‘They don't think I can do it’: Experiences of self-advocates, employment specialists, and employers on employment of adults with intellectual disability

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1111/jar.13231
Rae Morris, Jennifer Christianson-Barker, Tim Stainton, Rachel Mills, Chris Rowley, John Cox, Monica Schroeder, Rachelle Hole
{"title":"‘They don't think I can do it’: Experiences of self-advocates, employment specialists, and employers on employment of adults with intellectual disability","authors":"Rae Morris,&nbsp;Jennifer Christianson-Barker,&nbsp;Tim Stainton,&nbsp;Rachel Mills,&nbsp;Chris Rowley,&nbsp;John Cox,&nbsp;Monica Schroeder,&nbsp;Rachelle Hole","doi":"10.1111/jar.13231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A multi-phase Canadian study was conducted as part of a large-scale community and academic research partnership focused on understanding and improving the employment experiences of people with intellectual disabilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This multi-method study utilized a sequential approach, using findings from qualitative interviews (<i>n</i> = 28) to inform an online survey (<i>n</i> = 149). Participants were invited to share their experiences with paid employment or with persons with intellectual disabilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thematic analysis of data across interview and survey findings resulted in six themes: (1) assumptions and attitudes, (2) knowledge and awareness, (3) accessibility of processes, (4) use of accommodations, (5) workplace relationships, and (6) supports and resources.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A holistic and systemic approach has the potential to improve inclusive employment experiences of people with intellectual disabilities. Action is needed mainly at the policy and employer level to reduce barriers and improve on facilitating measures reinforced by the themes shared in this study.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.13231","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.13231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A multi-phase Canadian study was conducted as part of a large-scale community and academic research partnership focused on understanding and improving the employment experiences of people with intellectual disabilities.

Method

This multi-method study utilized a sequential approach, using findings from qualitative interviews (n = 28) to inform an online survey (n = 149). Participants were invited to share their experiences with paid employment or with persons with intellectual disabilities.

Results

Thematic analysis of data across interview and survey findings resulted in six themes: (1) assumptions and attitudes, (2) knowledge and awareness, (3) accessibility of processes, (4) use of accommodations, (5) workplace relationships, and (6) supports and resources.

Conclusions

A holistic and systemic approach has the potential to improve inclusive employment experiences of people with intellectual disabilities. Action is needed mainly at the policy and employer level to reduce barriers and improve on facilitating measures reinforced by the themes shared in this study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
他们认为我做不到":自我倡导者、就业专家和雇主在智障成人就业方面的经验。
研究背景加拿大开展了一项多阶段研究,作为大规模社区和学术研究合作项目的一部分,该项目侧重于了解和改善智障人士的就业经历:这项多方法研究采用了循序渐进的方法,利用定性访谈(n = 28)的结果为在线调查(n = 149)提供信息。参与者受邀分享他们在有偿就业或与智障人士相处方面的经验:对访谈和调查结果中的数据进行专题分析后,得出了六个主题:(1)假设和态度;(2)知识和意识;(3)流程的无障碍性;(4)便利措施的使用;(5)工作场所关系;以及(6)支持和资源:整体和系统的方法有可能改善智障人士的包容性就业体验。主要需要在政策和雇主层面采取行动,以减少障碍并改进促进措施,本研究中分享的主题强化了这些措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.
期刊最新文献
Programme Recipient and Facilitator Experiences of Positive Family Connections for Families of Children With Intellectual Disabilities and/or Who Are Autistic External Factors Influencing the Motivation and Performance of Staff in Their Nutritional Work With Adults With Intellectual Disabilities Adapting a Self-Concept Questionnaire for Students With Intellectual Disabilities: An Inclusive Research Approach Teaching Early Reading Skills to Adults With Intellectual Disabilities Using a Support Worker/Family Carer Mediated Online Reading Programme: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial Language and Ageing in Adults With Down Syndrome: An Analysis of Receptive and Expressive Language Measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1