Pandemic policymaking affecting older adult volunteers during and after the COVID-19 public health crisis in the four nations of the UK

Jurgen Grotz, Lindsay Armstrong, Heather Edwards, Aileen Jones, Michael Locke, Laurel Smith, Ewen Speed, Linda Birt
{"title":"Pandemic policymaking affecting older adult volunteers during and after the COVID-19 public health crisis in the four nations of the UK","authors":"Jurgen Grotz, Lindsay Armstrong, Heather Edwards, Aileen Jones, Michael Locke, Laurel Smith, Ewen Speed, Linda Birt","doi":"10.1108/qaoa-11-2022-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to critically examine the effects of COVID-19 social discourses and policy decisions specifically on older adult volunteers in the UK, comparing the responses and their effects in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, providing perspectives on effects of policy changes designed to reduce risk of infection as a result of COVID-19, specifically on volunteer involvement of and for older adults, and understand, from the perspectives of volunteer managers, how COVID-19 restrictions had impacted older people’s volunteering and situating this within statutory public health policies.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study uses a critical discourse approach to explore, compare and contrast accounts of volunteering of and for older people in policy, and then compare the discourses within policy documents with the discourses in personal accounts of volunteering in health and social care settings in the four nations of the UK. This paper is co-produced in collaboration with co-authors who have direct experience with volunteer involvement responses and their impact on older people.\n\n\nFindings\nThe prevailing overall policy approach during the pandemic was that risk of morbidity and mortality to older people was too high to permit them to participate in volunteering activities. Disenfranchising of older people, as exemplified in volunteer involvement, was remarkably uniform across the four nations of the UK. However, the authors find that despite, rather than because of policy changes, older volunteers, as part of, or with the help of, volunteer involving organisations, are taking time to think and to reconsider their involvement and are renewing their volunteer involvement with associated health benefits.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nWorking with participants as co-authors helps to ensure the credibility of results in that there was agreement in the themes identified and the conclusions. A limitation of this study lies in the sampling method, as a convenience sample was used and there is only representation from one organisation in each of the four nations.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper combines existing knowledge about volunteer involvement of and for older adults.\n","PeriodicalId":508659,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","volume":"35 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-11-2022-0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to critically examine the effects of COVID-19 social discourses and policy decisions specifically on older adult volunteers in the UK, comparing the responses and their effects in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, providing perspectives on effects of policy changes designed to reduce risk of infection as a result of COVID-19, specifically on volunteer involvement of and for older adults, and understand, from the perspectives of volunteer managers, how COVID-19 restrictions had impacted older people’s volunteering and situating this within statutory public health policies. Design/methodology/approach The study uses a critical discourse approach to explore, compare and contrast accounts of volunteering of and for older people in policy, and then compare the discourses within policy documents with the discourses in personal accounts of volunteering in health and social care settings in the four nations of the UK. This paper is co-produced in collaboration with co-authors who have direct experience with volunteer involvement responses and their impact on older people. Findings The prevailing overall policy approach during the pandemic was that risk of morbidity and mortality to older people was too high to permit them to participate in volunteering activities. Disenfranchising of older people, as exemplified in volunteer involvement, was remarkably uniform across the four nations of the UK. However, the authors find that despite, rather than because of policy changes, older volunteers, as part of, or with the help of, volunteer involving organisations, are taking time to think and to reconsider their involvement and are renewing their volunteer involvement with associated health benefits. Research limitations/implications Working with participants as co-authors helps to ensure the credibility of results in that there was agreement in the themes identified and the conclusions. A limitation of this study lies in the sampling method, as a convenience sample was used and there is only representation from one organisation in each of the four nations. Originality/value The paper combines existing knowledge about volunteer involvement of and for older adults.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国四国在 COVID-19 公共卫生危机期间和之后影响老年志愿者的流行病决策
目的:本研究旨在批判性地研究 COVID-19 的社会论述和政策决定对英国老年人志愿者的影响, 比较英格兰、苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰的应对措施及其影响,提供旨在降低 COVID-19 感染风险的政策变化对老年人志愿者参与的影响的视角,并从志愿者管理者的角度了解 COVID-19 限制对老年人志愿服务的影响,并将其置于法定公共卫生政策中。设计/方法/途径:本研究采用批判性话语方法来探索、比较和对比政策中关于老年人志愿服务的描述,然后将政策文件中的话语与英国四个国家的医疗和社会护理机构中个人志愿服务描述中的话语进行比较。本文的共同作者在志愿者参与应对措施及其对老年人的影响方面有直接经验。研究结果大流行期间的总体政策方针是,老年人发病和死亡的风险太高,不允许他们参与志愿服务活动。在英国的四个国家中,老年人的权利被剥夺的情况非常一致,这在志愿者的参与中得到了体现。然而,作者发现,尽管政策发生了变化,但老年志愿者,作为志愿者参与组织的一部分,或在其帮助下,正在花时间思考和重新考虑他们的参与,并重新参与到志愿者活动中来,从而获得相关的健康益处。本研究的局限性在于抽样方法,因为采用的是方便抽样,而且四个国家中每个国家只有一个组织的代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pandemic policymaking affecting older adult volunteers during and after the COVID-19 public health crisis in the four nations of the UK Perceptions of older people about the use of cell phones in Argentina: a contribution from the gerontotechnological perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1