Influence of tutor interventions and group process on medical students' engagement in problem-based learning.

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1111/medu.15387
Salah Eldin Kassab, Hossam Hamdy, Silvia Mamede, Henk Schmidt
{"title":"Influence of tutor interventions and group process on medical students' engagement in problem-based learning.","authors":"Salah Eldin Kassab, Hossam Hamdy, Silvia Mamede, Henk Schmidt","doi":"10.1111/medu.15387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Student engagement is influenced by several variables, among which are the teaching styles employed by faculty. In problem-based learning (PBL), the role of faculty is to facilitate the learning of the tutorial group as they work through clinical problems. However, the influence of tutor intervention styles and group process on engagement of students in PBL tutorials is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted with year 2 and 3 medical students (n = 176) in PBL tutorial groups at the end of an integrated PBL course. Students evaluated their behavioural, cognitive and emotional engagement in PBL tutorials using a pre-validated 11-item questionnaire. Students also filled in a modified version of a previously published tutor intervention profile (TIP) questionnaire. The modified TIP questionnaire represents three constructs (1) steering the learning process (6 items), (2) stimulating student autonomy (4 items) and (3) establishing relatedness with students (3 items). In addition, PBL group process was evaluated using a 5-item nominal scale: (1) tutorial atmosphere, (2) listening and information sharing, (3) group performance, (4) decision making and (5) reaction to leadership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Establishing sense of relatedness in the group by PBL tutors was the most important predictor of emotional engagement (F = 41.213, ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.191, β = 0.438, P = 0.000). On the other hand, steering the learning process was a significant predictor of behavioural engagement (F = 19.0, ΔR<sup>2</sup>=0.098, β = 0.314, P = 0.000). However, stimulating student autonomy was not a significant predictor of student engagement in PBL tutorials. On the other hand, enhancing the group process in PBL tutorials significantly predicts student engagement with strong impact on emotional and cognitive engagement of students.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Establishing the sense of relatedness in the group and steering the learning process by PBL tutors as well as improving PBL group process are significant predictors of student engagement in PBL tutorials with emotional and cognitive engagement being the most sensitive variables affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15387","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Student engagement is influenced by several variables, among which are the teaching styles employed by faculty. In problem-based learning (PBL), the role of faculty is to facilitate the learning of the tutorial group as they work through clinical problems. However, the influence of tutor intervention styles and group process on engagement of students in PBL tutorials is unclear.

Methods: The study was conducted with year 2 and 3 medical students (n = 176) in PBL tutorial groups at the end of an integrated PBL course. Students evaluated their behavioural, cognitive and emotional engagement in PBL tutorials using a pre-validated 11-item questionnaire. Students also filled in a modified version of a previously published tutor intervention profile (TIP) questionnaire. The modified TIP questionnaire represents three constructs (1) steering the learning process (6 items), (2) stimulating student autonomy (4 items) and (3) establishing relatedness with students (3 items). In addition, PBL group process was evaluated using a 5-item nominal scale: (1) tutorial atmosphere, (2) listening and information sharing, (3) group performance, (4) decision making and (5) reaction to leadership.

Results: Establishing sense of relatedness in the group by PBL tutors was the most important predictor of emotional engagement (F = 41.213, ΔR2 = 0.191, β = 0.438, P = 0.000). On the other hand, steering the learning process was a significant predictor of behavioural engagement (F = 19.0, ΔR2=0.098, β = 0.314, P = 0.000). However, stimulating student autonomy was not a significant predictor of student engagement in PBL tutorials. On the other hand, enhancing the group process in PBL tutorials significantly predicts student engagement with strong impact on emotional and cognitive engagement of students.

Conclusions: Establishing the sense of relatedness in the group and steering the learning process by PBL tutors as well as improving PBL group process are significant predictors of student engagement in PBL tutorials with emotional and cognitive engagement being the most sensitive variables affected.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导师干预和小组进程对医学生参与问题式学习的影响。
引言学生的参与度受多个变量的影响,其中包括教师采用的教学风格。在基于问题的学习(PBL)中,教师的作用是促进辅导小组在解决临床问题过程中的学习。然而,辅导员的干预方式和小组进程对学生参与 PBL 辅导的影响尚不清楚:研究对象为二年级和三年级医学生(n = 176),他们在综合 PBL 课程结束后参加了 PBL 辅导小组。学生们使用一份预先验证过的11项调查问卷,对自己在PBL教程中的行为、认知和情感参与度进行了评估。学生们还填写了之前发布的辅导员干预情况(TIP)问卷的修改版。修改后的 TIP 问卷包括三个方面:(1) 引导学习过程(6 个项目);(2) 激发学生自主性(4 个项目);(3) 与学生建立联系(3 个项目)。此外,还使用 5 个项目的名义量表对 PBL 小组过程进行了评估:(1) 辅导氛围;(2) 倾听和信息共享;(3) 小组表现;(4) 决策;(5) 对领导的反应:结果:PBL 辅导教师在小组中建立亲切感是预测情感投入的最重要因素(F = 41.213,ΔR2 = 0.191,β = 0.438,P = 0.000)。另一方面,引导学习过程对行为参与有显著的预测作用(F = 19.0,ΔR2 = 0.098,β = 0.314,P = 0.000)。然而,激发学生自主性对学生参与 PBL 辅导的预测作用并不明显。另一方面,增强 PBL 辅导中的小组过程对学生的参与度有明显的预测作用,对学生的情感和认知参与度有很大的影响:结论:PBL 辅导教师在小组中建立关联感和引导学习过程,以及改进 PBL 小组过程,对学生参与 PBL 辅导有重要的预测作用,而情感和认知参与是受影响最敏感的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
A realist evaluation of prospective entrustment decisions in paediatric residency clinical competency committees. Putting 'leader' back into leadership training. Supporting resident inbox management with screen-casted videos. Enhancing telehealth Objective Structured Clinical Examination fidelity with integrated Electronic Health Record simulation. Equity, diversity, and inclusion in entrustable professional activities based assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1