Comparison Curriculum Analysis between Indonesian KTSP 2006 and 2013 Curriculums

Alvin Barata, Lilis Patria, Shilvani Shilvani
{"title":"Comparison Curriculum Analysis between Indonesian KTSP 2006 and 2013 Curriculums","authors":"Alvin Barata, Lilis Patria, Shilvani Shilvani","doi":"10.26418/icote.v4i1.78270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Education has become a part of human life. It is given to individuals differently depending on where the educational activities take place. In order to maintain the consistency of education in certain areas, there is a need for a curriculum that defines the materials and learning standards that must be taught and achieved in educational institutions based on the customs of each area around the world. One method of curriculum implementation is through textbooks. They are tools in which curriculum materials and standards are implemented to support teaching and learning activities. Textbooks always have problems with the content related to the implemented curriculum. There is a need for evaluation to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of textbooks. This study examines the existing implemented curriculum with the textbook contents. Two textbooks, \"Bahasa Inggris\" based on Indonesian Curriculum 2013 and \"Developing English Competences\" based on Indonesian KTSP 2006 curriculum, are used for assessment and evaluation. Qualitative method called document analysis is used by implementing McGrath's theory to evaluate textbooks. The results are the difference and validity between the textbooks contents and both the 2013 and 2006 KTSP curriculum. Both are considered suitable, but with some difficulties in certain degrees in teaching and learning activities.","PeriodicalId":155006,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings International Conference on Teaching and Education (ICoTE)","volume":"19 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings International Conference on Teaching and Education (ICoTE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26418/icote.v4i1.78270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Education has become a part of human life. It is given to individuals differently depending on where the educational activities take place. In order to maintain the consistency of education in certain areas, there is a need for a curriculum that defines the materials and learning standards that must be taught and achieved in educational institutions based on the customs of each area around the world. One method of curriculum implementation is through textbooks. They are tools in which curriculum materials and standards are implemented to support teaching and learning activities. Textbooks always have problems with the content related to the implemented curriculum. There is a need for evaluation to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of textbooks. This study examines the existing implemented curriculum with the textbook contents. Two textbooks, "Bahasa Inggris" based on Indonesian Curriculum 2013 and "Developing English Competences" based on Indonesian KTSP 2006 curriculum, are used for assessment and evaluation. Qualitative method called document analysis is used by implementing McGrath's theory to evaluate textbooks. The results are the difference and validity between the textbooks contents and both the 2013 and 2006 KTSP curriculum. Both are considered suitable, but with some difficulties in certain degrees in teaching and learning activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚 KTSP 2006 和 2013 年课程对比分析
教育已成为人类生活的一部分。根据教育活动地点的不同,个人接受教育的情况也不同。为了保持某些地区教育的一致性,有必要根据世界各地的风俗习惯制定课程,确定教育机构必须教授和达到的教材和学习标准。教科书是实施课程的方法之一。教科书是实施课程材料和标准的工具,用于支持教学活动。教科书总是存在与实施课程有关的内容问题。有必要对教科书的效果和效率进行评估。本研究结合教科书内容对现有的已实施课程进行了研究。两本教科书,即基于 2013 年印尼课程的《印尼语》和基于 2006 年印尼 KTSP 课程的《发展英语能力》,被用来进行评估和评价。在评估教科书时,采用了名为 "文件分析 "的定性方法,并运用了麦格拉斯的理论。结果显示了教科书内容与 2013 年和 2006 年 KTSP 课程之间的差异和有效性。两者都被认为是合适的,但在教学活动中都存在一定程度的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Content Analysis of Grammar Activities in 'Wider World 2' Student’s Book by Pearson for Grade Seven Students Developing Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) Materials for ESL Learners A Descriptive Study of the Students' Problems in English Reading Comprehension of X grade at SMAS AMKUR Sungai Pinyuh in the Academic year 2021/2022 Evaluation of Cultural Content on English Module of 9th Grade Students Published by Indonesia’s Government during the Covid-19 Pandemic An Analysis of Project Based Learning Application in Curriculum 2013
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1