Analysis of the relationship between religion, abortion, and assisted reproductive technology: Insights into cross-national public opinion

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Social Science Research Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103012
Amy Adamczyk , Brittany Suh , Lindsay Lerner
{"title":"Analysis of the relationship between religion, abortion, and assisted reproductive technology: Insights into cross-national public opinion","authors":"Amy Adamczyk ,&nbsp;Brittany Suh ,&nbsp;Lindsay Lerner","doi":"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With advancement in reproductive technologies, public opinion regarding these procedures varies considerably across the world. While prominent public debates have focused on abortion, we know less about the factors shaping feelings regarding Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART). Both procedures challenge the idea that human life starts with conception – with the fertilization of an embryo. Using European Values Survey data and multilevel modeling, we compare how religion and other personal and country-level factors shape disapproval toward abortion and ART. Conservative Protestants and people who are more engaged with their religion and live in a more religious country are more likely to disapprove of abortion and ART. More supportive polices and attitudes regarding ART, but not abortion, are correlated. Additionally, economic development moderates the relationship between personal religiosity and abortion, but not ART. This finding provides important insight into why abortion has remained such a controversial issue, even in richer nations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48338,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Research","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103012"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X24000346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With advancement in reproductive technologies, public opinion regarding these procedures varies considerably across the world. While prominent public debates have focused on abortion, we know less about the factors shaping feelings regarding Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART). Both procedures challenge the idea that human life starts with conception – with the fertilization of an embryo. Using European Values Survey data and multilevel modeling, we compare how religion and other personal and country-level factors shape disapproval toward abortion and ART. Conservative Protestants and people who are more engaged with their religion and live in a more religious country are more likely to disapprove of abortion and ART. More supportive polices and attitudes regarding ART, but not abortion, are correlated. Additionally, economic development moderates the relationship between personal religiosity and abortion, but not ART. This finding provides important insight into why abortion has remained such a controversial issue, even in richer nations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析宗教、堕胎和辅助生殖技术之间的关系:洞察跨国舆论
随着生殖技术的发展,世界各地公众对这些程序的看法大相径庭。公众辩论的焦点主要集中在堕胎问题上,但我们对影响人们对辅助生殖技术(ART)的看法的因素了解较少。这两种程序都对人类生命始于受孕--胚胎受精--的观念提出了挑战。利用欧洲价值观调查数据和多层次建模,我们比较了宗教和其他个人及国家层面的因素如何影响人们对堕胎和 ART 的不认同。保守的新教徒、宗教信仰更浓厚的人以及生活在宗教信仰更浓厚的国家的人更有可能不赞成堕胎和抗逆转录病毒疗法。更支持抗逆转录病毒疗法的政策与人们的态度相关,但与堕胎无关。此外,经济发展会调节个人宗教信仰与堕胎之间的关系,但不会调节抗逆转录病毒疗法之间的关系。这一发现为我们提供了重要的启示,让我们了解为什么堕胎即使在较富裕的国家仍然是一个如此有争议的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Social Science Research publishes papers devoted to quantitative social science research and methodology. The journal features articles that illustrate the use of quantitative methods in the empirical solution of substantive problems, and emphasizes those concerned with issues or methods that cut across traditional disciplinary lines. Special attention is given to methods that have been used by only one particular social science discipline, but that may have application to a broader range of areas.
期刊最新文献
Do minority inclusive institutions increase electoral support for radical-right parties? Educational assortative mating and couples’ linked occupational trajectories in China Gender bias in evaluating assistant professorship applicants? Evidence from harmonized survey experiments in Germany and Italy Impact of layoffs on mortality and physical health in transitional China 1989–2015 Political and educational dynamics behind the Evangelicals’ stance against mask mandates during COVID-19 in the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1