A consensus-based tool for capability benchmarking of emergency medical services in South Africa

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE African Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1016/j.afjem.2024.03.003
Ashleigh Vincent-Lambert, Christopher Stein
{"title":"A consensus-based tool for capability benchmarking of emergency medical services in South Africa","authors":"Ashleigh Vincent-Lambert,&nbsp;Christopher Stein","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2024.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Standards for Emergency Medical Services [EMS] have recently been introduced in South Africa in a movement towards the promotion of quality improvement. While these standards identify a minimum set of criteria for EMS quality they do not differentiate between services just meeting them and those exceeding them. Benchmarking may be a helpful exercise in beginning to address the question of comparative levels of capability in EMS beyond a set of minimum standards. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based capability benchmarking tool for EMS organizations within the South African context.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 12 experts in the field of EMS in South Africa consented to participate in two Delphi Surveys in order to achieve consensus on the core components of an EMS organization as well as relevant level descriptors for those components. The resulting data was used to develop a consensus-based capability benchmarking tool for EMS organizations in South Africa.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A consensus-based capability benchmarking tool was developed that allows organizations to distinguish whether the organization's capability, as a whole, is underdeveloped, developing, or well-developed. This is in addition to identifying how capable they are in all individual components or sub-components.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It is recommended that further research be conducted to assess this tool's implementation within different EMS organizations in South Africa, and that this study is used as a stepping-stone for additional research into meaningful quality improvement in emergency medical services in South Africa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48515,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"14 2","pages":"Pages 75-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X24000077/pdfft?md5=67239731ae6b961417a6a0e3389f8092&pid=1-s2.0-S2211419X24000077-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X24000077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Standards for Emergency Medical Services [EMS] have recently been introduced in South Africa in a movement towards the promotion of quality improvement. While these standards identify a minimum set of criteria for EMS quality they do not differentiate between services just meeting them and those exceeding them. Benchmarking may be a helpful exercise in beginning to address the question of comparative levels of capability in EMS beyond a set of minimum standards. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based capability benchmarking tool for EMS organizations within the South African context.

Methods

A total of 12 experts in the field of EMS in South Africa consented to participate in two Delphi Surveys in order to achieve consensus on the core components of an EMS organization as well as relevant level descriptors for those components. The resulting data was used to develop a consensus-based capability benchmarking tool for EMS organizations in South Africa.

Results

A consensus-based capability benchmarking tool was developed that allows organizations to distinguish whether the organization's capability, as a whole, is underdeveloped, developing, or well-developed. This is in addition to identifying how capable they are in all individual components or sub-components.

Conclusion

It is recommended that further research be conducted to assess this tool's implementation within different EMS organizations in South Africa, and that this study is used as a stepping-stone for additional research into meaningful quality improvement in emergency medical services in South Africa.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于共识的南非紧急医疗服务能力基准工具
导言 南非最近推出了紧急医疗服务(EMS)标准,以促进质量改进。虽然这些标准为急救医疗服务的质量确定了一套最低标准,但并没有区分哪些服务刚刚达到这些标准,哪些服务超过了这些标准。制定基准可能有助于着手解决急救服务能力比较水平的问题,而不是一套最低标准。本研究的目的是为南非的急救医疗组织开发一个基于共识的能力基准工具。方法 南非急救医疗领域共有 12 位专家同意参加两次德尔菲调查,以便就急救医疗组织的核心组成部分以及这些组成部分的相关水平描述达成共识。结果开发出一种基于共识的能力基准工具,使各组织能够区分组织的整体能力是欠发达、发展中还是发达。结论建议开展进一步研究,以评估该工具在南非不同急救医疗组织中的实施情况,并将本研究作为进一步研究南非急救医疗服务质量改进的垫脚石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
85 days
期刊最新文献
Barriers to accessing appendectomy in the public sector health system in the Western Cape Province, South Africa Abstracts from African Conference of Emergency Care 2024. Gaborone, Botswana November 2024 Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the utilization of emergency medical services in Nairobi, Kenya The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on presentations with suicidal behaviour in a tertiary hospital Emergency Centre in the Eastern Cape, South Africa–A cross-sectional analysis From vocational to graduation: A mixed methods study of support needs for vocational learners pursuing post-graduate education in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1