Agroecological innovation to scale livestock agriculture for positive economic, environmental, and social outcomes

Claudio Gratton, John Strauser, Nicholas Jordan, Randy Jackson
{"title":"Agroecological innovation to scale livestock agriculture for positive economic, environmental, and social outcomes","authors":"Claudio Gratton, John Strauser, Nicholas Jordan, Randy Jackson","doi":"10.1088/2976-601x/ad382f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Livestock agriculture must change to meet demand for food production while building soil, reducing flooding, retaining nutrients, enhancing biodiversity, and supporting thriving communities. Technological innovations, including those in digital and precision agriculture, are unlikely by themselves to create the magnitude and directionality of transformation of livestock production systems that are needed. We begin by comparing technological, ecological and social innovations in feedlot-finished and pasture-finished cattle production and propose that what is required is a more integrative “agroecological innovation” process that intentionally weaves these three forms of innovation to transition livestock agriculture to be genuinely regenerative and multifunctional. This integrated system emphasizes social innovations as essential components of the innovation system because of their capacity to address and influence the social context into which technological and ecological innovations occur. In particular, regional place-making can be especially useful as an interactive process of designing regional identities as people engage with one another and their environments to define landscape futures and the related social standards that normalize particular land management practices. Intentionally developing innovations can help communities engage in relational place-making processes to define desired outcomes for agricultural landscapes and develop ways to collaborate towards achieving them, including the creation of novel supply chains that support regenerative livestock systems. As social norms evolve through place-making they influence individual behaviors and agricultural practices on the ground and offer a pathway for more rapid scaling of regenerative practices in livestock agriculture. Regional place-making also can influence the ‘meta’ context of agricultural systems by engaging with public and private institutions responsible for management of natural resources, food systems, and the public good, further accelerating the scaling process. Emerging agroecological innovation systems for livestock agriculture must be designed and governed in ways that ensure responsible and diverse outcomes compatible with their social and ecological contexts, and with management approaches and technologies consistent with the values and goals of communities in a region.","PeriodicalId":517147,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research: Food Systems","volume":"11 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research: Food Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2976-601x/ad382f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Livestock agriculture must change to meet demand for food production while building soil, reducing flooding, retaining nutrients, enhancing biodiversity, and supporting thriving communities. Technological innovations, including those in digital and precision agriculture, are unlikely by themselves to create the magnitude and directionality of transformation of livestock production systems that are needed. We begin by comparing technological, ecological and social innovations in feedlot-finished and pasture-finished cattle production and propose that what is required is a more integrative “agroecological innovation” process that intentionally weaves these three forms of innovation to transition livestock agriculture to be genuinely regenerative and multifunctional. This integrated system emphasizes social innovations as essential components of the innovation system because of their capacity to address and influence the social context into which technological and ecological innovations occur. In particular, regional place-making can be especially useful as an interactive process of designing regional identities as people engage with one another and their environments to define landscape futures and the related social standards that normalize particular land management practices. Intentionally developing innovations can help communities engage in relational place-making processes to define desired outcomes for agricultural landscapes and develop ways to collaborate towards achieving them, including the creation of novel supply chains that support regenerative livestock systems. As social norms evolve through place-making they influence individual behaviors and agricultural practices on the ground and offer a pathway for more rapid scaling of regenerative practices in livestock agriculture. Regional place-making also can influence the ‘meta’ context of agricultural systems by engaging with public and private institutions responsible for management of natural resources, food systems, and the public good, further accelerating the scaling process. Emerging agroecological innovation systems for livestock agriculture must be designed and governed in ways that ensure responsible and diverse outcomes compatible with their social and ecological contexts, and with management approaches and technologies consistent with the values and goals of communities in a region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过农业生态创新扩大畜牧业规模,以取得积极的经济、环境和社会成果
畜牧业必须变革,以满足粮食生产的需求,同时建设土壤、减少洪涝、保持养分、提高生物多样性并支持繁荣的社区。技术创新,包括数字农业和精准农业领域的技术创新,其本身不太可能为畜牧业生产系统带来所需的变革幅度和方向。我们首先比较了饲养场成品牛和牧场成品牛生产中的技术、生态和社会创新,并提出需要一个更具综合性的 "农业生态创新 "过程,有意识地将这三种形式的创新结合起来,使畜牧业转型为真正的再生和多功能农业。这种综合系统强调社会创新是创新系统的重要组成部分,因为社会创新能够解决并影响技术和生态创新所处的社会环境。特别是,当人们彼此接触并在环境中确定景观未来以及使特定土地管理实践正常化的相关社会标准时,区域地方决策作为设计区域特征的互动过程就显得尤为有用。有意识地开发创新可以帮助社区参与到关系型地方建设过程中,以确定农业景观的预期成果,并制定实现这些成果的合作方式,包括创建支持再生畜牧系统的新型供应链。随着社会规范在地方建设过程中不断发展,它们会影响个人行为和当地的农业实践,并为畜牧业再生实践的更快推广提供途径。区域地方建设还可以通过与负责管理自然资源、粮食系统和公益事业的公共和私营机构合作,影响农业系统的 "元 "环境,从而进一步加快推广进程。新兴的畜牧业生态农业创新系统的设计和管理方式必须确保负责任和多样化的成果与其社会和生态环境相适应,并确保管理方法和技术与区域内社区的价值观和目标相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Estimating methane emissions from manure: a suitable case for treatment? Impacts of sand and dust storms on food production Supporting farmers in coping with water extremes: Aligning farmer needs and advisor confidence, skills, and expertise Solar irrigation potential in Sub-Saharan Africa: A crop-specific techno-economic analysis Groundwater irrigation is critical for adapting wheat systems to warming temperatures in the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1