No generality in biodiversity-productivity relationships along elevation in temperate and subtropical forest landscapes

IF 3.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecosystems Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100187
Jiayun Zou , Yahuang Luo , Rupert Seidl , Dominik Thom , Jie Liu , Lisa Geres , Tobias Richter , Linjiang Ye , Wei Zheng , Liangliang Ma , Jie Song , Kun Xu , Dezhu Li , Lianming Gao , Sebastian Seibold
{"title":"No generality in biodiversity-productivity relationships along elevation in temperate and subtropical forest landscapes","authors":"Jiayun Zou ,&nbsp;Yahuang Luo ,&nbsp;Rupert Seidl ,&nbsp;Dominik Thom ,&nbsp;Jie Liu ,&nbsp;Lisa Geres ,&nbsp;Tobias Richter ,&nbsp;Linjiang Ye ,&nbsp;Wei Zheng ,&nbsp;Liangliang Ma ,&nbsp;Jie Song ,&nbsp;Kun Xu ,&nbsp;Dezhu Li ,&nbsp;Lianming Gao ,&nbsp;Sebastian Seibold","doi":"10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An improved understanding of biodiversity-productivity relationships (BPRs) along environmental gradients is crucial for effective ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation. The <em>stress-gradient hypothesis</em> suggests that BPRs are stronger in stressful environments compared to more favorable conditions. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the variation of BPRs along elevational gradients and their generality across different landscapes. To study how BPRs change with elevation, we harnessed inventory data on 6,431 trees from 152 plots surveyed twice in eight to ten year intervals in mountain forests of temperate Europe and subtropical Asia. We quantified the relationship between aboveground productivity and different biodiversity measures, including taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity. To elucidate the processes underlying BPRs, we studied the variation of different functional traits along elevation across landscapes. We found no general pattern of BPRs across landscapes and elevations. Relationships were neutral for all biodiversity measures in temperate forests, and negative for taxonomic and functional diversity in subtropical forests. BPRs were largely congruent between taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity. We found only weak support for the <em>stress-gradient hypothesis</em>, with BPRs turning from negative to positive (effect not significant) close to the tree line in subtropical forests. In temperate forests, however, elevation patterns were strongly modulated by species identity effects as influenced by specific traits. The effect of traits such as community-weighted mean of maximum plant height and wood density on productivity was congruent across landscapes. Our study highlights the context-dependence of BPRs across elevation gradients and landscapes. Species traits are key modulating factors of BPRs and should be considered more explicitly in studies of the functional role of biodiversity. Furthermore, our findings highlight that potential trade-offs between conserving biodiversity and fostering ecosystem productivity exist, which require more attention in policy and management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54270,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecosystems","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S219756202400023X/pdfft?md5=0e7238736a09be8b76cda38364902c5f&pid=1-s2.0-S219756202400023X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S219756202400023X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An improved understanding of biodiversity-productivity relationships (BPRs) along environmental gradients is crucial for effective ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation. The stress-gradient hypothesis suggests that BPRs are stronger in stressful environments compared to more favorable conditions. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the variation of BPRs along elevational gradients and their generality across different landscapes. To study how BPRs change with elevation, we harnessed inventory data on 6,431 trees from 152 plots surveyed twice in eight to ten year intervals in mountain forests of temperate Europe and subtropical Asia. We quantified the relationship between aboveground productivity and different biodiversity measures, including taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity. To elucidate the processes underlying BPRs, we studied the variation of different functional traits along elevation across landscapes. We found no general pattern of BPRs across landscapes and elevations. Relationships were neutral for all biodiversity measures in temperate forests, and negative for taxonomic and functional diversity in subtropical forests. BPRs were largely congruent between taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity. We found only weak support for the stress-gradient hypothesis, with BPRs turning from negative to positive (effect not significant) close to the tree line in subtropical forests. In temperate forests, however, elevation patterns were strongly modulated by species identity effects as influenced by specific traits. The effect of traits such as community-weighted mean of maximum plant height and wood density on productivity was congruent across landscapes. Our study highlights the context-dependence of BPRs across elevation gradients and landscapes. Species traits are key modulating factors of BPRs and should be considered more explicitly in studies of the functional role of biodiversity. Furthermore, our findings highlight that potential trade-offs between conserving biodiversity and fostering ecosystem productivity exist, which require more attention in policy and management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在温带和亚热带森林景观中,生物多样性与生产率之间的关系没有随海拔高度而变化的普遍性
更好地了解环境梯度上的生物多样性-生产力关系(BPRs)对于有效的生态系统管理和生物多样性保护至关重要。压力-梯度假说认为,与更有利的条件相比,压力环境中的生物多样性-生产力关系更强。然而,人们对 BPRs 沿海拔梯度的变化及其在不同地貌中的普遍性了解有限。为了研究 BPR 如何随海拔高度而变化,我们利用了温带欧洲和亚热带亚洲山地森林中 152 个地块的 6431 棵树的库存数据,这些数据每隔八到十年调查两次。我们量化了地上生产力与不同生物多样性指标之间的关系,包括分类、功能和系统发育多样性。为了阐明BPR的基本过程,我们研究了不同功能特征在不同地貌上随海拔高度的变化。我们发现,不同地貌和海拔的 BPRs 没有普遍的模式。在温带森林中,所有生物多样性指标的关系都是中性的,而在亚热带森林中,分类和功能多样性的关系则是负的。分类学、功能和系统发育多样性之间的生物变异系数基本一致。我们发现压力梯度假说仅得到微弱支持,在亚热带森林中,BPRs 在接近树线时由负转正(影响不显著)。然而,在温带森林中,海拔模式受到物种特征效应的强烈调节,并受到特定性状的影响。群落加权最大植株高度平均值和木材密度等性状对生产力的影响在不同地貌中是一致的。我们的研究强调了生物生产力指标在不同海拔梯度和地貌条件下的环境依赖性。物种性状是生物生产力因子的关键调节因素,在研究生物多样性的功能作用时应更明确地加以考虑。此外,我们的研究结果突出表明,在保护生物多样性和提高生态系统生产力之间存在潜在的权衡,这需要在政策和管理方面给予更多关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecosystems
Forest Ecosystems Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1115
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecosystems is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing scientific communications from any discipline that can provide interesting contributions about the structure and dynamics of "natural" and "domesticated" forest ecosystems, and their services to people. The journal welcomes innovative science as well as application oriented work that will enhance understanding of woody plant communities. Very specific studies are welcome if they are part of a thematic series that provides some holistic perspective that is of general interest.
期刊最新文献
Relationships between charcoal property and post fire productivity in the boreal forest Evaluating tree branch angle measurements of European beech using terrestrial laser scanning Assessment of the heartwood contribution to carbon accumulation in Pinus sylvestris L. trees under different forest site conditions Drivers and patterns of community completeness suggest that Tuscan Fagus sylvatica forests can naturally have a low plant diversity Sensitivity of gross primary production and evapotranspiration to heat and drought stress in a young temperate plantation in northern China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1