and Their Experiences with Connecting Patients to Needed Resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1