An Analysis of Agency in Thai Education Policy: A Corpus- Driven Approach

Natakorn Satienchayakorn, P. Jimarkon
{"title":"An Analysis of Agency in Thai Education Policy: A Corpus- Driven Approach","authors":"Natakorn Satienchayakorn, P. Jimarkon","doi":"10.61508/refl.v31i1.271945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most important skill in modern education is critical thinking and its necessary elements are agencies and voices which are force, ability, or power to make decisions or changes. Despite numerous efforts to increase Thai students’ critical thinking skills, their ability to construct social and academic arguments is still far too weak. In addition, while these efforts mainly focus on students’ critical thinking skills, little attention has been given to other education stakeholders such as education, institutions, schools, and teachers which potentially provide room for teachers and students to be critical. In this study, we investigated the ideological indexation of education stakeholders in a series of Thai educational policies (TEPs) years 2016-2018 from the Ministry of Education, Thailand. In TEPs, we utilized the corpus linguistic frequency function to locate the possible stakeholders and applied the framework of syntactic corpus analysis for agency identification (FO-SCAAI) to lexically elicit their agencies and voices which are important elements in modern education. The findings revealed an understanding of the representation of varying degrees of education stakeholders’ agencies in TEPs. The implications of this study will lead to the realization that education stakeholders lack agencies and voices. We hope that upon realizing their lack of agency, the involved parties will make changes by providing more agencies to education stakeholders through modern education in Thai education policies.","PeriodicalId":508660,"journal":{"name":"rEFLections","volume":"3 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"rEFLections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v31i1.271945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most important skill in modern education is critical thinking and its necessary elements are agencies and voices which are force, ability, or power to make decisions or changes. Despite numerous efforts to increase Thai students’ critical thinking skills, their ability to construct social and academic arguments is still far too weak. In addition, while these efforts mainly focus on students’ critical thinking skills, little attention has been given to other education stakeholders such as education, institutions, schools, and teachers which potentially provide room for teachers and students to be critical. In this study, we investigated the ideological indexation of education stakeholders in a series of Thai educational policies (TEPs) years 2016-2018 from the Ministry of Education, Thailand. In TEPs, we utilized the corpus linguistic frequency function to locate the possible stakeholders and applied the framework of syntactic corpus analysis for agency identification (FO-SCAAI) to lexically elicit their agencies and voices which are important elements in modern education. The findings revealed an understanding of the representation of varying degrees of education stakeholders’ agencies in TEPs. The implications of this study will lead to the realization that education stakeholders lack agencies and voices. We hope that upon realizing their lack of agency, the involved parties will make changes by providing more agencies to education stakeholders through modern education in Thai education policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰国教育政策中的代理分析:语料库驱动法
现代教育中最重要的技能是批判性思维,其必要元素是机构和声音,它们是做出决定或改变的力量、能力或权力。尽管为提高泰国学生的批判性思维能力做出了许多努力,但他们构建社会和学术论据的能力仍然太弱。此外,虽然这些努力主要集中在学生的批判性思维能力上,但却很少关注其他教育利益相关者,如教育、机构、学校和教师,因为这些利益相关者有可能为教师和学生提供批判的空间。在本研究中,我们调查了泰国教育部 2016-2018 年一系列泰国教育政策(TEPs)中教育利益相关者的意识形态指标。在泰国教育政策中,我们利用语料库语频函数定位可能的利益相关者,并应用句法语料库分析框架进行机构识别(FO-SCAAI),从词法上引出他们的机构和声音,这些机构和声音是现代教育中的重要元素。研究结果揭示了教育利益相关者机构在技术教育计划中不同程度的代表性。本研究的意义在于使人们认识到教育利益相关者缺乏机构和声音。我们希望,在意识到他们缺乏代理权后,相关各方将做出改变,通过泰国教育政策中的现代教育为教育利益相关者提供更多代理权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges in Implementing Extensive Reading in Thailand The Effects of Derivational Suffix Instruction on English Vocabulary Knowledge in Thai High School Learners Factor Analysis of Students’ Perceived Needs Prior to Studies Abroad Blended Learning and its Impact on English Reading Comprehension among Thai Vocational Students An Analysis of Agency in Thai Education Policy: A Corpus- Driven Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1