Student Health Services at Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Predominantly Black Institutions in the United States.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Equity Pub Date : 2024-03-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2023.0219
Susan D Mueller, Melissa A Sutherland, M Katherine Hutchinson, Bing Si, Yu Ding, Somatra L Connolly
{"title":"Student Health Services at Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Predominantly Black Institutions in the United States.","authors":"Susan D Mueller, Melissa A Sutherland, M Katherine Hutchinson, Bing Si, Yu Ding, Somatra L Connolly","doi":"10.1089/heq.2023.0219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Student health services are associated with improved health outcomes and academic success, particularly among under-resourced college populations. This study compared student health services at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Predominantly Black Institutions (PBIs) and identified factors associated with the availability of comprehensive health services (CHS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of 2022 data from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), the Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs) Directory, and the websites of HBCUs and PBIs (<i>n</i>=167). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were undertaken to identify institutional variables associated with providing CHS. Institutional variables included college type (public vs. private), MSI category (HBCU vs. PBI), undergraduate enrollment, location, and proportion of Pell grant recipients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 13% of HBCUs and 26% of PBIs offered no student health services; 65% of HBCUs and 39% of PBIs offered on-campus CHS with prescribing providers. Four-year HBCUs were five times more likely than 4-year PBIs to have CHS (<i>p</i>=0.014). Institutions with more Pell Grant recipients were less likely to offer CHS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Access to health care is an important social determinant of health, academic persistence, and achievement for college students. HBCUs were significantly more likely than PBIs to offer CHS. HBCUs are more likely than PBIs to have resources from federal funding, donors, and endowments that may support the development of student health centers and services. Increased funding for PBI health centers could improve access and promote health equity among the most vulnerable student populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"8 1","pages":"226-234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10979689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Student health services are associated with improved health outcomes and academic success, particularly among under-resourced college populations. This study compared student health services at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Predominantly Black Institutions (PBIs) and identified factors associated with the availability of comprehensive health services (CHS).

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of 2022 data from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), the Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs) Directory, and the websites of HBCUs and PBIs (n=167). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were undertaken to identify institutional variables associated with providing CHS. Institutional variables included college type (public vs. private), MSI category (HBCU vs. PBI), undergraduate enrollment, location, and proportion of Pell grant recipients.

Results: Approximately 13% of HBCUs and 26% of PBIs offered no student health services; 65% of HBCUs and 39% of PBIs offered on-campus CHS with prescribing providers. Four-year HBCUs were five times more likely than 4-year PBIs to have CHS (p=0.014). Institutions with more Pell Grant recipients were less likely to offer CHS.

Conclusions: Access to health care is an important social determinant of health, academic persistence, and achievement for college students. HBCUs were significantly more likely than PBIs to offer CHS. HBCUs are more likely than PBIs to have resources from federal funding, donors, and endowments that may support the development of student health centers and services. Increased funding for PBI health centers could improve access and promote health equity among the most vulnerable student populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国历史悠久的黑人大学和以黑人为主的院校的学生健康服务。
导言:学生健康服务与健康状况的改善和学业成功息息相关,尤其是在资源不足的大学生群体中。本研究比较了历史悠久的黑人大学(HBCUs)和以黑人为主的院校(PBIs)的学生健康服务,并确定了与综合健康服务(CHS)可用性相关的因素:我们对中学后教育综合数据系统(IPEDS)、少数族裔服务机构(MSIs)目录以及哈佛商学院(HBCUs)和主要黑人学院(PBIs)网站(n=167)中的2022个数据进行了二次分析。我们进行了二元和多元逻辑回归分析,以确定与提供 CHS 相关的院校变量。机构变量包括学院类型(公立与私立)、MSI类别(高培大学与私立商学院)、本科生入学率、地理位置和佩尔补助金领取者的比例:约 13% 的高职高专大学和 26% 的私立大学不提供学生保健服务;65% 的高职高专大学和 39% 的私立大学提供校内有处方提供者的学生保健服务。四年制的高职高专大学比四年制的公立商学院有五倍的可能性提供学生健康服务(P=0.014)。获得佩尔助学金人数较多的院校提供 CHS 的可能性较低:结论:获得医疗保健是大学生健康、学业坚持和成绩的重要社会决定因素。哈佛商学院提供 CHS 的可能性明显高于私立商学院。高职高专院校比私立商学院更有可能从联邦基金、捐赠者和捐赠基金中获得资源,从而支持学生健康中心和服务的发展。增加对 PBI 健康中心的资助可以改善最弱势学生群体的就医情况,促进健康公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Getting Ours? "Girlbossing" and the Ethics of Nurse Reimbursement Models. "She's a Family Member": How Community Health Workers Impact Perinatal Mothers' Stress Through Social-Emotional Support and Connections to Programs and Resources. Diversifying Doulas Initiative: Improving Maternal Health Outcomes in People of Color Through Doula Care. Improving Weight Bias Awareness Among Providers in the Sexual and Reproductive Health care Setting. Racial (In)Equity in South Los Angeles-Community Centered Experiences with COVID-19 Syndemics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1