Programs of study and earnings dynamics

IF 2.2 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Labour Economics Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102532
Philippe d’Astous , Stephen H. Shore
{"title":"Programs of study and earnings dynamics","authors":"Philippe d’Astous ,&nbsp;Stephen H. Shore","doi":"10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>University programs differ in the subsequent earnings processes of their enrollees, including many features that students might care about to differing degrees such as the level of average earnings, earnings growth, and volatility. Do the earnings features of a university program’s enrollees reflect the causal effect of enrolling in that program or the self-selection of students into that program? Would students experience a different earnings process if they enrolled in a different program of study? To estimate the causal impact of enrolling in a program of study on the enrollees’ future earnings process, we exploit a discontinuity built into the Danish national university admissions system, which provides quasi-random assignment of similar applicants to different programs. We leverage the rich cross-program variation in the enrollees’ future earnings processes to measure the impact of entering a program whose enrollees experience high earnings levels, growth, and volatility on their own subsequent earnings level, growth, and volatility. We find that a student’s subsequent earnings levels and volatility – but not their earnings growth – are caused by entering programs of study whose enrollees have those features.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48153,"journal":{"name":"Labour Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537124000228/pdfft?md5=d291487f5e44256dab071ddd9006d1ff&pid=1-s2.0-S0927537124000228-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537124000228","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

University programs differ in the subsequent earnings processes of their enrollees, including many features that students might care about to differing degrees such as the level of average earnings, earnings growth, and volatility. Do the earnings features of a university program’s enrollees reflect the causal effect of enrolling in that program or the self-selection of students into that program? Would students experience a different earnings process if they enrolled in a different program of study? To estimate the causal impact of enrolling in a program of study on the enrollees’ future earnings process, we exploit a discontinuity built into the Danish national university admissions system, which provides quasi-random assignment of similar applicants to different programs. We leverage the rich cross-program variation in the enrollees’ future earnings processes to measure the impact of entering a program whose enrollees experience high earnings levels, growth, and volatility on their own subsequent earnings level, growth, and volatility. We find that a student’s subsequent earnings levels and volatility – but not their earnings growth – are caused by entering programs of study whose enrollees have those features.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习计划和收入动态
大学课程在其注册学生的后续收入过程中存在差异,包括学生可能在不同程度上关心的许多特征,如平均收入水平、收入增长和波动性。大学课程学生的收入特征是反映了学生报读该课程的因果效应,还是反映了学生对该课程的自我选择?如果学生就读不同的专业,他们会经历不同的收入过程吗?为了估算就读某一专业对学生未来收入过程的因果影响,我们利用了丹麦国家大学招生系统中的不连续性,该系统将类似的申请者准随机分配到不同的专业。我们利用入学学生未来收入过程中丰富的跨专业差异,来衡量进入一个入学学生经历过高收入水平、高增长和高波动性的专业对其自身后续收入水平、增长和波动性的影响。我们发现,学生的后续收入水平和波动性--但不是他们的收入增长--是由进入那些注册学生具有这些特征的学习项目所引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Labour Economics
Labour Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: Labour Economics is devoted to publishing research in the field of labour economics both on the microeconomic and on the macroeconomic level, in a balanced mix of theory, empirical testing and policy applications. It gives due recognition to analysis and explanation of institutional arrangements of national labour markets and the impact of these institutions on labour market outcomes.
期刊最新文献
The labor market effects of facilitating social security contributions under part-time employment contracts: Evidence from Colombia Decomposing the exporter wage gap: Selection or differential returns? Heterogeneous effects of monetary and non-monetary job characteristics on job attractiveness in nursing Labour market impacts of the China shock: Why the tide of Globalisation did not lift all boats The value of commuting time, flexibility, and job security: Evidence from current and recent jobseekers in Flanders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1