Unravelling Power of the Unseen: Towards an Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Generative AI Regulation

Le Cheng, Xiuli Liu
{"title":"Unravelling Power of the Unseen: Towards an Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Generative AI Regulation","authors":"Le Cheng, Xiuli Liu","doi":"10.1515/ijdlg-2024-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The regulations of generative AI, typified by ChatGPT and Sora, have become one of the most influential alternative technological imaginaries. Developed by states and civil society groups, such regulations are triggering a broad range of social actors seeking to nominalize the AI-related behavior. Against this backdrop, this study starts with interrogating the semiotic character of generative AI. Do these regulations support the AI futures, or do they involve a mere change in the social actors who benefit from the technological status quo? To answer this question, this study examines the rhetoric and realization of AI regulations by the European Union and the United States. The findings reveal a degree of AI regulatory alignment between the European Union and the United States, but these two jurisdictions also highlight and predict some structural challenges. Drawing upon the concept of panopticism by Foucault, the study explores the foundational origins of challenges by dissecting the (in)visibility of AI power. It underscores the necessity of regulating the power of the unseen and proposes a synthetic generative AI regulatory framework. We finally conclude that the integrity of sociosemiotics and panopticism provides a productive and paramount framework for understanding the powerful new capacities of AI-related regulations.","PeriodicalId":517562,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Digital Law and Governance","volume":"118 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Digital Law and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdlg-2024-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The regulations of generative AI, typified by ChatGPT and Sora, have become one of the most influential alternative technological imaginaries. Developed by states and civil society groups, such regulations are triggering a broad range of social actors seeking to nominalize the AI-related behavior. Against this backdrop, this study starts with interrogating the semiotic character of generative AI. Do these regulations support the AI futures, or do they involve a mere change in the social actors who benefit from the technological status quo? To answer this question, this study examines the rhetoric and realization of AI regulations by the European Union and the United States. The findings reveal a degree of AI regulatory alignment between the European Union and the United States, but these two jurisdictions also highlight and predict some structural challenges. Drawing upon the concept of panopticism by Foucault, the study explores the foundational origins of challenges by dissecting the (in)visibility of AI power. It underscores the necessity of regulating the power of the unseen and proposes a synthetic generative AI regulatory framework. We finally conclude that the integrity of sociosemiotics and panopticism provides a productive and paramount framework for understanding the powerful new capacities of AI-related regulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读看不见的力量:迈向生成式人工智能监管的跨学科综合体
以 ChatGPT 和 Sora 为代表的生成式人工智能法规已成为最具影响力的另类技术想象之一。这些法规由国家和民间团体制定,引发了广泛的社会行动者寻求将人工智能相关行为名义化。在此背景下,本研究首先对生成式人工智能的符号学特征进行了探究。这些法规是支持人工智能的未来,还是仅仅改变了从技术现状中获益的社会参与者?为了回答这个问题,本研究考察了欧盟和美国的人工智能法规的言辞和实现情况。研究结果表明,欧盟和美国的人工智能法规在一定程度上是一致的,但这两个司法管辖区也强调并预测了一些结构性挑战。本研究借鉴福柯的泛视角概念,通过剖析人工智能权力的(不)可见性,探讨了挑战的根本起源。研究强调了对不可见权力进行监管的必要性,并提出了一个人工智能合成生成监管框架。最后,我们得出结论,社会符号学和泛视主义的完整性为理解人工智能相关监管的强大新能力提供了一个富有成效的重要框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biometric Technology at the Borders of Citizenship: Identifying Technical Standards for Introducer-Based Remote Onboarding in Global Contexts of Statelessness, Nomadism, Displacement, and Refuge Enhancing Cybersecurity in Climate Technology Transfer: The Interaction of Environmental Law with Digital Security Unravelling Power of the Unseen: Towards an Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Generative AI Regulation Rhizomatic Healthcare: The Digital Transformation of France’s Medical Landscape The Global Institutional Governance of AI: A Four-Dimensional Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1