Landslide susceptibility evaluation in the Beas River Basin of North-Western Himalaya: A geospatial analysis employing the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method

IF 2.9 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Quaternary Science Advances Pub Date : 2024-03-24 DOI:10.1016/j.qsa.2024.100180
Madhulika Singh , Varun Khajuria , Sachchidanand Singh , Kamal Singh
{"title":"Landslide susceptibility evaluation in the Beas River Basin of North-Western Himalaya: A geospatial analysis employing the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method","authors":"Madhulika Singh ,&nbsp;Varun Khajuria ,&nbsp;Sachchidanand Singh ,&nbsp;Kamal Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.qsa.2024.100180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the North-Western Himalayas, particularly within the Beas Basin of Himachal Pradesh, landslide incidents are frequent, primarily due to the unique interplay of adverse geological conditions, heavy rainfall, and human factors. These incidents result in substantial loss of life and property each year. To mitigate such issues, systematic landslide research is essential, encompassing aspects like inventory mapping and risk assessment. This study leverages the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for an in-depth Landslide Susceptibility Index (LSI) mapping in the Beas River basin, employing remote sensing data to analyze key factors contributing to the region's instability. The process involved a detailed selection and mapping of landslide conditioning variables, guided by validated landslide inventory data and high-resolution remote sensing images, ensuring an accurate representation of the basin's geographical variations. The creation of the landslide susceptibility map utilized the weighted overlay approach, categorizing the area into five levels of susceptibility: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. This classification incorporated ten critical factors influencing landslide occurrence, including elevation, slope aspect, slope angle, distance from drainage, lithology, distance from lineament, geomorphology, rainfall, and land use/land cover (LULC). The LSI was calculated through the Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) technique, leveraging the weights and ratings derived via the AHP method. This analysis revealed that approximately 634.1 square kilometers, or 12.8% of the region, face very high landslide susceptibility, followed by 22.6% at high, 25.8% with moderate, 24.4% at low, and 14.5% at very low susceptibility. The LSI map's accuracy in predicting landslides was affirmed through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and Area Under Curve (AUC) evaluations, showcasing an 86.3% precision rate. This classification facilitates focused interventions in high-risk areas, guiding planners in landslide-conscious development and infrastructure planning. It directs engineers toward engineering solutions like slope stabilization and drainage improvements to mitigate landslide effects. Moreover, this approach supports the creation of evacuation and emergency response plans, bolstering community resilience to landslide threats in the river basin.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34142,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Science Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666033424000182/pdfft?md5=5181dbdd7d23110e0dd7a37ba6814c76&pid=1-s2.0-S2666033424000182-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Science Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666033424000182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the North-Western Himalayas, particularly within the Beas Basin of Himachal Pradesh, landslide incidents are frequent, primarily due to the unique interplay of adverse geological conditions, heavy rainfall, and human factors. These incidents result in substantial loss of life and property each year. To mitigate such issues, systematic landslide research is essential, encompassing aspects like inventory mapping and risk assessment. This study leverages the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for an in-depth Landslide Susceptibility Index (LSI) mapping in the Beas River basin, employing remote sensing data to analyze key factors contributing to the region's instability. The process involved a detailed selection and mapping of landslide conditioning variables, guided by validated landslide inventory data and high-resolution remote sensing images, ensuring an accurate representation of the basin's geographical variations. The creation of the landslide susceptibility map utilized the weighted overlay approach, categorizing the area into five levels of susceptibility: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. This classification incorporated ten critical factors influencing landslide occurrence, including elevation, slope aspect, slope angle, distance from drainage, lithology, distance from lineament, geomorphology, rainfall, and land use/land cover (LULC). The LSI was calculated through the Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) technique, leveraging the weights and ratings derived via the AHP method. This analysis revealed that approximately 634.1 square kilometers, or 12.8% of the region, face very high landslide susceptibility, followed by 22.6% at high, 25.8% with moderate, 24.4% at low, and 14.5% at very low susceptibility. The LSI map's accuracy in predicting landslides was affirmed through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and Area Under Curve (AUC) evaluations, showcasing an 86.3% precision rate. This classification facilitates focused interventions in high-risk areas, guiding planners in landslide-conscious development and infrastructure planning. It directs engineers toward engineering solutions like slope stabilization and drainage improvements to mitigate landslide effects. Moreover, this approach supports the creation of evacuation and emergency response plans, bolstering community resilience to landslide threats in the river basin.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喜马拉雅山西北部比斯河流域的滑坡易发性评估:采用层次分析法(AHP)进行地理空间分析
在喜马拉雅山西北部,尤其是喜马偕尔邦的比斯河盆地,山体滑坡事件频发,这主要是由于恶劣的地质条件、暴雨和人为因素的独特作用造成的。这些事件每年都会造成重大的生命和财产损失。为了缓解这些问题,必须开展系统的滑坡研究,其中包括清查制图和风险评估等方面。本研究利用层次分析法(AHP)对比斯河流域进行了深入的滑坡易感指数(LSI)绘图,并利用遥感数据分析了造成该地区不稳定的关键因素。在这一过程中,以经过验证的滑坡清单数据和高分辨率遥感图像为指导,对滑坡条件变量进行了详细的选择和绘图,确保准确反映流域的地理变化。滑坡易发性地图的绘制采用了加权叠加法,将该地区的易发性分为五个等级:极低、低、中、高和极高。该分类包含影响滑坡发生的十个关键因素,包括海拔、坡面、坡角、与排水系统的距离、岩性、与线状体的距离、地貌、降雨量和土地利用/土地覆盖(LULC)。LSI 是通过加权线性组合 (WLC) 技术,利用 AHP 方法得出的权重和评级计算得出的。分析结果显示,约 634.1 平方公里(占该地区面积的 12.8%)的土地极易发生滑坡,其次是 22.6%的土地易发生滑坡,25.8%的土地易发生滑坡,24.4%的土地易发生滑坡,14.5%的土地易发生滑坡。通过接收器工作特征(ROC)和曲线下面积(AUC)评估,证实了 LSI 地图预测滑坡的准确性,精确率高达 86.3%。这种分类有助于对高风险地区进行重点干预,指导规划人员进行具有滑坡意识的开发和基础设施规划。它指导工程师采用工程解决方案,如边坡加固和排水系统改进,以减轻滑坡影响。此外,这种方法还有助于制定疏散和应急计划,增强社区应对流域滑坡威胁的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quaternary Science Advances
Quaternary Science Advances Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Tracing drainage capture between the two large tributaries of the Yangtze River in the southeastern Tibetan plateau: Insights from detrital apatite fission-track thermochronology GIS and remote sensing-based wildlife habitat suitability analysis for Mountain Nyala (Tragelaphus buxtoni) at Bale Mountains National Park, Ethiopia Combined GIS, FR and AHP approaches to landslide susceptibility and risk zonation in the Baso Liben district, Northwestern Ethiopia Cultural rhythms and pulses on MIS 5-3 migration episodes of Homo sapiens dispersal in Northeast Africa Middle Stone Age technological organisation from MIS 5 at Mertenhof Rockshelter, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1