Computed tomographic signs of the “possible” aspergillosis in dynamic observation of patients with COVID-19

Myo Tun Nay, Andrey L. Yudin, E. Yumatova, A. Vinokurov
{"title":"Computed tomographic signs of the “possible” aspergillosis in dynamic observation of patients with COVID-19","authors":"Myo Tun Nay, Andrey L. Yudin, E. Yumatova, A. Vinokurov","doi":"10.17816/clinpract624330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. Determination of CT signs of possible attachment of pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with COVID-19 during dynamic follow-up. \nMethods. The analysis of the case histories of 646 patients, in whom the results of CT monitoring of the lung condition for at least 2 months were obtained, was carried out. The total number of CT examinations is 5,279, the average number of studies per patient is 8. The main group consisted of 144 patients. The leading inclusion criterion was the presence of radiological signs atypical for COVID-19, suspected of fungal complications. \nResults. The analysis of the obtained images revealed the primary signs suspected of COVID–associated aspergillosis, which can be conditionally divided into typical bronchogenic and conditionally non-bronchogenic. Of the total number of patients in the main group, bronchogenic signs were noted in 56 patients (38.89%), and in 43 of them (76.79%), their transformation into signs characteristic of a fungal lesion was revealed. Relatively non-bronchogenic primary signs were identified in 88 patients (61.11%). In the process of studying the dynamics of signs suspected of COVID-associated aspergillosis, CT-signs typical of fungal lesions were obtained in 93 patients (64.58%). \"Consolidations\" as a primary sign and as a sign of transformation from foci were encountered in one time interval. This made it possible to collect all the signs of COVID-associated aspergillosis in a combined timing scheme. \nConclusion. The features of the clinical course of the disease in patients with COVID-19 do not allow us to confidently determine the attachment of a co-infection, such as aspergillosis. There are also difficulties in isolating the culture of the pathogen. Consequently, the role of computed tomography in identifying the semiotics of \"possible\" aspergillosis as a complication of COVID-19 is increasing.","PeriodicalId":508133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"137 48","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/clinpract624330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. Determination of CT signs of possible attachment of pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with COVID-19 during dynamic follow-up. Methods. The analysis of the case histories of 646 patients, in whom the results of CT monitoring of the lung condition for at least 2 months were obtained, was carried out. The total number of CT examinations is 5,279, the average number of studies per patient is 8. The main group consisted of 144 patients. The leading inclusion criterion was the presence of radiological signs atypical for COVID-19, suspected of fungal complications. Results. The analysis of the obtained images revealed the primary signs suspected of COVID–associated aspergillosis, which can be conditionally divided into typical bronchogenic and conditionally non-bronchogenic. Of the total number of patients in the main group, bronchogenic signs were noted in 56 patients (38.89%), and in 43 of them (76.79%), their transformation into signs characteristic of a fungal lesion was revealed. Relatively non-bronchogenic primary signs were identified in 88 patients (61.11%). In the process of studying the dynamics of signs suspected of COVID-associated aspergillosis, CT-signs typical of fungal lesions were obtained in 93 patients (64.58%). "Consolidations" as a primary sign and as a sign of transformation from foci were encountered in one time interval. This made it possible to collect all the signs of COVID-associated aspergillosis in a combined timing scheme. Conclusion. The features of the clinical course of the disease in patients with COVID-19 do not allow us to confidently determine the attachment of a co-infection, such as aspergillosis. There are also difficulties in isolating the culture of the pathogen. Consequently, the role of computed tomography in identifying the semiotics of "possible" aspergillosis as a complication of COVID-19 is increasing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在对 COVID-19 患者进行动态观察时发现 "可能的 "曲霉菌病的计算机断层扫描征象
目的在动态随访过程中确定 COVID-19 患者肺曲霉菌病可能附着的 CT 征象。方法对 646 例患者的病史进行分析,这些患者至少在 2 个月内接受过肺部 CT 监测。主要群体包括 144 名患者。主要纳入标准是出现 COVID-19 不典型的放射学征象,怀疑有真菌并发症。结果。对获得的图像进行分析后,发现了疑似 COVID 相关曲霉菌病的主要体征,可有条件地将其分为典型的支气管源性和有条件的非支气管源性。在主要组的所有患者中,56 名患者(38.89%)有支气管源性体征,其中 43 名患者(76.79%)的体征转变为真菌病变的特征性体征。在 88 名患者(61.11%)中发现了相对非支气管原发征象。在研究疑似 COVID 相关曲霉病症状的动态过程中,93 名患者(64.58%)出现了典型的真菌病变 CT 症状。在一个时间间隔内,"合并 "作为原发征象和病灶转化征象均有出现。这使得在一个综合时间计划中收集 COVID 相关曲霉病症的所有体征成为可能。结论根据 COVID-19 患者的临床病程特点,我们无法确定其是否与曲霉菌病等合并感染有关。病原体的培养分离也存在困难。因此,计算机断层扫描在确定 COVID-19 并发症 "可能 "为曲霉菌病的符号学方面的作用越来越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SOLITARY CUTANEOUS NEOPLASMS: ANALYSING THE UNCERTAIN BEHAVIOUR WITH THE AID OF HISTOPATHOLOGY Computed tomographic signs of the “possible” aspergillosis in dynamic observation of patients with COVID-19 Influence of reactive and proactive motor decision strategies on hand kinematic characteristics in stroke patients Informativeness of echocardiography in inferior myocardial infarction at different stages of observation Sirtuins in clinical trials of approaches to the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1