Within‐group apologies can restore a sense of justice more for non‐victimized observers than for victims

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Asian Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1111/ajsp.12613
Yeongjin Yu, Taeyun Jung
{"title":"Within‐group apologies can restore a sense of justice more for non‐victimized observers than for victims","authors":"Yeongjin Yu, Taeyun Jung","doi":"10.1111/ajsp.12613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within‐group apologies are effective for governments to address injustices, but they often hesitate due to public reception concerns. With justice theory as the starting point, this study investigated the psychological effects of within‐group apologies, excuses and silence between the empathetic group towards victims' experiences (i.e. victim‐empathic group) and the observers (Study 1) and between the actual victims and the observers (Study 2). Findings indicate that within‐group apologies restore justice and social engagement for all participants, while excuses and silence are ineffective. Victims' justice restoration was notably weaker than observers when encountering the apology (Study 2), while the victim‐empathic group had similar justice restoration as observers (Study 1). Thus, within‐group apologies are more effective at restoring a sense of justice for observers than victims.","PeriodicalId":47394,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12613","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within‐group apologies are effective for governments to address injustices, but they often hesitate due to public reception concerns. With justice theory as the starting point, this study investigated the psychological effects of within‐group apologies, excuses and silence between the empathetic group towards victims' experiences (i.e. victim‐empathic group) and the observers (Study 1) and between the actual victims and the observers (Study 2). Findings indicate that within‐group apologies restore justice and social engagement for all participants, while excuses and silence are ineffective. Victims' justice restoration was notably weaker than observers when encountering the apology (Study 2), while the victim‐empathic group had similar justice restoration as observers (Study 1). Thus, within‐group apologies are more effective at restoring a sense of justice for observers than victims.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
群内道歉对非受害者的观察者比对受害者更能恢复正义感
群内道歉对于政府解决不公正问题是有效的,但政府往往会因为公众接受度的问题而犹豫不决。本研究以正义理论为出发点,调查了对受害者经历感同身受的群体(即受害者感同身受群体)与观察者之间(研究 1)以及实际受害者与观察者之间(研究 2)的群体内道歉、推脱和沉默的心理效应。研究结果表明,组内道歉可以恢复所有参与者的正义感和社会参与,而借口和沉默则无效。在遇到道歉时,受害者的正义恢复能力明显弱于观察者(研究 2),而受害者同情组的正义恢复能力与观察者相似(研究 1)。因此,组内道歉在恢复观察者的正义感方面比受害者更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Social Psychology publishes empirical papers and major reviews on any topic in social psychology and personality, and on topics in other areas of basic and applied psychology that highlight the role of social psychological concepts and theories. The journal coverage also includes all aspects of social processes such as development, cognition, emotions, personality, health and well-being, in the sociocultural context of organisations, schools, communities, social networks, and virtual groups. The journal encourages interdisciplinary integration with social sciences, life sciences, engineering sciences, and the humanities. The journal positively encourages submissions with Asian content and/or Asian authors but welcomes high-quality submissions from any part of the world.
期刊最新文献
Internationalising imperatives and decolonising aspirations: Navigating social psychology teaching in Asia Past, present and future: Colonial comparative victimhood hinders reconciliation with Chinese Indonesians through prejudice among natives Embodied spatial metaphor of cultural concept from the perspective of cultural tightness–looseness: Cultural compatibility concept is closer to the body From marital conflict to life satisfaction: How basic psychological need satisfaction operates—A dyadic analysis study Hierarchical drift‐diffusion modelling uncovers differences of valenced self‐evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1