Colleen E. Whittingham, Paola Pilonieta, Erin K. Washburn
{"title":"Selecting a Literacy Intervention and Planning for Implementation: A Guide","authors":"Colleen E. Whittingham, Paola Pilonieta, Erin K. Washburn","doi":"10.1002/trtr.2323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence‐based core instruction partnered with evidence‐based supplemental interventions are vital for students' literacy learning, particularly for students who need additional support (Petscher et al., 2020). Identifying instructional materials that reflect the translation of effective practices is challenging, (Solari et al., 2020) and made trickier by an abundance of commercialized and packaged literacy curricula, all claiming to be research‐ or evidence‐based. The tasks of finding, selecting, and implementing literacy interventions that are high‐quality, evidence‐based, and designed to meet the needs of students is not for the faint of heart, especially because school leaders often have difficulty distinguishing programs based on research evidence from those benefiting from good marketing (Schwartz, 2019). Thus, the purpose of this article is to provide school personnel responsible for implementing literacy interventions (i.e., classroom teachers, literacy specialists, special educators) and/or selecting literacy intervention programs (i.e., administrators, instructional coaches) with a step‐by‐step process informed by our study which surveyed North Carolina first grade teachers' literacy assessment and instruction practices in schools receiving Title I funding before and during the COVID pandemic.","PeriodicalId":512399,"journal":{"name":"The Reading Teacher","volume":"66 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Reading Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Evidence‐based core instruction partnered with evidence‐based supplemental interventions are vital for students' literacy learning, particularly for students who need additional support (Petscher et al., 2020). Identifying instructional materials that reflect the translation of effective practices is challenging, (Solari et al., 2020) and made trickier by an abundance of commercialized and packaged literacy curricula, all claiming to be research‐ or evidence‐based. The tasks of finding, selecting, and implementing literacy interventions that are high‐quality, evidence‐based, and designed to meet the needs of students is not for the faint of heart, especially because school leaders often have difficulty distinguishing programs based on research evidence from those benefiting from good marketing (Schwartz, 2019). Thus, the purpose of this article is to provide school personnel responsible for implementing literacy interventions (i.e., classroom teachers, literacy specialists, special educators) and/or selecting literacy intervention programs (i.e., administrators, instructional coaches) with a step‐by‐step process informed by our study which surveyed North Carolina first grade teachers' literacy assessment and instruction practices in schools receiving Title I funding before and during the COVID pandemic.
以实证为基础的核心教学与以实证为基础的补充干预措施相结合,对学生的读写学习,尤其是需要额外支持的学生的读写学习至关重要(Petscher et al.)确定反映有效实践转化的教学材料是一项挑战,(Solari et al.寻找、选择和实施高质量、以证据为基础、旨在满足学生需求的扫盲干预措施并非易事,尤其是因为学校领导往往难以区分基于研究证据的项目和那些得益于良好营销的项目(Schwartz,2019)。因此,本文旨在为负责实施扫盲干预的学校人员(即班主任、扫盲专家、特殊教育工作者)和/或选择扫盲干预项目的人员(即行政人员、教学指导人员)提供一个循序渐进的过程,该过程参考了我们的研究,我们的研究在COVID大流行之前和期间调查了北卡罗来纳州接受Title I资助的学校中一年级教师的扫盲评估和教学实践。