RIGHT TO A FAIR-TRIAL WHEN APPLYING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE - LESSONS AND EXPERIENCES FOR VIETNAM

Nguyen Thi Thu Trang, Nguyen Hoai Linh, Nguyen Thi Cam Hoang, Pham Vo Tuan Kiet, Luu Thi Ngoc Loan, Nguyen Thi Hoai Phuc
{"title":"RIGHT TO A FAIR-TRIAL WHEN APPLYING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE - LESSONS AND EXPERIENCES FOR VIETNAM","authors":"Nguyen Thi Thu Trang, Nguyen Hoai Linh, Nguyen Thi Cam Hoang, Pham Vo Tuan Kiet, Luu Thi Ngoc Loan, Nguyen Thi Hoai Phuc","doi":"10.55908/sdgs.v12i3.601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The article studies the application of AI in the field of criminal justice. Since then, the article evaluates the feasibility and offers solutions and recommendations to ensure the right to a fair trial when applying AI to criminal justice in Vietnam.\n \nMethods: To conduct research on the application of AI in criminal justice in Vietnam to ensure the right to a fair trial, the authors used traditional research methods of social science and legal science methods of analysis, synthesis, and case study to achieve the objective of the research.\n \nResults: Artificial intelligence (AI) and its application, in general, are a matter of concern in social life in general and law in particular. The application of artificial intelligence in criminal justice to digitize the judicial field is being applied in many parts of the world such as the United States and European countries. Based on the theory of the order of justice before the law, the authors analyzed and assessed the impacts and effects of AI and found that the application of AI in criminal justice can negatively affect the right to a fair trial.\n \nConclusion: Through this study, we propose the following contents to effectively apply AI in Vietnamese criminal justice as follows: (i) The principle of the right to a fair trial must be respected when applying AI in decision-making; (ii) Enhancing the role of investigators, prosecutors, and judges in AI predictive decision-making; (iii) Building a database and AI system development agency in Vietnam; (iv) Upgrading technology infrastructure and databases at Criminal Justice Agencies; (v) Developing communication and training plan on technology and human rights content; (vi) Integrating the right to a fair trial systematically into every stage of the design, development, implementation, and ongoing monitoring of products, services, and systems using AI; (vi) Establishing the Department of AI Development and Use. In the future, the completion of the legal framework to ensure human rights under the influence of AI and legal issues on AI are issues that need to be further studied in Vietnam.","PeriodicalId":510463,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Sustainable Development","volume":"91 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i3.601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The article studies the application of AI in the field of criminal justice. Since then, the article evaluates the feasibility and offers solutions and recommendations to ensure the right to a fair trial when applying AI to criminal justice in Vietnam.   Methods: To conduct research on the application of AI in criminal justice in Vietnam to ensure the right to a fair trial, the authors used traditional research methods of social science and legal science methods of analysis, synthesis, and case study to achieve the objective of the research.   Results: Artificial intelligence (AI) and its application, in general, are a matter of concern in social life in general and law in particular. The application of artificial intelligence in criminal justice to digitize the judicial field is being applied in many parts of the world such as the United States and European countries. Based on the theory of the order of justice before the law, the authors analyzed and assessed the impacts and effects of AI and found that the application of AI in criminal justice can negatively affect the right to a fair trial.   Conclusion: Through this study, we propose the following contents to effectively apply AI in Vietnamese criminal justice as follows: (i) The principle of the right to a fair trial must be respected when applying AI in decision-making; (ii) Enhancing the role of investigators, prosecutors, and judges in AI predictive decision-making; (iii) Building a database and AI system development agency in Vietnam; (iv) Upgrading technology infrastructure and databases at Criminal Justice Agencies; (v) Developing communication and training plan on technology and human rights content; (vi) Integrating the right to a fair trial systematically into every stage of the design, development, implementation, and ongoing monitoring of products, services, and systems using AI; (vi) Establishing the Department of AI Development and Use. In the future, the completion of the legal framework to ensure human rights under the influence of AI and legal issues on AI are issues that need to be further studied in Vietnam.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在刑事司法中应用人工智能时的公平审判权--越南的教训和经验
目的:本文研究了人工智能在刑事司法领域的应用。此后,文章评估了在越南将人工智能应用于刑事司法的可行性,并提出了确保公平审判权的解决方案和建议。研究方法为了对人工智能在越南刑事司法中的应用进行研究,以确保公平审判权,作者采用了社会科学的传统研究方法和法律科学的分析、综合和案例研究方法来实现研究目标。研究结果人工智能(AI)及其应用是社会生活尤其是法律领域普遍关注的问题。人工智能在刑事司法领域的应用,实现了司法领域的数字化,在美国和欧洲国家等世界许多地方都得到了应用。作者基于法律面前的正义秩序理论,对人工智能的影响和作用进行了分析和评估,发现人工智能在刑事司法中的应用会对公平审判权产生负面影响。结论:通过本研究,我们提出在越南刑事司法中有效应用人工智能的内容如下:(i) 在决策中应用人工智能时必须尊重公平审判权原则;(ii) 加强调查员、检察官和法官在人工智能预测决策中的作用;(iii) 在越南建立数据库和人工智能系统开发机构;(iv) 升级刑事司法机构的技术基础设施和数据库;(五) 制定关于技术和人权内容的交流和培训计划;(六) 将公平审判权系统地纳入使用人工智能的产品、服务和系统的设计、开发、实施和持续监测的每个阶段;(七) 建立人工智能开发和使用部。今后,越南需要进一步研究在人工智能影响下完成确保人权的法律框架以及人工智能的法律问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ABOUT ONE INNOVATION NUMERICAL METHOD FOR SOLVING ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF HIGHER ORDERS SOUTH AFRICAN MIGRATION POLICY ON THE ZIMBABWEAN SPECIAL PERMIT RENEWAL EXPERIENCE: DIPLOMACY OF WEAPONS FOR POWER METHODS OF STATE ACQUISITION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY UNDER LAW NO. 23-17 AND ITS IMPACT ON THE PRINCIPLES OF LEGAL SECURITY CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGE BETWEEN SHARIA, LAW AND MEDICINE PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1