How does bias enter the employment interview? Identifying the riskiest applicant characteristics, interviewer characteristics, and sources of potentially biasing information

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Selection and Assessment Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1111/ijsa.12467
Timothy G. Wingate, Sabah Rasheed, Stephen D. Risavy, Chet Robie
{"title":"How does bias enter the employment interview? Identifying the riskiest applicant characteristics, interviewer characteristics, and sources of potentially biasing information","authors":"Timothy G. Wingate,&nbsp;Sabah Rasheed,&nbsp;Stephen D. Risavy,&nbsp;Chet Robie","doi":"10.1111/ijsa.12467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study examines the riskiest forms and sources of potential bias in the employment interview. A mixed methods survey focused on interviewers' attention to various potentially biasing applicant characteristics, how interviewers learn about such characteristics, the traits of interviewers who are sensitive to such characteristics, and how knowledge of such characteristics affects interviewers' opinions of applicants. Participants were 680 professional interviewers from the U.S., U.K., and Canada. High risks of bias were associated with six applicant characteristics (as targets of bias), three interviewer characteristics (as predisposing toward bias), and three sources of information in the interview process. Interviewers commonly rationalized their judgments in job-relevant terms. These results have implications for understanding and limiting the risk of common selection biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":51465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","volume":"32 3","pages":"399-420"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijsa.12467","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.12467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study examines the riskiest forms and sources of potential bias in the employment interview. A mixed methods survey focused on interviewers' attention to various potentially biasing applicant characteristics, how interviewers learn about such characteristics, the traits of interviewers who are sensitive to such characteristics, and how knowledge of such characteristics affects interviewers' opinions of applicants. Participants were 680 professional interviewers from the U.S., U.K., and Canada. High risks of bias were associated with six applicant characteristics (as targets of bias), three interviewer characteristics (as predisposing toward bias), and three sources of information in the interview process. Interviewers commonly rationalized their judgments in job-relevant terms. These results have implications for understanding and limiting the risk of common selection biases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
就业面试中的偏见是如何产生的?识别风险最大的申请人特征、面试官特征以及可能存在偏见的信息来源
本研究探讨了就业面试中最危险的潜在偏见形式和来源。一项混合方法调查的重点是面试官对各种可能产生偏见的求职者特征的关注、面试官如何了解这些特征、对这些特征敏感的面试官的特质,以及对这些特征的了解如何影响面试官对求职者的看法。参与者是来自美国、英国和加拿大的 680 名专业面试官。高偏见风险与申请人的六个特征(作为偏见的目标)、面试官的三个特征(容易产生偏见)以及面试过程中的三个信息来源有关。面试官通常从与工作相关的角度合理化他们的判断。这些结果对于理解和限制常见的选拔偏见风险具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
31.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Selection and Assessment publishes original articles related to all aspects of personnel selection, staffing, and assessment in organizations. Using an effective combination of academic research with professional-led best practice, IJSA aims to develop new knowledge and understanding in these important areas of work psychology and contemporary workforce management.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes Toward Cybervetting in Germany: Impact on Organizational Attractiveness Depends on Social Media Platform Why Participant Perceptions of Assessment Center Exercises Matter: Justice, Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Performance Are Games Always Fun and Fair? A Comparison of Reactions to Different Game-Based Assessments Comparing Proctored and Unproctored Cognitive Ability Testing in High-Stakes Personnel Selection A Meta-Analysis of Accent Bias in Employee Interviews: The Effects of Gender and Accent Stereotypes, Interview Modality, and Other Moderating Features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1