Barriers to medication error reporting in a federally qualified health center

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American Pharmacists Association Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.japh.2024.102079
{"title":"Barriers to medication error reporting in a federally qualified health center","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention Categories of Errors health professionals are most likely to report and characterize what barriers to medication error reporting influence decisions to report and the extent they do so at a large federally qualified health center (FQHC).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective, cross-sectional, survey.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and participants</h3><div>A total of 161 medical professionals at a large FQHC clinic with a small pharmacy team.</div></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><div>Survey responses to explore respondent understanding of medication error categories and the influence of barriers to medication error reporting on their decision to report.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-six (22.4%) respondents completed the survey. Nearly 40% of respondents would not report a near-miss error and were influenced by workplace/environmental barriers significantly more than those who would report. Regardless of reporting experience or patient-care role, assessed barrier categories influence the decision to report similarly.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Near-miss medication errors are inconsistently reported. Efforts to improve reporting should emphasize addressing workplace/environmental barriers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124000992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention Categories of Errors health professionals are most likely to report and characterize what barriers to medication error reporting influence decisions to report and the extent they do so at a large federally qualified health center (FQHC).

Design

Prospective, cross-sectional, survey.

Setting and participants

A total of 161 medical professionals at a large FQHC clinic with a small pharmacy team.

Outcome measures

Survey responses to explore respondent understanding of medication error categories and the influence of barriers to medication error reporting on their decision to report.

Results

Thirty-six (22.4%) respondents completed the survey. Nearly 40% of respondents would not report a near-miss error and were influenced by workplace/environmental barriers significantly more than those who would report. Regardless of reporting experience or patient-care role, assessed barrier categories influence the decision to report similarly.

Conclusion

Near-miss medication errors are inconsistently reported. Efforts to improve reporting should emphasize addressing workplace/environmental barriers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联邦合格保健中心报告用药错误的障碍(联邦合格保健中心 MEET 的障碍)。
众所周知,住院病人和初级保健诊所报告用药错误的障碍可分为心理、后勤、知识和工作场所等方面。在药房服务有限的联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC),这些障碍还没有得到很好的探讨:这项前瞻性横断面研究调查了一家拥有小型药房团队的大型 FQHC 诊所的 161 名医疗专业人员,以探讨他们对用药错误类别的理解以及用药错误报告障碍对其报告决定的影响:36 名受访者(22.4%)完成了调查。近 40% 的受访者不会报告险些发生的错误,他们受到工作场所/环境障碍影响的程度明显高于愿意报告的受访者。无论报告经验或患者护理角色如何,评估的障碍类别都会对报告决定产生类似的影响:结论:近乎失误的用药错误报告并不一致。改善报告的工作应强调解决工作场所/环境的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating a Generative Artificial Intelligence Accuracy in Providing Medication Instructions from Smartphone Images. Beyond the Fill: Navigating Pharmacy's Technological Future in 2050. Bringing Providers into the Community Pharmacy: Experiential Education. Feasibility of reaching populations at high risk for HIV in community pharmacies A shared passion for providing care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1