Selecting a Literacy Intervention and Planning for Implementation: A Guide

Colleen E. Whittingham, Paola Pilonieta, Erin K. Washburn
{"title":"Selecting a Literacy Intervention and Planning for Implementation: A Guide","authors":"Colleen E. Whittingham, Paola Pilonieta, Erin K. Washburn","doi":"10.1002/trtr.2323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence‐based core instruction partnered with evidence‐based supplemental interventions are vital for students' literacy learning, particularly for students who need additional support (Petscher et al., 2020). Identifying instructional materials that reflect the translation of effective practices is challenging, (Solari et al., 2020) and made trickier by an abundance of commercialized and packaged literacy curricula, all claiming to be research‐ or evidence‐based. The tasks of finding, selecting, and implementing literacy interventions that are high‐quality, evidence‐based, and designed to meet the needs of students is not for the faint of heart, especially because school leaders often have difficulty distinguishing programs based on research evidence from those benefiting from good marketing (Schwartz, 2019). Thus, the purpose of this article is to provide school personnel responsible for implementing literacy interventions (i.e., classroom teachers, literacy specialists, special educators) and/or selecting literacy intervention programs (i.e., administrators, instructional coaches) with a step‐by‐step process informed by our study which surveyed North Carolina first grade teachers' literacy assessment and instruction practices in schools receiving Title I funding before and during the COVID pandemic.","PeriodicalId":512399,"journal":{"name":"The Reading Teacher","volume":"66 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Reading Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence‐based core instruction partnered with evidence‐based supplemental interventions are vital for students' literacy learning, particularly for students who need additional support (Petscher et al., 2020). Identifying instructional materials that reflect the translation of effective practices is challenging, (Solari et al., 2020) and made trickier by an abundance of commercialized and packaged literacy curricula, all claiming to be research‐ or evidence‐based. The tasks of finding, selecting, and implementing literacy interventions that are high‐quality, evidence‐based, and designed to meet the needs of students is not for the faint of heart, especially because school leaders often have difficulty distinguishing programs based on research evidence from those benefiting from good marketing (Schwartz, 2019). Thus, the purpose of this article is to provide school personnel responsible for implementing literacy interventions (i.e., classroom teachers, literacy specialists, special educators) and/or selecting literacy intervention programs (i.e., administrators, instructional coaches) with a step‐by‐step process informed by our study which surveyed North Carolina first grade teachers' literacy assessment and instruction practices in schools receiving Title I funding before and during the COVID pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择读写能力干预措施并制定实施计划:指南
以实证为基础的核心教学与以实证为基础的补充干预措施相结合,对学生的读写学习,尤其是需要额外支持的学生的读写学习至关重要(Petscher et al.)确定反映有效实践转化的教学材料是一项挑战,(Solari et al.寻找、选择和实施高质量、以证据为基础、旨在满足学生需求的扫盲干预措施并非易事,尤其是因为学校领导往往难以区分基于研究证据的项目和那些得益于良好营销的项目(Schwartz,2019)。因此,本文旨在为负责实施扫盲干预的学校人员(即班主任、扫盲专家、特殊教育工作者)和/或选择扫盲干预项目的人员(即行政人员、教学指导人员)提供一个循序渐进的过程,该过程参考了我们的研究,我们的研究在COVID大流行之前和期间调查了北卡罗来纳州接受Title I资助的学校中一年级教师的扫盲评估和教学实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Collaborative Literacy Coaching Framework for Transformation: Humanizing Prerequisites for Reflective Practitioners Connecting Compassion: Empathy's Role in STEM and Literacy Integration Correction to “In This Issue 77:6” Motivating Engagement with Literature: Using the Individual Story Ending (ISE) Method to Reveal Personal Reading Experiences Playing with Words: Scaffolding Writing through Poetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1