EEG oscillatory evidence for the temporal dynamics of divergent and convergent thinking in the verbal knowledge domain

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2024.101828
Vera Eymann , Thomas Lachmann , Ann-Kathrin Beck , Daniela Czernochowski
{"title":"EEG oscillatory evidence for the temporal dynamics of divergent and convergent thinking in the verbal knowledge domain","authors":"Vera Eymann ,&nbsp;Thomas Lachmann ,&nbsp;Ann-Kathrin Beck ,&nbsp;Daniela Czernochowski","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2024.101828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates neural mechanisms of divergent and convergent thinking in the verbal knowledge domain while taking into account activation related to working memory (WM). Divergent thinking was assessed using the Alternate Uses Task (AUT) and convergent thinking using the Compound Remote Associates task (RAT). We analyzed upper alpha band (10–12 Hz) oscillatory activity, in which we accounted for the temporal dynamics of both thinking processes by investigating three different time points during each trial for both tasks. We subtracted WM-related oscillatory activity measured by a serial recall task within the same knowledge domain and by using highly similar stimulus material as in both divergent and convergent thinking tasks. Our results show a strong upper alpha synchronization during divergent relative to convergent thinking, most pronounced at fronto-parietal electrodes. Moreover, we observed highest synchronization towards the middle (in contrast to the beginning and end) of each trial during both thinking processes. The results of the present study extend previous findings in the visuo-spatial knowledge domain, using a highly similar analytical approach to investigate divergent and convergent thinking. Together, these findings provide theoretical implications on how divergent and convergent thinking interact beyond WM across different knowledge domains by emphasizing their complex interplay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 101828"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000229/pdfft?md5=33ab0c0b8fb4cf05c2fefa4a7e14ce4d&pid=1-s2.0-S0160289624000229-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates neural mechanisms of divergent and convergent thinking in the verbal knowledge domain while taking into account activation related to working memory (WM). Divergent thinking was assessed using the Alternate Uses Task (AUT) and convergent thinking using the Compound Remote Associates task (RAT). We analyzed upper alpha band (10–12 Hz) oscillatory activity, in which we accounted for the temporal dynamics of both thinking processes by investigating three different time points during each trial for both tasks. We subtracted WM-related oscillatory activity measured by a serial recall task within the same knowledge domain and by using highly similar stimulus material as in both divergent and convergent thinking tasks. Our results show a strong upper alpha synchronization during divergent relative to convergent thinking, most pronounced at fronto-parietal electrodes. Moreover, we observed highest synchronization towards the middle (in contrast to the beginning and end) of each trial during both thinking processes. The results of the present study extend previous findings in the visuo-spatial knowledge domain, using a highly similar analytical approach to investigate divergent and convergent thinking. Together, these findings provide theoretical implications on how divergent and convergent thinking interact beyond WM across different knowledge domains by emphasizing their complex interplay.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言知识领域发散思维和聚合思维时间动态的脑电图振荡证据
本研究调查了语言知识领域中发散思维和聚合思维的神经机制,同时考虑了与工作记忆(WM)相关的激活。发散思维通过 "交替使用任务"(AUT)进行评估,收敛思维通过 "复合远程联想任务"(RAT)进行评估。我们分析了α波段上部(10-12赫兹)的振荡活动,在这两个任务中,我们通过在每次试验中调查三个不同的时间点来考虑两个思维过程的时间动态。我们还减去了通过在同一知识领域内进行连续回忆任务以及使用与发散思维和聚合思维任务高度相似的刺激材料所测得的与 WM 相关的振荡活动。我们的研究结果表明,相对于收敛思维,发散思维过程中存在较强的上阿尔法同步现象,这种现象在前顶叶电极上最为明显。此外,我们还观察到,在两种思维过程中,每次试验的中间(而不是开始和结束)同步化程度最高。本研究的结果扩展了之前在视觉空间知识领域的发现,使用了高度相似的分析方法来研究发散思维和收敛思维。这些研究结果强调了发散思维和聚合思维之间复杂的相互作用,从而对不同知识领域的发散思维和聚合思维如何在WM之外相互作用提供了理论意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence
Intelligence PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.
期刊最新文献
Looking beyond students' exploration and learning strategies: The role of test-taking effort in complex problem-solving Reconsidering the search for alternatives to general mental ability tests Putting the Flynn effect under the microscope: Item-level patterns in NLSYC PIAT-math scores, 1986–2004 Editorial Board The AI attribution gap: Encouraging transparent acknowledgment in the age of AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1