Exploring the complex relationship between depression and risky decision-making: A meta-analysis

Tao Wang, Jianmin Zeng, Yujie Yuan, Ying He, Jiayi Zhu, Beitong Lin, Qiao Yin, Peiru Peng
{"title":"Exploring the complex relationship between depression and risky decision-making: A meta-analysis","authors":"Tao Wang,&nbsp;Jianmin Zeng,&nbsp;Yujie Yuan,&nbsp;Ying He,&nbsp;Jiayi Zhu,&nbsp;Beitong Lin,&nbsp;Qiao Yin,&nbsp;Peiru Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerous studies have examined the association between depression and risky decision-making, but the results are mixed. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of risky decision-making in individuals with current Major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients with MDD exhibit divergent performances in risky decision-making across various tasks. Specifically, MDD patients tend to select the disadvantageous decks in the Iowa Gambling Task (<em>SMD</em> = 0.40; 95%<em>CI</em> = 0.09 to 0.70; <em>p</em> = 0.011), make fewer pumps on the balloon in the Balloon Analog Risk Task (<em>SMD</em> = -0.29; 95%<em>CI</em> = -0.47 to -0.12; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), and demonstrate similar performance in the Cambridge Gambling Task and the Game of Dice Task when compared to healthy controls. The meta-regression analysis revealed that age exhibits a significant correlation with the effect size in the Balloon Analog Risk Task (<em>z</em> = 2.375, <em>p</em> = 0.018, 95%<em>CI</em> = [0.004,0.043]). The subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in effect sizes among age groups within both the Iowa Gambling Task (<em>Q</em> = 9.34, <em>df</em> = 3, <em>p</em> = 0.025) and the Balloon Analog Risk Task (<em>Q</em> = 6.48, <em>df</em> = 1, <em>p</em> = 0.011). These findings indicate that MDD might impair the distinct process of risky decision-making, and age may paly vital role in the performance of MDD patients in risky decision-making. Understanding this could potentially facilitate more effective clinical interventions, thus reducing the burden on society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100771"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691532400057X/pdfft?md5=c9d26e13234bca02c0c6da475ba6672d&pid=1-s2.0-S266691532400057X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691532400057X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous studies have examined the association between depression and risky decision-making, but the results are mixed. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of risky decision-making in individuals with current Major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients with MDD exhibit divergent performances in risky decision-making across various tasks. Specifically, MDD patients tend to select the disadvantageous decks in the Iowa Gambling Task (SMD = 0.40; 95%CI = 0.09 to 0.70; p = 0.011), make fewer pumps on the balloon in the Balloon Analog Risk Task (SMD = -0.29; 95%CI = -0.47 to -0.12; p < 0.01), and demonstrate similar performance in the Cambridge Gambling Task and the Game of Dice Task when compared to healthy controls. The meta-regression analysis revealed that age exhibits a significant correlation with the effect size in the Balloon Analog Risk Task (z = 2.375, p = 0.018, 95%CI = [0.004,0.043]). The subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in effect sizes among age groups within both the Iowa Gambling Task (Q = 9.34, df = 3, p = 0.025) and the Balloon Analog Risk Task (Q = 6.48, df = 1, p = 0.011). These findings indicate that MDD might impair the distinct process of risky decision-making, and age may paly vital role in the performance of MDD patients in risky decision-making. Understanding this could potentially facilitate more effective clinical interventions, thus reducing the burden on society.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索抑郁症与风险决策之间的复杂关系:荟萃分析
许多研究探讨了抑郁症与风险决策之间的关系,但结果不一。为了解决这个问题,我们对重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者的风险决策进行了荟萃分析。在不同的任务中,重度抑郁症患者在风险决策中表现出不同的表现。具体来说,与健康对照组相比,MDD 患者在爱荷华赌博任务(SMD = 0.40; 95%CI = 0.09 to 0.70; p = 0.011)中倾向于选择不利的牌面,在气球模拟风险任务(SMD = -0.29; 95%CI = -0.47 to -0.12;p<0.01)中较少在气球上抽水,而在剑桥赌博任务和骰子游戏任务中表现类似。元回归分析显示,年龄与气球模拟风险任务的效应大小有显著相关性(z = 2.375,p = 0.018,95%CI = [0.004,0.043])。亚组分析表明,在爱荷华赌博任务(Q = 9.34,df = 3,p = 0.025)和气球模拟风险任务(Q = 6.48,df = 1,p = 0.011)中,不同年龄组的效应大小存在显著差异。这些研究结果表明,多发性硬化症可能会损害风险决策的独特过程,而年龄可能对多发性硬化症患者在风险决策中的表现起着至关重要的作用。了解这一点可能有助于采取更有效的临床干预措施,从而减轻社会负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Real-world effectiveness of self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for depression: A retrospective cohort study Language influences perception of impulsive tendencies of depressed individuals Understanding the natural landscape of the chronology of major depressive disorder and mania in youth Longitudinal associations between service member problematic anger and marital dysfunction in U.S. military couples: Findings from the Millennium Cohort Program State-dependent alterations in circulating mitochondrial DNA copy number and common deletion in bipolar disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1