Transformations of Choice and Diversity in Education: Bildung from Wilhelm von Humboldt through John Stuart Mill to Milton Friedman

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH EDUCATIONAL THEORY Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1111/edth.12629
Todd Alan Price, Ruprecht Mattig
{"title":"Transformations of Choice and Diversity in Education: Bildung from Wilhelm von Humboldt through John Stuart Mill to Milton Friedman","authors":"Todd Alan Price,&nbsp;Ruprecht Mattig","doi":"10.1111/edth.12629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is fierce controversy in the United States over whether parents should be able to choose their children's schools and/or curriculum. To discuss the pedagogical arguments inherent in this question, Todd Alan Price and Ruprecht Mattig begin with the classical concept of <i>Bildung</i> as developed by Wilhelm von Humboldt around 1800. Next, they compare Humboldt's ideas with the ideas of John Stuart Mill and Milton Friedman, who stand in the tradition of liberal thought, as Mill was strongly influenced by Humboldt and Friedman, in turn, by Mill. Finally, they consider Friedman's role as a central figure in the school choice movement, and are thus able to trace a line of thought from Humboldt to actual controversies. Price and Mattig's analysis here shows that the liberalism of Humboldt, Mill, and Friedman revolves around diversity and choice in education. Moreover, it traces that in the process of translating, translocating, and transcontextualizing Humboldt's original thought through Mill to Friedman, the complexity of arguments about education and the role of parents and the state in a liberal society has been unduly reduced. The authors conclude the paper by proposing a principle for thinking about the relationship between different educational institutions in democracies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47134,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATIONAL THEORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATIONAL THEORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/edth.12629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is fierce controversy in the United States over whether parents should be able to choose their children's schools and/or curriculum. To discuss the pedagogical arguments inherent in this question, Todd Alan Price and Ruprecht Mattig begin with the classical concept of Bildung as developed by Wilhelm von Humboldt around 1800. Next, they compare Humboldt's ideas with the ideas of John Stuart Mill and Milton Friedman, who stand in the tradition of liberal thought, as Mill was strongly influenced by Humboldt and Friedman, in turn, by Mill. Finally, they consider Friedman's role as a central figure in the school choice movement, and are thus able to trace a line of thought from Humboldt to actual controversies. Price and Mattig's analysis here shows that the liberalism of Humboldt, Mill, and Friedman revolves around diversity and choice in education. Moreover, it traces that in the process of translating, translocating, and transcontextualizing Humboldt's original thought through Mill to Friedman, the complexity of arguments about education and the role of parents and the state in a liberal society has been unduly reduced. The authors conclude the paper by proposing a principle for thinking about the relationship between different educational institutions in democracies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育中的选择和多样性变革:从威廉-冯-洪堡(Wilhelm von Humboldt)到约翰-斯图亚特-米尔(John Stuart Mill)再到米尔顿-弗里德曼(Milton Friedman)的教育思想
在美国,家长是否应该为子女选择学校和/或课程的问题引起了激烈的争论。托德-艾伦-普赖斯(Todd Alan Price)和鲁普雷希特-马蒂格(Ruprecht Mattig)从威廉-冯-洪堡(Wilhelm von Humboldt)在 1800 年左右提出的 "教育"(Bildung)这一经典概念入手,讨论了这一问题所蕴含的教育学论点。接下来,他们将洪堡的思想与约翰-斯图亚特-密尔和米尔顿-弗里德曼的思想进行了比较,后者是自由主义思想传统的代表人物,密尔深受洪堡的影响,而弗里德曼则受到密尔的影响。最后,他们考虑了弗里德曼作为择校运动核心人物的作用,从而能够追溯从洪堡到实际争议的思想脉络。普莱斯和马蒂格的分析表明,洪堡、密尔和弗里德曼的自由主义都围绕着教育的多样性和选择展开。此外,他们还指出,在将洪堡特的原始思想通过密尔到弗里德曼进行翻译、转换和跨语境化的过程中,有关教育以及父母和国家在自由社会中的作用的论点的复杂性被不适当地削弱了。最后,作者提出了一个思考民主社会中不同教育机构之间关系的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EDUCATIONAL THEORY
EDUCATIONAL THEORY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The general purposes of Educational Theory are to foster the continuing development of educational theory and to encourage wide and effective discussion of theoretical problems within the educational profession. In order to achieve these purposes, the journal is devoted to publishing scholarly articles and studies in the foundations of education, and in related disciplines outside the field of education, which contribute to the advancement of educational theory. It is the policy of the sponsoring organizations to maintain the journal as an open channel of communication and as an open forum for discussion.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information “Society is the present of teaching”: Teaching as a Phenomenon in Levinas's Unedited Lecture Notes The Consequences of Peirce's Theory of Agential Ideas for Qualitative Research Case-Based Reasoning in Educational Ethics: Phronēsis and Epistemic Blinders Education for Robust Self-Respect in an Unjust World†
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1