Validation of the Italian version of a patient-reported outcome measure for Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-04-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0301452
Eleonora Diella, Maria Grazia D'Angelo, Cristina Stefan, Giulia Girardi, Roberta Morganti, Andrea Martinuzzi, Emilia Biffi
{"title":"Validation of the Italian version of a patient-reported outcome measure for Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.","authors":"Eleonora Diella, Maria Grazia D'Angelo, Cristina Stefan, Giulia Girardi, Roberta Morganti, Andrea Martinuzzi, Emilia Biffi","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0301452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are recognized as valuable measures in the clinical setting. In 2018 we developed the Italian version of the \"Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia-Self Notion and Perception Questionnaire\" (HSP-SNAP), a disease-specific questionnaire that collects personal perception on motor symptoms related to HSP such as stiffness, weakness, imbalance, reduced endurance, fatigue and pain. In this study our primary aim was to assess the questionnaire validity and reliability. Our secondary aim was to characterize the symptoms \"perceived\" by patients with HSP and compare them with those \"perceived\" by age-matched healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 12-item HSP-SNAP questionnaire was submitted to 20 external judges for comprehensibility and to 15 external judges for content validity assessment. We recruited 40 subjects with HSP and asked them to fill the questionnaire twice for test-retest procedure. They also completed the Medical Outcome Survey Short Form (SF-36) and were evaluated by the Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale and the Six-Minute Walk Test. We also recruited 44 healthy subjects who completed the HSP-SNAP once to test score variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HSP-SNAP content validity index was high (0.8±0.1) and the test-retest analysis showed high reliability (ICC = 0.94). The mean HSP-SNAP score (score range 0-48) of the HSP group was 22.2±7.8, which was significantly lower than healthy subjects (43.1±6.3). The most commonly perceived symptom was stiffness, followed by weakness and imbalance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although HSP-SNAP does not investigate non-motor symptoms and we validated only its Italian version, it showed good validity and reliability and it could be used in combination with other objective outcome measures for clinical purposes or as endpoints for future clinical rehabilitation studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial Registration: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT04256681. Registered 3 February 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 4","pages":"e0301452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are recognized as valuable measures in the clinical setting. In 2018 we developed the Italian version of the "Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia-Self Notion and Perception Questionnaire" (HSP-SNAP), a disease-specific questionnaire that collects personal perception on motor symptoms related to HSP such as stiffness, weakness, imbalance, reduced endurance, fatigue and pain. In this study our primary aim was to assess the questionnaire validity and reliability. Our secondary aim was to characterize the symptoms "perceived" by patients with HSP and compare them with those "perceived" by age-matched healthy subjects.

Methods: The 12-item HSP-SNAP questionnaire was submitted to 20 external judges for comprehensibility and to 15 external judges for content validity assessment. We recruited 40 subjects with HSP and asked them to fill the questionnaire twice for test-retest procedure. They also completed the Medical Outcome Survey Short Form (SF-36) and were evaluated by the Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale and the Six-Minute Walk Test. We also recruited 44 healthy subjects who completed the HSP-SNAP once to test score variability.

Results: The HSP-SNAP content validity index was high (0.8±0.1) and the test-retest analysis showed high reliability (ICC = 0.94). The mean HSP-SNAP score (score range 0-48) of the HSP group was 22.2±7.8, which was significantly lower than healthy subjects (43.1±6.3). The most commonly perceived symptom was stiffness, followed by weakness and imbalance.

Conclusion: Although HSP-SNAP does not investigate non-motor symptoms and we validated only its Italian version, it showed good validity and reliability and it could be used in combination with other objective outcome measures for clinical purposes or as endpoints for future clinical rehabilitation studies.

Trial registration: Trial Registration: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT04256681. Registered 3 February 2020.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证意大利语版本的遗传性痉挛性截瘫患者报告结果测量法。
背景和目的:患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)被认为是临床环境中有价值的测量方法。2018 年,我们开发了意大利语版的 "遗传性痉挛性截瘫--自我概念和感知问卷"(HSP-SNAP),这是一份疾病特异性问卷,收集与 HSP 相关的运动症状(如僵硬、虚弱、不平衡、耐力下降、疲劳和疼痛)的个人感知。本研究的主要目的是评估问卷的有效性和可靠性。我们的次要目的是描述 HSP 患者 "感知到的 "症状的特征,并将其与年龄匹配的健康受试者 "感知到的 "症状进行比较:方法:我们将 12 个项目的 HSP-SNAP 问卷提交给 20 位外部评委进行可理解性评估,并提交给 15 位外部评委进行内容有效性评估。我们招募了 40 名患有 HSP 的受试者,要求他们填写两次问卷以进行重测。他们还填写了医疗结果调查简表(SF-36),并接受了痉挛性截瘫评定量表和六分钟步行测试的评估。我们还招募了 44 名健康受试者,让他们完成一次 HSP-SNAP 测试,以检验得分的变异性:结果:HSP-SNAP内容效度指数较高(0.8±0.1),重测分析显示其可靠性较高(ICC = 0.94)。HSP 组的 HSP-SNAP 平均得分(得分范围 0-48)为 22.2±7.8,明显低于健康人(43.1±6.3)。最常见的症状是僵硬,其次是无力和不平衡:尽管HSP-SNAP不调查非运动症状,而且我们只验证了其意大利语版本,但它显示出良好的有效性和可靠性,可与其他客观结果测量相结合用于临床目的,或作为未来临床康复研究的终点:试验注册:试验注册:试验注册:ClinicalTrial.gov,NCT04256681。2020年2月3日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with receiving a Functional Disorder diagnostic label: A systematic review. Fast surface reconstruction algorithm with adaptive step size. The impact of the reform of rural collective property rights system on villagers' public participation: An empirical study based on CRRS 2020 data. Identification of key regulators in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using network theoretical approach. Using machine learning to forecast peak health care service demand in real-time during the 2022-23 winter season: A pilot in England, UK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1