How demand-side management can shape electricity generation capacity planning

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Utilities Policy Pub Date : 2024-03-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jup.2024.101748
Masoumeh Amirifard , Ronald A. Sinton , Sarah Kurtz
{"title":"How demand-side management can shape electricity generation capacity planning","authors":"Masoumeh Amirifard ,&nbsp;Ronald A. Sinton ,&nbsp;Sarah Kurtz","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2024.101748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forward-looking strategies for Demand Side Management (DSM) can accelerate the clean energy transition and reduce carbon emissions if electricity load can be shaped to be better matched to the hourly availability of renewable resources. Time-varying rates are increasingly used to motivate load shifting, capitalizing on the increasing size of loads that can be easily shifted, such as electric vehicle charging and electric heat pumps. This study analyzes the hourly availability of current and renewable resources for two representative electricity grids in the USA. While many demand-management programs are currently designed to shift load to nighttime when demand is low, to use low-cost PV the opposite shift into daytime will be preferred. Given that investments in electricity generation capacity shape the grid for decades, generation capacity planning should proactively anticipate how DSM programs (and associated load shapes) will change as the generation mix changes. These future load shapes determine the optimal resources to be acquired and can be modified by DSM to facilitate variable renewable integration. Ongoing regulatory proceedings in Colorado are described as a case study for an existing decision-making process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724000419/pdfft?md5=a2f976acda3fbe61b4ace561e2fbae36&pid=1-s2.0-S0957178724000419-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724000419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forward-looking strategies for Demand Side Management (DSM) can accelerate the clean energy transition and reduce carbon emissions if electricity load can be shaped to be better matched to the hourly availability of renewable resources. Time-varying rates are increasingly used to motivate load shifting, capitalizing on the increasing size of loads that can be easily shifted, such as electric vehicle charging and electric heat pumps. This study analyzes the hourly availability of current and renewable resources for two representative electricity grids in the USA. While many demand-management programs are currently designed to shift load to nighttime when demand is low, to use low-cost PV the opposite shift into daytime will be preferred. Given that investments in electricity generation capacity shape the grid for decades, generation capacity planning should proactively anticipate how DSM programs (and associated load shapes) will change as the generation mix changes. These future load shapes determine the optimal resources to be acquired and can be modified by DSM to facilitate variable renewable integration. Ongoing regulatory proceedings in Colorado are described as a case study for an existing decision-making process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需求侧管理如何影响发电能力规划
如果能够使电力负荷与可再生能源的小时可用性更好地匹配,需求侧管理(DSM)的前瞻性战略就能加快清洁能源转型并减少碳排放。随着电动汽车充电和电热泵等可轻松转移的负荷规模不断扩大,时变费率越来越多地被用于激励负荷转移。本研究分析了美国两个具有代表性的电网的当前资源和可再生资源的每小时可用性。虽然目前许多需求管理计划都是在需求低时将负荷转移到夜间,但为了使用低成本的光伏发电,最好将负荷反向转移到白天。鉴于发电能力投资对电网的影响长达数十年,发电能力规划应主动预测 DSM 计划(以及相关的负荷形状)将如何随着发电组合的变化而变化。这些未来的负荷形态决定了需要获取的最佳资源,并可通过 DSM 进行修改,以促进可变可再生能源的整合。科罗拉多州正在进行的监管程序被描述为现有决策过程的案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
期刊最新文献
Performance benchmarking of European postal incumbents with TOPSIS and BMW-TOPSIS Electricity security in Uganda: Measurement and policy priorities The digital economy and energy poverty in Central and Eastern Europe Preserving competition and economic welfare in Israel's PV market Organizational models for the decommissioning of nuclear power plants: Lessons from the United Kingdom and the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1