Perinatal Mental Health: The Need For Broader Understanding And Policies That Meet The Challenges.

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Affairs Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01455
Emily C Dossett, Alison Stuebe, Twylla Dillion, Karen M Tabb
{"title":"Perinatal Mental Health: The Need For Broader Understanding And Policies That Meet The Challenges.","authors":"Emily C Dossett, Alison Stuebe, Twylla Dillion, Karen M Tabb","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perinatal mental health is gaining recognition as a key antecedent of adverse maternal and child outcomes as the United States experiences a maternal mortality and morbidity crisis. Recent policy efforts have attempted to mitigate adverse outcomes through legislation such as the Taskforce Recommending Improvements for Unaddressed Mental Perinatal and Postpartum Health (TRIUMPH) for New Moms Act of 2021 and postpartum coverage through Medicaid expansion. Even with progress, perinatal mental health policy continues to grapple with a basic truth: The United States lacks an overarching health care system capable of meeting the mental health care needs of perinatal people and their families.  Moreover, the burden of undiagnosed and untreated perinatal mental health challenges remains greatest among racially minoritized populations, such as Black, Asian, and multiracial people. A broader understanding of perinatal mental health is needed, grounded in the tenets of reproductive justice. From this perspective, we articulate specific policies to meet perinatal mental health challenges and promote thriving for birthing people and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":50411,"journal":{"name":"Health Affairs","volume":"43 4","pages":"462-469"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01455","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perinatal mental health is gaining recognition as a key antecedent of adverse maternal and child outcomes as the United States experiences a maternal mortality and morbidity crisis. Recent policy efforts have attempted to mitigate adverse outcomes through legislation such as the Taskforce Recommending Improvements for Unaddressed Mental Perinatal and Postpartum Health (TRIUMPH) for New Moms Act of 2021 and postpartum coverage through Medicaid expansion. Even with progress, perinatal mental health policy continues to grapple with a basic truth: The United States lacks an overarching health care system capable of meeting the mental health care needs of perinatal people and their families.  Moreover, the burden of undiagnosed and untreated perinatal mental health challenges remains greatest among racially minoritized populations, such as Black, Asian, and multiracial people. A broader understanding of perinatal mental health is needed, grounded in the tenets of reproductive justice. From this perspective, we articulate specific policies to meet perinatal mental health challenges and promote thriving for birthing people and their families.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期心理健康:需要更广泛的理解和应对挑战的政策。
随着美国经历孕产妇死亡率和发病率危机,围产期心理健康逐渐被视为孕产妇和儿童不良结局的关键先决条件。最近的政策努力试图通过立法来减轻不利的结果,如《2021 年新妈妈围产期和产后心理健康未得到解决的改进建议特别工作组法案》(TRIUMPH),以及通过扩大医疗补助计划的产后覆盖范围。即使取得了进展,围产期心理健康政策仍要面对一个基本事实:美国缺乏一个能够满足围产期人群及其家庭心理健康需求的总体医疗保健系统。此外,在黑人、亚裔和多种族等少数种族人群中,围产期心理健康问题未得到诊断和治疗的负担仍然最为沉重。我们需要从生殖正义的原则出发,对围产期心理健康有一个更广泛的认识。从这一角度出发,我们阐述了应对围产期心理健康挑战的具体政策,促进分娩者及其家庭的茁壮成长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Affairs
Health Affairs 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.10%
发文量
246
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Affairs is a prestigious journal that aims to thoroughly examine significant health policy matters both domestically and globally. Our publication is committed to addressing issues that are relevant to both the private and public sectors. We are enthusiastic about inviting private and public decision-makers to contribute their innovative ideas in a publishable format. Health Affairs seeks to incorporate various perspectives from industry, labor, government, and academia, ensuring that our readers benefit from the diverse viewpoints within the healthcare field.
期刊最新文献
Judicial Decisions Constraining Public Health Powers During COVID-19: Implications For Public Health Policy Making. Engaging Antiracist And Decolonial Praxis To Advance Equity In Oregon Public Health Surveillance Practices. Colocating Syringe Services, COVID-19 Vaccination, And Infectious Disease Testing: Baltimore's Experience. Coming Up Short: How Cancer Drug Shortages Affect Care. Community Health Workers Can Bridge The Gap.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1