Environmental impact evaluation of low-carbon concrete incorporating fly ash and limestone

J. Thorne , D.V. Bompa , M.F. Funari , N. Garcia-Troncoso
{"title":"Environmental impact evaluation of low-carbon concrete incorporating fly ash and limestone","authors":"J. Thorne ,&nbsp;D.V. Bompa ,&nbsp;M.F. Funari ,&nbsp;N. Garcia-Troncoso","doi":"10.1016/j.clema.2024.100242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This work examines the environmental impact of low-carbon concrete that incorporates supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). After reviewing near-zero carbon SCMs and low-carbon concrete, a life cycle assessment (LCA) was undertaken for concrete mix designs with normal-to-high compressive strengths, incorporating limestone and fly ash as cement replacements. The analysis includes relevant region-specific life cycle inventory parameters for raw materials, energy production, and transportation. A comparative assessment between embodied carbon emissions and the material mechanical performance is then made. The results of this paper indicate that incorporating limestone and fly ash in concrete can reduce carbon emissions, yet at a proportional decrease in mechanical properties compared to conventional cement concrete. The combination of cement and fly ash produced, on average, a higher strength concrete by 20.5% and lower CO<sub>2</sub>-eq values by 21.1% when compared to limestone cement blends. The CO<sub>2</sub>-eq emissions associated with transportation of the main constituents for concrete production were on average below 4% of the total CO<sub>2</sub>-eq per mix. In addition to eco-mechanical quantitative assessments, the study offers insights and recommendations for the development of concrete materials considering global resource availability of near-zero carbon concrete constituents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100254,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Materials","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772397624000261/pdfft?md5=d5a254dfb12f4ca621bf6593bcab02e6&pid=1-s2.0-S2772397624000261-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772397624000261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work examines the environmental impact of low-carbon concrete that incorporates supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). After reviewing near-zero carbon SCMs and low-carbon concrete, a life cycle assessment (LCA) was undertaken for concrete mix designs with normal-to-high compressive strengths, incorporating limestone and fly ash as cement replacements. The analysis includes relevant region-specific life cycle inventory parameters for raw materials, energy production, and transportation. A comparative assessment between embodied carbon emissions and the material mechanical performance is then made. The results of this paper indicate that incorporating limestone and fly ash in concrete can reduce carbon emissions, yet at a proportional decrease in mechanical properties compared to conventional cement concrete. The combination of cement and fly ash produced, on average, a higher strength concrete by 20.5% and lower CO2-eq values by 21.1% when compared to limestone cement blends. The CO2-eq emissions associated with transportation of the main constituents for concrete production were on average below 4% of the total CO2-eq per mix. In addition to eco-mechanical quantitative assessments, the study offers insights and recommendations for the development of concrete materials considering global resource availability of near-zero carbon concrete constituents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
掺入粉煤灰和石灰石的低碳混凝土的环境影响评估
本研究探讨了掺入辅助胶凝材料 (SCM) 的低碳混凝土对环境的影响。在对近零碳 SCM 和低碳混凝土进行审查后,对采用石灰石和粉煤灰作为水泥替代品的普通至高抗压强度混凝土混合设计进行了生命周期评估(LCA)。分析包括针对特定地区的原材料、能源生产和运输的生命周期清单参数。然后对体现的碳排放量和材料的机械性能进行了比较评估。本文的研究结果表明,在混凝土中加入石灰石和粉煤灰可以减少碳排放,但与传统水泥混凝土相比,机械性能会相应降低。与石灰石水泥混合物相比,水泥和粉煤灰的组合产生的混凝土强度平均提高了 20.5%,二氧化碳当量值降低了 21.1%。与混凝土生产主要成分运输相关的二氧化碳当量排放量平均低于每种混合物二氧化碳当量总量的 4%。除了生态力学定量评估外,该研究还考虑到全球近零碳混凝土成分的资源可用性,为混凝土材料的开发提供了见解和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of the influence of crushed sand on carbonation of Mortar: Physical and microstructural analysis Biodegradable natural polymers and fibers for 3D printing: A holistic perspective on processing, characterization, and advanced applications Experimental study of phase change material (PCM) biochar composite for net-zero built environment applications Research trends on thermochromic asphalt mixtures functionalization: Bibliometric analysis and review Synergistic impact of geopolymer binder and recycled coarse aggregates on the performance of concrete masonry units
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1