Effects of adding early cooperation and a work-place dialogue meeting to primary care management for sick-listed patients with stress-related disorders: CO-WORK-CARE-Stress - a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-31 DOI:10.1080/02813432.2024.2329212
C Björkelund, E-L Petersson, I Svenningsson, A Saxvik, L Wiegner, G Hensing, I H Jonsdottir, M Larsson, C Wikberg, N Ariai, S Nejati, D Hange
{"title":"Effects of adding early cooperation and a work-place dialogue meeting to primary care management for sick-listed patients with stress-related disorders: CO-WORK-CARE-Stress - a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.","authors":"C Björkelund, E-L Petersson, I Svenningsson, A Saxvik, L Wiegner, G Hensing, I H Jonsdottir, M Larsson, C Wikberg, N Ariai, S Nejati, D Hange","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2329212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether intensified cooperation between general practitioner (GP), care manager and rehabilitation coordinator (RC) for patients sick-listed for stress-related mental disorder, combined with a person-centred dialogue meeting with employer, could reduce sick-leave days compared with usual care manager contact.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial, randomisation at primary care centre (PCC) level.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>PCCs in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden, with care manager organisation.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Of 30 invited PCCs, 28 (93%) accepted the invitation and recruited 258 patients newly sick-listed due to stress-related mental disorder (<i>n</i> = 142 intervention, <i>n</i> = 116 control PCCs).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Cooperation between GP, care manager and rehabilitation coordinator from start of illness notification plus a person-centred dialogue meeting between patient and employer within 3 months. Regular contact with care manager was continued at the control PCCs.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>12-months net and gross number of sick-leave days. Secondary outcomes: Symptoms of stress, depression, anxiety; work ability and health related quality of life (EQ-5D) over 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between intervention and control groups after 12 months: days on sick-leave (12-months net sick-leave days, intervention, mean = 110.7 days (95% confidence interval (CI) 82.6 - 138.8); control, mean = 99.1 days (95% CI 73.9 - 124.3)), stress, depression, or anxiety symptoms, work ability or EQ-5D. There were no significant differences between intervention and control groups concerning proportion on sick-leave after 3, 6, 12 months. At 3 months 64.8% were on sick-leave in intervention group vs 54.3% in control group; 6 months 38% vs 32.8%, and12 months 16.9% vs 15.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased cooperation at the PCC between GP, care manager and RC for stress-related mental disorder coupled with an early workplace contact in the form of a person-centred dialogue meeting does not reduce days of sick-leave or speed up rehabilitation.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03250026 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03250026?tab=results#publicationsCO-WORK-CAREFirst Posted: August 15, 2017. Recruitment of PCCs: September 2017. Inclusion of patients from December 2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"378-392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2329212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether intensified cooperation between general practitioner (GP), care manager and rehabilitation coordinator (RC) for patients sick-listed for stress-related mental disorder, combined with a person-centred dialogue meeting with employer, could reduce sick-leave days compared with usual care manager contact.

Design: Pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial, randomisation at primary care centre (PCC) level.

Setting: PCCs in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden, with care manager organisation.

Participants: Of 30 invited PCCs, 28 (93%) accepted the invitation and recruited 258 patients newly sick-listed due to stress-related mental disorder (n = 142 intervention, n = 116 control PCCs).

Intervention: Cooperation between GP, care manager and rehabilitation coordinator from start of illness notification plus a person-centred dialogue meeting between patient and employer within 3 months. Regular contact with care manager was continued at the control PCCs.

Main outcome measures: 12-months net and gross number of sick-leave days. Secondary outcomes: Symptoms of stress, depression, anxiety; work ability and health related quality of life (EQ-5D) over 12 months.

Results: There were no significant differences between intervention and control groups after 12 months: days on sick-leave (12-months net sick-leave days, intervention, mean = 110.7 days (95% confidence interval (CI) 82.6 - 138.8); control, mean = 99.1 days (95% CI 73.9 - 124.3)), stress, depression, or anxiety symptoms, work ability or EQ-5D. There were no significant differences between intervention and control groups concerning proportion on sick-leave after 3, 6, 12 months. At 3 months 64.8% were on sick-leave in intervention group vs 54.3% in control group; 6 months 38% vs 32.8%, and12 months 16.9% vs 15.5%.

Conclusion: Increased cooperation at the PCC between GP, care manager and RC for stress-related mental disorder coupled with an early workplace contact in the form of a person-centred dialogue meeting does not reduce days of sick-leave or speed up rehabilitation.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03250026 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03250026?tab=results#publicationsCO-WORK-CAREFirst Posted: August 15, 2017. Recruitment of PCCs: September 2017. Inclusion of patients from December 2017.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在初级保健管理中增加早期合作和工作场所对话会议对列入病历的压力相关疾病患者的影响:CO-WORK-CARE-Stress - 一项务实的分组随机对照试验。
目的研究全科医生(GP)、护理经理和康复协调员(RC)之间的强化合作,结合以人为本的与雇主的对话会议,与通常的护理经理联系相比,是否可以减少病假天数:设计:务实的群组随机对照试验,在初级医疗中心(PCC)层面进行随机化:地点:瑞典 Västra Götaland 地区有护理经理组织的初级保健中心:在30家受邀的初级保健中心中,28家(93%)接受了邀请,并招募了258名因压力相关精神障碍而被列入新病例的患者(n = 142家干预型初级保健中心,n = 116家对照型初级保健中心):干预措施:全科医生、护理经理和康复协调员从疾病通知开始合作,患者和雇主在 3 个月内举行以人为本的对话会议。对照组 PCC 继续与护理经理保持定期联系:12 个月的病假净天数和总天数。次要结果:次要结果:12 个月内的压力、抑郁、焦虑症状;工作能力和与健康相关的生活质量(EQ-5D):12 个月后,干预组和对照组在病假天数(12 个月净病假天数,干预组,平均 = 110.7 天(95% 置信区间 (CI) 82.6 - 138.8);对照组,平均 = 99.1 天(95% 置信区间 (CI) 73.9 - 124.3))、压力、抑郁或焦虑症状、工作能力或 EQ-5D 方面没有明显差异。3、6、12 个月后,干预组和对照组的病假比例没有明显差异。3个月后,干预组病假比例为64.8%,对照组为54.3%;6个月后,干预组病假比例为38%,对照组为32.8%;12个月后,干预组病假比例为16.9%,对照组为15.5%:全科医生、护理经理和康复中心之间在PCC上加强合作治疗压力相关性精神障碍,同时以 "以人为本 "的对话会议形式及早与工作场所联系,并不能减少病假天数或加快康复:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03250026 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03250026?tab=results#publicationsCO-WORK-CAREFirst 发布:2017年8月15日。招募 PCC:2017年9月。纳入患者时间:2017 年 12 月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
期刊最新文献
Physicians' intentions to use digital tools - a comparative survey, before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, in Southern Sweden. Primary healthcare professionals' attitudes toward patients with current or previous drug use. Diagnostic methods and written advice for acute otitis media in primary health care. Parents of children with atopic diseases - experiences with care and the interaction with healthcare professionals over time. Experiences of rehabilitation coordination among people on sick leave with mental health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1