Community Renewable Energy Ecologies (CREE): Rhizomatic renewable energy development and experimental–experiential emancipation

Zoi Christina Siamanta
{"title":"Community Renewable Energy Ecologies (CREE): Rhizomatic renewable energy development and experimental–experiential emancipation","authors":"Zoi Christina Siamanta","doi":"10.1177/19427786241240790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The embodied multispecies injustices of the so-called renewable energy development foreground the vital need for radically different forms of forming renewable energy. However, very few specific alternative approaches have been proposed in literature, in line with a deficit of post-critical or post-humanist research on ‘renewable energy’ within, and outside, human geography. This paper concerns, delves deeper in, expands and refines an approach for post-capitalist renewable energy development published, called Community Renewable Energy Ecologies (CREE). It advances an ontological reframing of ‘renewable energy’, arguing that renewable energies need to be rethought as affective spatiotemporal relations between humans and the rest of the web of life that affirm and enable difference, autonomy and more flourishing socio-natural assemblages. Also, inspired by Deleuze and Guattari, it sketches rhizomatic renewable energy development for CREE, focusing in more detail on, amongst other things, relationships, alliances, the state's role, learning, scaling out and politics. Rhizomatic renewable energy development consists in a rhizome-like form of forming renewable energies and new socio-ecological arrangements, facilitating deterritorialization in existing socio-natural assemblages and their reterritorialization in new forms. It is constituted by three key features: rhizomatic alliances, minoritarian becomings and emancipatory experimental ethico-politics and rhizomatic learning. Community Renewable Energy Ecologies are re-envisioned as nomadic multiplicities involved in open and immanent post-capitalist experiments of rhizomatic renewable energy development able to nourish emancipation and broader socio-ecological transformation. Finally, the paper invites discussion and debate for imagining alternative renewable energy development futures beyond capitalism and how to facilitate them, in the spirit of ‘staying with the trouble’.","PeriodicalId":507268,"journal":{"name":"Human Geography","volume":"98 37","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786241240790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The embodied multispecies injustices of the so-called renewable energy development foreground the vital need for radically different forms of forming renewable energy. However, very few specific alternative approaches have been proposed in literature, in line with a deficit of post-critical or post-humanist research on ‘renewable energy’ within, and outside, human geography. This paper concerns, delves deeper in, expands and refines an approach for post-capitalist renewable energy development published, called Community Renewable Energy Ecologies (CREE). It advances an ontological reframing of ‘renewable energy’, arguing that renewable energies need to be rethought as affective spatiotemporal relations between humans and the rest of the web of life that affirm and enable difference, autonomy and more flourishing socio-natural assemblages. Also, inspired by Deleuze and Guattari, it sketches rhizomatic renewable energy development for CREE, focusing in more detail on, amongst other things, relationships, alliances, the state's role, learning, scaling out and politics. Rhizomatic renewable energy development consists in a rhizome-like form of forming renewable energies and new socio-ecological arrangements, facilitating deterritorialization in existing socio-natural assemblages and their reterritorialization in new forms. It is constituted by three key features: rhizomatic alliances, minoritarian becomings and emancipatory experimental ethico-politics and rhizomatic learning. Community Renewable Energy Ecologies are re-envisioned as nomadic multiplicities involved in open and immanent post-capitalist experiments of rhizomatic renewable energy development able to nourish emancipation and broader socio-ecological transformation. Finally, the paper invites discussion and debate for imagining alternative renewable energy development futures beyond capitalism and how to facilitate them, in the spirit of ‘staying with the trouble’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区可再生能源生态(CREE):Rhizomatic 可再生能源开发和实验-体验式解放
所谓的可再生能源发展所体现的多物种不公正现象,突出表明了以截然不同的形式形成可再生能源的极端必要性。然而,与人文地理学内外对 "可再生能源 "的后批判或后人文主义研究的不足相一致,文献中很少提出具体的替代方法。本文关注、深入探讨、扩展并完善了一种后资本主义可再生能源开发方法,即社区可再生能源生态学(CREE)。它从本体论的角度重新构建了 "可再生能源",认为需要将可再生能源重新视为人类与生命之网其他部分之间的情感时空关系,这种关系能够肯定并促成差异、自主性和更加繁荣的社会-自然组合。此外,受德勒兹和瓜塔里的启发,本报告还为 CREE 勾画了根瘤式可再生能源发展的图景,更详细地关注了关系、联盟、国家的作用、学习、扩大规模和政治等问题。根瘤式可再生能源开发包括以根瘤的形式形成可再生能源和新的社会生态安排,促进现有社会-自然组合的去领土化和新形式的再领土化。它由三个主要特征构成:根瘤联盟、小众化、解放性实验伦理政治学和根瘤学习。社区可再生能源生态被重新设想为游牧多元性,参与开放和内在的后资本主义根瘤式可再生能源发展实验,能够滋养解放和更广泛的社会生态变革。最后,本文邀请大家本着 "与困难共存 "的精神,就如何想象资本主义之外的可再生能源发展前景以及如何促进这些前景展开讨论和辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial capitalism going to heaven the ultrathin ultraluxury supertalls of Manhattan Miner threat: Premature death to prefigurative politics for unearthing solar-grade silica Capitalist urbanization in the post-neoliberal and de-globalizing world economy: A minor critical engagement with VIP-Urbanism literature “Airport city” or “VIP” urbanism? Questioning the market-led land development strategies of airports The unsustainable life of British Universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1