The challenge and path of constructing China's patent indirect infringement system

Zhongsen Zhang
{"title":"The challenge and path of constructing China's patent indirect infringement system","authors":"Zhongsen Zhang","doi":"10.54691/qr9yjk47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the \"comprehensive coverage principle\", the patent infringement should meet all the technical characteristics of the patent right to be established, but in practice, there is a situation, that is, to provide a patent component or implementation method of a patent step and provide assistance, or intentionally instil others to commit a specific infringement. If the perpetrator does not carry out the act controlled by the exclusive right of intellectual property, but helps or ABETS others to carry out the act controlled by the exclusive right of intellectual property, how to regulate the above behavior, there is a solution strategy of introducing the indirect infringement system of intellectual property in theory. The legitimate basis for the existence of indirect infringement system of intellectual property rights is to prevent intellectual property rights from being overhead and deep pocket rules. Based on the existing judicial interpretation, this paper summarizes the specific problems faced by indirect patent infringement in China through statistical analysis of relevant cases in practice, analyzes the rationality and feasibility of the construction of this system from the perspectives of jurisprudence and law and economics, and compares the relevant provisions of foreign countries. This paper provides suggestions and references for establishing indirect infringement clauses in the Patent Law in the future from the aspects of clarifying the nature and legislative mode of indirect infringement, the specific components of determining infringement, the liability of infringement and the causes of exemption.","PeriodicalId":476071,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"108 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54691/qr9yjk47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the "comprehensive coverage principle", the patent infringement should meet all the technical characteristics of the patent right to be established, but in practice, there is a situation, that is, to provide a patent component or implementation method of a patent step and provide assistance, or intentionally instil others to commit a specific infringement. If the perpetrator does not carry out the act controlled by the exclusive right of intellectual property, but helps or ABETS others to carry out the act controlled by the exclusive right of intellectual property, how to regulate the above behavior, there is a solution strategy of introducing the indirect infringement system of intellectual property in theory. The legitimate basis for the existence of indirect infringement system of intellectual property rights is to prevent intellectual property rights from being overhead and deep pocket rules. Based on the existing judicial interpretation, this paper summarizes the specific problems faced by indirect patent infringement in China through statistical analysis of relevant cases in practice, analyzes the rationality and feasibility of the construction of this system from the perspectives of jurisprudence and law and economics, and compares the relevant provisions of foreign countries. This paper provides suggestions and references for establishing indirect infringement clauses in the Patent Law in the future from the aspects of clarifying the nature and legislative mode of indirect infringement, the specific components of determining infringement, the liability of infringement and the causes of exemption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
构建中国专利间接侵权制度的挑战与路径
根据 "全面覆盖原则",专利侵权行为应当符合专利权所要成立的全部技术特征,但在实践中存在一种情况,即提供专利构件或者实施方法中的某一专利步骤并提供帮助,或者故意教唆他人实施具体侵权行为。如果行为人不实施知识产权专有权控制的行为,而是帮助或者ABETS他人实施知识产权专有权控制的行为,如何规制上述行为,理论上有引入知识产权间接侵权制度的解决策略。知识产权间接侵权制度存在的正当性基础是防止知识产权被架空和深套的规则。本文在现有司法解释的基础上,通过对实践中相关案例的统计分析,总结了我国专利间接侵权所面临的具体问题,从法理学和法律经济学的角度分析了该制度构建的合理性和可行性,并对比了国外的相关规定。本文从明确间接侵权的性质和立法模式、侵权判定的具体构成要件、侵权责任和免责事由等方面,为今后在专利法中设立间接侵权条款提供建议和参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vegetative Imagery and Emotional Expression: Symbolism and Heritage of Plant Imagery in Chinese Classical Poetry Research on the Transformation of Traditional Commercial Banks Based on the Perspective of Financial Technology Research on the mechanism and policies of polycentric agglomeration for promoting the upgrading of China's position in the global production value chain Research on the Coupled and Coordinated Development and Optimization Path of Low Carbon Economy and New Urbanization Based on the west, training high-quality innovative accounting talents in petroleum colleges and universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1