A framework on interplay of knowledge types and dimensions in pandemics – Example of COVID-19

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Knowledge and Process Management Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1002/kpm.1775
Nakul Parameswar, Krishna Venkitachalam
{"title":"A framework on interplay of knowledge types and dimensions in pandemics – Example of COVID-19","authors":"Nakul Parameswar,&nbsp;Krishna Venkitachalam","doi":"10.1002/kpm.1775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent literature has documented numerous knowledge management (KM) policy frameworks and models utilised for managing pandemics such as COVID-19. Perhaps the major focus of existing scholarly work is on the role and relevance of healthcare KM in the COVID-19 crisis compared to the understanding of healthcare knowledge dimensions and knowledge types in pandemic management and control. Considering the complexities of COVID-19, we attempt to address a literature gap in the management knowledge of pandemics as the study problem in this paper. The paper proposes a framework to analyse the interplay between the dimensions and knowledge types and its application benefits using the example of COVID-19 management in the state of Kerala. Considering the disparities in how the pandemic was managed globally, we use the Kerala case to illuminate the different interactions between the three types and four dimensions of knowledge for pandemic management. Future studies may explore the extension and testing of the proposed interplay framework in other contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46428,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Process Management","volume":"31 3","pages":"221-229"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Process Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent literature has documented numerous knowledge management (KM) policy frameworks and models utilised for managing pandemics such as COVID-19. Perhaps the major focus of existing scholarly work is on the role and relevance of healthcare KM in the COVID-19 crisis compared to the understanding of healthcare knowledge dimensions and knowledge types in pandemic management and control. Considering the complexities of COVID-19, we attempt to address a literature gap in the management knowledge of pandemics as the study problem in this paper. The paper proposes a framework to analyse the interplay between the dimensions and knowledge types and its application benefits using the example of COVID-19 management in the state of Kerala. Considering the disparities in how the pandemic was managed globally, we use the Kerala case to illuminate the different interactions between the three types and four dimensions of knowledge for pandemic management. Future studies may explore the extension and testing of the proposed interplay framework in other contexts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行病中知识类型和维度相互作用的框架--以 COVID-19 为例
最近的文献记录了许多用于管理 COVID-19 等流行病的知识管理(KM)政策框架和模式。与了解大流行病管理和控制中的医疗保健知识维度和知识类型相比,现有学术著作的主要重点可能是医疗保健知识管理在 COVID-19 危机中的作用和相关性。考虑到 COVID-19 的复杂性,我们试图将解决流行病管理知识方面的文献空白作为本文的研究问题。本文以喀拉拉邦的 COVID-19 管理为例,提出了一个分析各维度和知识类型之间相互作用及其应用效益的框架。考虑到全球管理大流行病的方式存在差异,我们利用喀拉拉邦的案例来阐明大流行病管理知识的三种类型和四个维度之间的不同相互作用。未来的研究可能会探索在其他情况下扩展和检验拟议的相互作用框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Process Management aims to provide essential information to executives responsible for driving performance improvement in their business or for introducing new ideas to business through thought leadership. The journal meets executives" needs for practical information on the lessons learned from other organizations in the areas of: - knowledge management - organizational learning - core competences - process management
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Impact of Knowledge Management Process on Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Technological Innovation How Does Green Knowledge Sharing Improve Sustainable Business Performance? Intertwining Between Online Retailer's Trustworthiness Attributes and Consumer's Purchase Intentions: A Knowledge Management Perspective in Response to COVID-19 Analyzing the Impact of the Knowledge Management Process on the Banking Sector Performance: By Using the Partial Least Square Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1