Assessment of the effect of long-term serum storage for retrospective serologic diagnosis of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis)

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1016/j.cimid.2024.102170
Melina Karagkouni , Katerina Spilioti , Eleftherios Meletis , Polychronis Kostoulas , Christos Koutinas , Konstantina Theodorou , Edward B. Breitschwerdt , Mathios E. Mylonakis
{"title":"Assessment of the effect of long-term serum storage for retrospective serologic diagnosis of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis)","authors":"Melina Karagkouni ,&nbsp;Katerina Spilioti ,&nbsp;Eleftherios Meletis ,&nbsp;Polychronis Kostoulas ,&nbsp;Christos Koutinas ,&nbsp;Konstantina Theodorou ,&nbsp;Edward B. Breitschwerdt ,&nbsp;Mathios E. Mylonakis","doi":"10.1016/j.cimid.2024.102170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is currently sparse information on the possible effect of long-term storage of serum specimens for the retrospective serodiagnosis of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (CME). The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between the original serologic outcome and the results of a repeat indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) assay for the detection of IgG antibodies against <em>E. canis</em>. A secondary aim was to compare the diagnostic performance of two commercially available point-of-care (POC) immunochromatographic (IC) assays. Archived serum samples originally tested as positive (n=66) or negative (n=19) for <em>E. canis</em> IgG antibodies and kept frozen at −20°C for a median of 22 years, were retrospectively examined by IFA and by two POC IC assays. Cohen’s Kappa coefficient (0.748, p &lt; 0.0001), indicated a substantial agreement between the original and repeat serologic testing results. An almost identical high sensitivity and moderate specificity were established for the two POC IC assays. Canine serum specimens on long-term storage may still be of value for seroepidemiologic surveys investigating the exposure to <em>E. canis</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50999,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 102170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014795712400047X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is currently sparse information on the possible effect of long-term storage of serum specimens for the retrospective serodiagnosis of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (CME). The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between the original serologic outcome and the results of a repeat indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) assay for the detection of IgG antibodies against E. canis. A secondary aim was to compare the diagnostic performance of two commercially available point-of-care (POC) immunochromatographic (IC) assays. Archived serum samples originally tested as positive (n=66) or negative (n=19) for E. canis IgG antibodies and kept frozen at −20°C for a median of 22 years, were retrospectively examined by IFA and by two POC IC assays. Cohen’s Kappa coefficient (0.748, p < 0.0001), indicated a substantial agreement between the original and repeat serologic testing results. An almost identical high sensitivity and moderate specificity were established for the two POC IC assays. Canine serum specimens on long-term storage may still be of value for seroepidemiologic surveys investigating the exposure to E. canis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估长期储存血清对犬单核细胞埃希氏菌病(犬埃希氏菌)回顾性血清学诊断的影响
目前,有关长期保存血清标本对犬单核细胞埃希氏菌病(CME)血清学回顾性诊断可能产生的影响的信息还很少。本研究旨在评估原始血清学结果与重复间接荧光抗体(IFA)检测犬单胞埃希氏菌 IgG 抗体结果之间的一致性。研究的另一个目的是比较两种市场上销售的护理点(POC)免疫层析(IC)测定的诊断性能。通过 IFA 和两种 POC IC 检测法对最初检测为犬大肠杆菌 IgG 抗体阳性(样本数=66)或阴性(样本数=19)并在零下 20 摄氏度冷冻保存了中位 22 年的存档血清样本进行了回顾性检测。Cohen's Kappa系数(0.748,p < 0.0001)表明,原始血清学检测结果与重复检测结果基本一致。两种 POC IC 检测方法的灵敏度和特异性几乎相同。长期保存的犬血清标本对于调查犬伊蚊暴露的血清流行病学调查仍有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Comparative Immunology, Microbiology & Infectious Diseases aims to respond to the concept of "One Medicine" and to provide a venue for scientific exchange. Based on the concept of "Comparative Medicine" interdisciplinary cooperation between specialists in human and animal medicine is of mutual interest and benefit. Therefore, there is need to combine the respective interest of physicians, veterinarians and other health professionals for comparative studies relevant to either human or animal medicine . The journal is open to subjects of common interest related to the immunology, immunopathology, microbiology, parasitology and epidemiology of human and animal infectious diseases, especially zoonotic infections, and animal models of human infectious diseases. The role of environmental factors in disease emergence is emphasized. CIMID is mainly focusing on applied veterinary and human medicine rather than on fundamental experimental research.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and associated risk factors of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis in humans and cattle populations: A comprehensive study. Cladistics and population structure analysis of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in Haryana, India based on genes encoding the major surface proteins Editorial Board Molecular typing of Protoparvovirus carnivoran 1 in Egyptian cats diagnosed with feline panleukopenia The first report of concurrent infection of hemorrhagic septicemia with foot and mouth disease in cattle in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1