Sleep behavioural outcomes of school-based interventions for promoting sleep health in children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years: A systematic review
C. Gaskin, C. Venegas Hargous, Lena D Stephens, Gunchmaa Nyam, Victoria Brown, Natalie Lander, Serene Yoong, B. Morrissey, Steven Allender, Claudia Strugnell
{"title":"Sleep behavioural outcomes of school-based interventions for promoting sleep health in children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years: A systematic review","authors":"C. Gaskin, C. Venegas Hargous, Lena D Stephens, Gunchmaa Nyam, Victoria Brown, Natalie Lander, Serene Yoong, B. Morrissey, Steven Allender, Claudia Strugnell","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Insufficient sleep is common among children and adolescents and can contribute to poor health. School-based interventions potentially could improve sleep behaviour due to their broad reach, but their effectiveness is unclear. This systematic review focused on the effects of school-based interventions on sleep behaviour among children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years.\n \n \n \n Five electronic databases were searched for randomised controlled trials of sleep health interventions initiated or conducted in school settings and in which behavioural sleep outcomes were measured. Cochrane risk of bias tools were used to assess study quality.\n \n \n \n From the 5,303 database records and two papers from other sources, 21 studies (22 papers) met the inclusion criteria for this review. These studies involved 10,867 children and adolescents at baseline from 13 countries. Most studies (n=15) were conducted in secondary schools. Sleep education was the most common intervention, either alone (n=13 studies) or combined with other initiatives (stress management training, n=2; bright light therapy, n=1; health education, n=1). Interventions were typically brief in terms of both the intervention period (median=4 weeks) and exposure (median=200 minutes). Behavioural outcomes included actigraphy-measured and self-reported sleep patterns, and sleep hygiene. All outcomes had high risk of bias or some concerns with bias. Sleep education interventions were typically ineffective. Later school start times promoted longer sleep duration over 1 week (1 study, high risk of bias).\n \n \n \n Current evidence does not provide school-based solutions for improving sleep health, perhaps highlighting a need for complex, multi-component interventions (e.g., whole-of-school approaches) to be trialled.\n","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":"18 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Insufficient sleep is common among children and adolescents and can contribute to poor health. School-based interventions potentially could improve sleep behaviour due to their broad reach, but their effectiveness is unclear. This systematic review focused on the effects of school-based interventions on sleep behaviour among children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years.
Five electronic databases were searched for randomised controlled trials of sleep health interventions initiated or conducted in school settings and in which behavioural sleep outcomes were measured. Cochrane risk of bias tools were used to assess study quality.
From the 5,303 database records and two papers from other sources, 21 studies (22 papers) met the inclusion criteria for this review. These studies involved 10,867 children and adolescents at baseline from 13 countries. Most studies (n=15) were conducted in secondary schools. Sleep education was the most common intervention, either alone (n=13 studies) or combined with other initiatives (stress management training, n=2; bright light therapy, n=1; health education, n=1). Interventions were typically brief in terms of both the intervention period (median=4 weeks) and exposure (median=200 minutes). Behavioural outcomes included actigraphy-measured and self-reported sleep patterns, and sleep hygiene. All outcomes had high risk of bias or some concerns with bias. Sleep education interventions were typically ineffective. Later school start times promoted longer sleep duration over 1 week (1 study, high risk of bias).
Current evidence does not provide school-based solutions for improving sleep health, perhaps highlighting a need for complex, multi-component interventions (e.g., whole-of-school approaches) to be trialled.