Performance Evaluation of Collision Avoidance for Multi-node LoRa Networks based on TDMA and CSMA Algorithm

I. G. D. Nugraha, Edwiansyah Zaky Ashadi, Ardiansyah Musa Efendi
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Collision Avoidance for Multi-node LoRa Networks based on TDMA and CSMA Algorithm","authors":"I. G. D. Nugraha, Edwiansyah Zaky Ashadi, Ardiansyah Musa Efendi","doi":"10.58346/jowua.2024.i1.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LoRa can be used as the communication technology for the intelligent monitoring system. However, LoRa is usually used for outdoor communication. The usage of LoRa as indoor communication has many challenges. One of the challenges is that collision happens when using standard LoRa devices with only one channel. The algorithms based on TDMA (Time-division Multiple Access) and CSMA (Carrier-sense Multiple Access) protocols can be used to address this challenge. These two algorithms can be modified by applying the device that is the center of the network (gateway) as a central control and the data transmitter (sensor node) as a passive device. The test was conducted on the Intelligent Laboratory Monitoring System to evaluate this design on a multi-node LoRa network. RSSI testing proves that the distance and building interference affect the signal strength or RSSI of sensor nodes, so the average RSSI value is -73.75 with an RSSI threshold of value -106. The gateway successfully collected each sensor node data with an average success of about 64.953%. The experiment results show the success rate of the CSMA-based algorithm is 10% versus 100% in TDMA-based algorithm; the delay is 4125 ms for CSMA-based and 428.3 ms for TDMA-based. This result means that the CSMA-based algorithm is more complex, takes more time to process the data than the TDMA-based algorithm, has a low success rate, and is more prone to collisions.","PeriodicalId":38235,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications","volume":"62 46","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58346/jowua.2024.i1.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

LoRa can be used as the communication technology for the intelligent monitoring system. However, LoRa is usually used for outdoor communication. The usage of LoRa as indoor communication has many challenges. One of the challenges is that collision happens when using standard LoRa devices with only one channel. The algorithms based on TDMA (Time-division Multiple Access) and CSMA (Carrier-sense Multiple Access) protocols can be used to address this challenge. These two algorithms can be modified by applying the device that is the center of the network (gateway) as a central control and the data transmitter (sensor node) as a passive device. The test was conducted on the Intelligent Laboratory Monitoring System to evaluate this design on a multi-node LoRa network. RSSI testing proves that the distance and building interference affect the signal strength or RSSI of sensor nodes, so the average RSSI value is -73.75 with an RSSI threshold of value -106. The gateway successfully collected each sensor node data with an average success of about 64.953%. The experiment results show the success rate of the CSMA-based algorithm is 10% versus 100% in TDMA-based algorithm; the delay is 4125 ms for CSMA-based and 428.3 ms for TDMA-based. This result means that the CSMA-based algorithm is more complex, takes more time to process the data than the TDMA-based algorithm, has a low success rate, and is more prone to collisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于 TDMA 和 CSMA 算法的多节点 LoRa 网络防碰撞性能评估
LoRa 可用作智能监控系统的通信技术。不过,LoRa 通常用于室外通信。将 LoRa 用作室内通信有许多挑战。其中一个挑战是,使用只有一个信道的标准 LoRa 设备时会发生碰撞。基于 TDMA(时分多址)和 CSMA(载波侦测多址)协议的算法可用于解决这一难题。这两种算法可以通过将作为网络中心的设备(网关)用作中央控制和将数据发送器(传感器节点)用作被动设备进行修改。测试是在智能实验室监控系统上进行的,目的是在多节点 LoRa 网络上评估这一设计。RSSI 测试证明,距离和建筑物干扰会影响传感器节点的信号强度或 RSSI,因此 RSSI 平均值为 -73.75,RSSI 临界值为 -106。网关成功采集了每个传感器节点的数据,平均成功率约为 64.953%。实验结果显示,基于 CSMA 算法的成功率为 10%,而基于 TDMA 算法的成功率为 100%;基于 CSMA 算法的延迟为 4125 ms,而基于 TDMA 算法的延迟为 428.3 ms。这一结果说明,基于 CSMA 的算法比基于 TDMA 的算法更复杂,处理数据的时间更长,成功率更低,而且更容易发生碰撞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JoWUA is an online peer-reviewed journal and aims to provide an international forum for researchers, professionals, and industrial practitioners on all topics related to wireless mobile networks, ubiquitous computing, and their dependable applications. JoWUA consists of high-quality technical manuscripts on advances in the state-of-the-art of wireless mobile networks, ubiquitous computing, and their dependable applications; both theoretical approaches and practical approaches are encouraged to submit. All published articles in JoWUA are freely accessible in this website because it is an open access journal. JoWUA has four issues (March, June, September, December) per year with special issues covering specific research areas by guest editors.
期刊最新文献
Trust based Routing – A Novel Approach for Data Security in WSN based Data Critical Applications Performance Evaluation of Collision Avoidance for Multi-node LoRa Networks based on TDMA and CSMA Algorithm Human-Centric AI : Enhancing User Experience through Natural Language Interfaces A Study on the Implementation of a Network Function for Real-time False Base Station Detection for the Next Generation Mobile Communication Environment Investigating the Secrets, New Challenges, and Best Forensic Methods for Securing Critical Infrastructure Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1