Government Accounting Policy Of Oil And Gas Revenue After Implementation Gross Split Contract: Quo Vadis?

Joko Aprianto, Puji Wibowo
{"title":"Government Accounting Policy Of Oil And Gas Revenue After Implementation Gross Split Contract: Quo Vadis?","authors":"Joko Aprianto, Puji Wibowo","doi":"10.54957/jolas.v4i2.760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Production Sharing Contract (PSC) is a popular scheme for managing interests between oil and gas companies as contractors and the central government as a principal. PSC has been becoming attractive for contractors because the contract provides an incentive, and cost-recovery scheme, whereas all production costs during exploration and exploitation stages would be recovered by the government. However, this long-standing contract creates serious problems regarding efficiency and government revenue aspects. To address these issues, in early 2017, the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources stipulate a new regulation to propose a new scheme contract namely gross-split. This policy aims to promote more investment in the oil and gas exploration sector so that lifting can be increased, and also, as an effort to eliminate the debate over cost recovery. In contrast to the cost recovery PSC, in a gross split PSC, there is no longer an assume and discharge facility for indirect taxes and other levies given to contractors. This study aims to determine the implications of the PSC gross split on the oil and gas revenue accounting policy. The author conducted interviews with several informants and analyzed the data using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman. As a result, the gross split implies the recognition of Oil and Gas revenue using gross principle","PeriodicalId":237917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science","volume":"83 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54957/jolas.v4i2.760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Production Sharing Contract (PSC) is a popular scheme for managing interests between oil and gas companies as contractors and the central government as a principal. PSC has been becoming attractive for contractors because the contract provides an incentive, and cost-recovery scheme, whereas all production costs during exploration and exploitation stages would be recovered by the government. However, this long-standing contract creates serious problems regarding efficiency and government revenue aspects. To address these issues, in early 2017, the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources stipulate a new regulation to propose a new scheme contract namely gross-split. This policy aims to promote more investment in the oil and gas exploration sector so that lifting can be increased, and also, as an effort to eliminate the debate over cost recovery. In contrast to the cost recovery PSC, in a gross split PSC, there is no longer an assume and discharge facility for indirect taxes and other levies given to contractors. This study aims to determine the implications of the PSC gross split on the oil and gas revenue accounting policy. The author conducted interviews with several informants and analyzed the data using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman. As a result, the gross split implies the recognition of Oil and Gas revenue using gross principle
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施总分包合同后石油和天然气收入的政府会计政策:何去何从?
生产分成合同(PSC)是管理作为承包商的石油和天然气公司与作为委托人的中央政府之间利益的一种流行方案。生产分成合同对承包商越来越有吸引力,因为合同提供了激励机制和成本回收计划,而勘探和开采阶段的所有生产成本都将由政府回收。然而,这种长期存在的合同在效率和政府收入方面造成了严重问题。为了解决这些问题,2017 年初,能源和矿产资源部制定了一项新法规,提出了新的计划合同,即毛利分成。这一政策旨在促进对油气勘探领域的更多投资,从而提高开采量,同时也是为了消除关于成本回收的争论。与成本回收型 PSC 不同的是,在毛分离型 PSC 中,承包商不再承担间接税和其他税费。本研究旨在确定石油和天然气公司分成毛额对石油和天然气收入会计政策的影响。作者对几位信息提供者进行了访谈,并使用迈尔斯和休伯曼的互动模型对数据进行了分析。结果表明,毛额分割意味着石油和天然气收入的确认采用毛额原则
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Green Infrastructure Framework: Sebuah Strategi Pembangunan Infrastruktur Hijau Nasional Kepastian Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Sesuai Dengan Ketentuan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen Paradoks HAM Dalam Hubungan Internasional: Humanitarian Intervention Di Suriah Pencegahan Praktik Insider Trading Melalui Metode Code of Conduct Keterwakilan Perempuan Di Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Kota Semarang Tahun 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1