3D evaluation of cranial and dentofacial morphological differences between individuals with mouth breathing and nasal breathing

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101854
{"title":"3D evaluation of cranial and dentofacial morphological differences between individuals with mouth breathing and nasal breathing","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The present study aimed to identify the morphological differences in cranial and dentofacial structures between individuals with mouth-breathing and nasal-breathing.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div><span>The study included 120 individuals, 60 each in the nasal breathing<span> (NB) and mouth breathing (MB) groups. 3D stereophotogrammetry, lateral </span></span>cephalometric radiographs, and intraoral examination results were recorded by the researchers to determine the morphological differences between the MB group and the NB group. The study utilized cephalometric radiographs for 2D hard tissue measurements and 3D stereophotogrammetric records for linear and angular measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Statistically significant differences were found between the NB and MB groups’ SNB angles (respectively, 79.3 ± 3.04, 76.6 ± 4.24, and <em>p</em> <em>=</em> <em>0.002</em>). Also, the NB group's SN-GoGn angle was lower than the MB group's (respectively, 31.5 ± 5.12, 36.0 ± 5.55, and <em>p</em> <em>=</em> <em>0.002</em>). Considering the Jarabak ratio, the NB group's Jarabak ratio was higher than the MB group (respectively,65.7 ± 4.16, 62.6 ± 4.10, and <em>p</em> <em>=</em> <em>0.014</em>). In 3D stereophotogrammetry measurements, increased Li-Me’ was detected in the MB group than in NB group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Mouth breathing results in significant morphological differences that affect the development of both soft tissues and skeletal structures. Orthodontists utilize these characteristic features observed in mouth-breathing anomalies for early diagnosis and consider referring their patients for medical treatment of mouth breathing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"125 5","pages":"Article 101854"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785524000909","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The present study aimed to identify the morphological differences in cranial and dentofacial structures between individuals with mouth-breathing and nasal-breathing.

Materials and Methods

The study included 120 individuals, 60 each in the nasal breathing (NB) and mouth breathing (MB) groups. 3D stereophotogrammetry, lateral cephalometric radiographs, and intraoral examination results were recorded by the researchers to determine the morphological differences between the MB group and the NB group. The study utilized cephalometric radiographs for 2D hard tissue measurements and 3D stereophotogrammetric records for linear and angular measurements.

Results

Statistically significant differences were found between the NB and MB groups’ SNB angles (respectively, 79.3 ± 3.04, 76.6 ± 4.24, and p = 0.002). Also, the NB group's SN-GoGn angle was lower than the MB group's (respectively, 31.5 ± 5.12, 36.0 ± 5.55, and p = 0.002). Considering the Jarabak ratio, the NB group's Jarabak ratio was higher than the MB group (respectively,65.7 ± 4.16, 62.6 ± 4.10, and p = 0.014). In 3D stereophotogrammetry measurements, increased Li-Me’ was detected in the MB group than in NB group.

Conclusion

Mouth breathing results in significant morphological differences that affect the development of both soft tissues and skeletal structures. Orthodontists utilize these characteristic features observed in mouth-breathing anomalies for early diagnosis and consider referring their patients for medical treatment of mouth breathing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对口呼吸者和鼻呼吸者颅骨和颌面形态差异的 3d 评估。
导言本研究旨在确定口呼吸者和鼻呼吸者在头颅和颌面部结构方面的形态差异:研究对象包括 120 人,鼻呼吸(NB)组和口呼吸(MB)组各 60 人。研究人员记录了三维立体摄影测量、头颅侧位X光片和口腔内检查结果,以确定 MB 组和 NB 组之间的形态差异。研究利用头颅X光片进行二维硬组织测量,利用三维立体摄影测量记录进行线性和角度测量:结果:NB 组和 MB 组的 SNB 角度差异有统计学意义(分别为 79.3±3.04、76.6±4.24,P=0.002)。此外,NB 组的 SN-GoGn 角也低于 MB 组(分别为 31.5±5.12、36.0±5.55,P=0.002)。从Jarabak比值来看,NB组的Jarabak比值高于MB组(分别为65.7±4.16,62.6±4.10,P=0.014)。在三维立体摄影测量中,MB 组的 Li-Me' 比 NB 组增加:结论:口呼吸会导致明显的形态差异,影响软组织和骨骼结构的发育。正畸医生可利用在口呼吸异常中观察到的这些特征进行早期诊断,并考虑让患者接受口呼吸医学治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents Is panoramic radiography adequate for diagnosing coronoid process hyperplasia? A case series Vascular complications with necrotic lesions following filler injections: Literature systematic review Traumatic ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophilia (TUGSE): Case report of a 63-year-old male patient with a rare self-healing oral mucosal lesion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1