Revising the Pragmatics Profile of Everyday Communication Skills for traumatic brain injury: An international Delphi study

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1111/1460-6984.13030
Lily Tomlin, Andy Smidt, Elise Bogart
{"title":"Revising the Pragmatics Profile of Everyday Communication Skills for traumatic brain injury: An international Delphi study","authors":"Lily Tomlin,&nbsp;Andy Smidt,&nbsp;Elise Bogart","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.13030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Assessment tools that assess pragmatic skills in adults with a mild-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are hard to access, not person-centred and have a high risk of clinician bias. The Pragmatics Profile is an informant report tool that was originally designed to assess pragmatic skills in people with a developmental disability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to seek consensus from a panel of experts and create a version of the Pragmatics Profile for the TBI population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Procedures</h3>\n \n <p>A three-round modified Delphi methodology panel of 13 experts were invited to comment anonymously on the suitability of each question from the Pragmatics Profile modified for those with TBI until ≥ 80% agreement was reached.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Outcomes and Results</h3>\n \n <p>The Pragmatics Profile (TBI) included 66 questions that achieved consensus after three rounds of the Delphi panel. Qualitative analysis illuminated themes relating to adults with TBI and the need to include contextual factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions and Implications</h3>\n \n <p>The outcome of this project was a revised version of the Pragmatics Profile which is suitable for adults with a mild-severe TBI, informed by experts and freely available online. Future research exploring the tool's utility and acceptability is the next step in its evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What is already known on this subject</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Assessment of the everyday functional use of language is challenging but vital. This is particularly true for those who have traumatic brain injury (TBI) where the communication outcomes can be highly variable and may include difficulties with conversational turn-taking, topic maintenance and reading social cues.</li>\n \n <li>There are limited tools available to clinicians and those tend to be rating scales or checklists which have a high risk of clinician bias.</li>\n \n <li>Available tools have a limited ability to capture the individual's personal social communication goals.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What this paper adds to existing knowledge</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>This study created an online Pragmatics Profile (PP) for TBI based on experts’ opinions.</li>\n \n <li>This paper details the themes that emerged during the process of revising the PP for those with TBI.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The PP-TBI adds to the toolkit for speech and language therapists working with people with TBI. It meets recent recommendations in the literature to create an interview-based tool.</li>\n \n <li>The versatility of an online tool combined with revised input from a panel of experts increases the likelihood that clinicians will utilise this tool.</li>\n \n <li>Given the long-term use of the original PP by clinicians for almost 30 years and a focus on personalised care, the format and approach are also likely to be acceptable to clinicians.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.13030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.13030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Assessment tools that assess pragmatic skills in adults with a mild-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are hard to access, not person-centred and have a high risk of clinician bias. The Pragmatics Profile is an informant report tool that was originally designed to assess pragmatic skills in people with a developmental disability.

Aims

The aim of this study was to seek consensus from a panel of experts and create a version of the Pragmatics Profile for the TBI population.

Methods and Procedures

A three-round modified Delphi methodology panel of 13 experts were invited to comment anonymously on the suitability of each question from the Pragmatics Profile modified for those with TBI until ≥ 80% agreement was reached.

Outcomes and Results

The Pragmatics Profile (TBI) included 66 questions that achieved consensus after three rounds of the Delphi panel. Qualitative analysis illuminated themes relating to adults with TBI and the need to include contextual factors.

Conclusions and Implications

The outcome of this project was a revised version of the Pragmatics Profile which is suitable for adults with a mild-severe TBI, informed by experts and freely available online. Future research exploring the tool's utility and acceptability is the next step in its evaluation.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on this subject

  • Assessment of the everyday functional use of language is challenging but vital. This is particularly true for those who have traumatic brain injury (TBI) where the communication outcomes can be highly variable and may include difficulties with conversational turn-taking, topic maintenance and reading social cues.
  • There are limited tools available to clinicians and those tend to be rating scales or checklists which have a high risk of clinician bias.
  • Available tools have a limited ability to capture the individual's personal social communication goals.

What this paper adds to existing knowledge

  • This study created an online Pragmatics Profile (PP) for TBI based on experts’ opinions.
  • This paper details the themes that emerged during the process of revising the PP for those with TBI.

What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?

  • The PP-TBI adds to the toolkit for speech and language therapists working with people with TBI. It meets recent recommendations in the literature to create an interview-based tool.
  • The versatility of an online tool combined with revised input from a panel of experts increases the likelihood that clinicians will utilise this tool.
  • Given the long-term use of the original PP by clinicians for almost 30 years and a focus on personalised care, the format and approach are also likely to be acceptable to clinicians.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修订脑外伤日常交流技能语用学概况:国际德尔菲研究。
背景:用于评估轻度-重度脑损伤(TBI)成人实用技能的评估工具很难获得,不能以人为本,而且很有可能造成临床医生的偏见。语用学档案是一种信息报告工具,最初设计用于评估发育障碍者的语用能力。研究目的:本研究旨在寻求专家小组的共识,并为 TBI 群体创建一个语用学档案版本:由 13 位专家组成的三轮改良德尔菲法专家小组受邀就针对创伤性脑损伤患者修改的语用学概况中的每个问题是否合适发表匿名评论,直至达成≥ 80% 的一致意见:语用学概况(创伤性脑损伤)包括 66 个问题,经过德尔菲小组三轮讨论后达成了共识。定性分析揭示了与患有创伤性脑损伤的成年人有关的主题,以及纳入背景因素的必要性:该项目的成果是修订了语用学档案,该档案适用于轻度-重度创伤性脑损伤的成年人,由专家提供信息,并可在网上免费获取。下一步将对该工具的实用性和可接受性进行评估研究:关于此主题的已知信息 对日常语言功能使用的评估具有挑战性,但却至关重要。对于脑外伤(TBI)患者来说尤其如此,因为他们的交流结果可能会有很大的差异,其中可能包括会话转换、话题维持和阅读社交暗示方面的困难。可供临床医生使用的工具非常有限,而且这些工具往往是评级量表或核对表,临床医生使用时很容易出现偏差。现有工具捕捉个人社交沟通目标的能力有限。本文对现有知识的补充 本研究根据专家的意见为创伤性脑损伤患者创建了在线语用学档案(PP)。本文详细介绍了在为创伤性脑损伤患者修订 PP 的过程中出现的主题。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?PP-TBI 为从事 TBI 患者工作的言语和语言治疗师增添了工具包。它符合最近文献中关于创建基于访谈的工具的建议。在线工具的多功能性与专家小组的修订意见相结合,增加了临床医生使用该工具的可能性。鉴于临床医生长期使用原版 PP 近 30 年,并注重个性化护理,因此其格式和方法也很可能为临床医生所接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
期刊最新文献
Exploring vowel errors produced in nonword repetition in children with speech and language disorders. Animal-assisted services for adults with acquired neurogenic communication disorders: A scoping review. Gender and age biases in the assessment of speech accuracy: A study of speech-language clinicians' ratings of /s/ accuracy. Cultural adaptation and psychometric analysis of Communication Activities of Daily Living third edition in Spanish and Catalan for people with aphasia. Lexical retrieval difficulties in post-COVID-19 syndrome: Insights from verbal fluency and naming tasks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1