A stepwise approach to integrating the new essentials into a master's entry nursing curriculum

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Professional Nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.03.010
Heidi Johnston DNP, RN, Paul Smith PhD, RN, Julie Fitzwater PhD, RN, Delene Volkert PhD, RN
{"title":"A stepwise approach to integrating the new essentials into a master's entry nursing curriculum","authors":"Heidi Johnston DNP, RN,&nbsp;Paul Smith PhD, RN,&nbsp;Julie Fitzwater PhD, RN,&nbsp;Delene Volkert PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) released updated nursing curriculum Essentials in 2021. The new Essentials document reflects an innovative and unique approach to nursing education and provides a framework for competency-based education and assessment to prepare students to work in a profession that is ever-changing.</p><p>The first in the state of Oregon, a Masters Entry into Professional Nursing program was launched with a curriculum based on the new Essentials with the goal to remain true to the program's current concept-based approach while incorporating elements of a competency-based curriculum. As with all new programs, curricular design is paramount and requires careful planning to ensure the curriculum aligns with education trends, meets the needs of diverse learners, adheres to regulatory requirements and standards, and has strong faculty buy-in.</p><p>Curriculum development done in a systematic fashion with faculty input is imperative. All current faculty were invited by the school of nursing (SON) leadership to participate in the curriculum development process. Regularly scheduled meetings were held, and all interested faculty participants were able to provide input. This process also included the SON Curriculum Committee and SON Faculty Council, to ensure all faculty were included in the process and appraised of the curriculum development. The faculty members who participated in the systematic development process then served as advocates for the new curriculum and helped create a smooth transition when the new MEPN program was introduced.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Nursing","volume":"52 ","pages":"Pages 56-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722324000504","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) released updated nursing curriculum Essentials in 2021. The new Essentials document reflects an innovative and unique approach to nursing education and provides a framework for competency-based education and assessment to prepare students to work in a profession that is ever-changing.

The first in the state of Oregon, a Masters Entry into Professional Nursing program was launched with a curriculum based on the new Essentials with the goal to remain true to the program's current concept-based approach while incorporating elements of a competency-based curriculum. As with all new programs, curricular design is paramount and requires careful planning to ensure the curriculum aligns with education trends, meets the needs of diverse learners, adheres to regulatory requirements and standards, and has strong faculty buy-in.

Curriculum development done in a systematic fashion with faculty input is imperative. All current faculty were invited by the school of nursing (SON) leadership to participate in the curriculum development process. Regularly scheduled meetings were held, and all interested faculty participants were able to provide input. This process also included the SON Curriculum Committee and SON Faculty Council, to ensure all faculty were included in the process and appraised of the curriculum development. The faculty members who participated in the systematic development process then served as advocates for the new curriculum and helped create a smooth transition when the new MEPN program was introduced.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循序渐进地将新要点纳入护理硕士入学课程
美国护理学院协会(AACN)于 2021 年发布了最新的护理课程要点。新的《要点》文件反映了护理教育的创新和独特方法,并为基于能力的教育和评估提供了一个框架,使学生为在不断变化的职业中工作做好准备。俄勒冈州的第一个专业护理硕士入学课程是根据新的《要点》推出的,其目标是忠实于该课程当前基于概念的方法,同时融入基于能力的课程元素。与所有新项目一样,课程设计至关重要,需要精心规划,以确保课程符合教育趋势,满足不同学习者的需求,遵守监管要求和标准,并得到教职员工的大力支持。护理学院(SON)领导邀请所有在职教师参与课程开发过程。学校定期召开会议,所有感兴趣的教职员工都可以提供意见和建议。这一过程还包括 SON 课程委员会和 SON 教师理事会,以确保所有教师都参与到这一过程中,并对课程开发进行评估。参与系统开发过程的教职员工随后成为新课程的倡导者,并在新的 MEPN 课程推出时帮助实现平稳过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal will accept articles that focus on baccalaureate and higher degree nursing education, educational research, policy related to education, and education and practice partnerships. Reports of original work, research, reviews, insightful descriptions, and policy papers focusing on baccalaureate and graduate nursing education will be published.
期刊最新文献
Nursing students' personality traits, sleep quality, social media addiction, and academic performance: A multi-site structural equation model analysis Comparing characteristics of underrepresented versus majority student groups enrolled in US nursing programs Using data to drive programmatic change: Recalculating NCLEX-RN success Expanding clinical placement opportunities: Exploring night shift experiences for nursing students Newly graduated and nurse resident competencies: Perceptions of nurse faculty and acute care hospital leaders in the state of Maryland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1