Why are people leaving public transport? A panel study of changes in transit-use patterns between 2019, 2021, and 2022 in Montréal, Canada

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpubtr.2024.100087
Rodrigo Victoriano-Habit , Ahmed El-Geneidy
{"title":"Why are people leaving public transport? A panel study of changes in transit-use patterns between 2019, 2021, and 2022 in Montréal, Canada","authors":"Rodrigo Victoriano-Habit ,&nbsp;Ahmed El-Geneidy","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2024.100087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The outbreak of COVID-19 caused unprecedented declines in public-transport use. As travel frequencies rebound, ridership is recovering, although it remains considerably below pre-pandemic levels. This study compares pre- to post-pandemic public-transit use among workers and non-workers, and the changing impact of local and regional accessibility. Additionally, we assess the impact of increased telecommuting on workers’ transit use before, during, and after the pandemic. We estimate two weighted multilevel linear regressions using a three-wave panel survey over the years 2019–2022 in Montréal, Canada. Results indicate that the factors that determine workers’ and non-workers’ transit patterns have tended to diverge after the pandemic. For workers, the relevance of accessibility in promoting utilitarian transit use considerably decreased, being responsible for close to 10% of the post-pandemic transit-use reduction. The increase of telecommuting frequency due to the pandemic contributed more than 10% of the post-pandemic transit-use reduction, but the effect of transit commuting time has remained relevant. For non-workers, the effect of regional accessibility by transit has increased after the pandemic, which has partly mitigated non-workers’ transit-use decline. Moreover, we find there is a joint effect of local and regional accessibility that has maintained after 2019 for non-workers. Results from this work have relevant implications for transit planners and policymakers. To help transit-use recovery, results suggest that providing good transit connection to the workplace promotes workers’ transit use, while promoting transit accessibility in lower-local-accessibility areas is key for non-worker transit ridership.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X24000079/pdfft?md5=763b5b1c118093af0d092992f81e44b7&pid=1-s2.0-S1077291X24000079-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X24000079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 caused unprecedented declines in public-transport use. As travel frequencies rebound, ridership is recovering, although it remains considerably below pre-pandemic levels. This study compares pre- to post-pandemic public-transit use among workers and non-workers, and the changing impact of local and regional accessibility. Additionally, we assess the impact of increased telecommuting on workers’ transit use before, during, and after the pandemic. We estimate two weighted multilevel linear regressions using a three-wave panel survey over the years 2019–2022 in Montréal, Canada. Results indicate that the factors that determine workers’ and non-workers’ transit patterns have tended to diverge after the pandemic. For workers, the relevance of accessibility in promoting utilitarian transit use considerably decreased, being responsible for close to 10% of the post-pandemic transit-use reduction. The increase of telecommuting frequency due to the pandemic contributed more than 10% of the post-pandemic transit-use reduction, but the effect of transit commuting time has remained relevant. For non-workers, the effect of regional accessibility by transit has increased after the pandemic, which has partly mitigated non-workers’ transit-use decline. Moreover, we find there is a joint effect of local and regional accessibility that has maintained after 2019 for non-workers. Results from this work have relevant implications for transit planners and policymakers. To help transit-use recovery, results suggest that providing good transit connection to the workplace promotes workers’ transit use, while promoting transit accessibility in lower-local-accessibility areas is key for non-worker transit ridership.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人们为何离开公共交通?加拿大蒙特利尔 2019、2021 和 2022 年公交使用模式变化的小组研究
COVID-19 的爆发导致公共交通使用率空前下降。随着出行频率的回升,乘客数量也在恢复,但仍大大低于疫情爆发前的水平。本研究比较了疫情爆发前和疫情爆发后工人和非工人的公共交通使用情况,以及当地和区域交通便利性的影响变化。此外,我们还评估了大流行之前、期间和之后远程办公的增加对工人使用公交的影响。我们使用加拿大蒙特利尔市 2019-2022 年的三波面板调查估计了两个加权多层次线性回归。结果表明,大流行后,决定工人和非工人公交模式的因素趋于不同。对工人而言,交通便利性在促进实用性公交使用方面的相关性大大降低,占大流行后公交使用减少的近 10%。大流行病导致的远程办公频率增加占大流行病后公交使用减少量的 10%以上,但公交通勤时间的影响仍然相关。对于非上班族而言,大流行后区域交通可达性的影响有所增加,这在一定程度上缓解了非上班族公交使用率的下降。此外,我们还发现本地和区域交通便利性的共同效应在 2019 年之后对非工人的影响依然存在。这项工作的结果对公交规划者和政策制定者具有重要意义。为了帮助恢复公交使用率,结果表明,提供与工作场所良好的公交连接可促进工人的公交使用率,而在当地交通可达性较低的地区提高公交可达性则是非工人公交乘坐率的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1