Analysis of Sinus Variability in a Group of Cameroonian Athletes

Deugoue F. Y. Djientcheu, M. Azabji-Kenfack, P. M. Kameni, D. C. Bilanda, Membe U. Femoe, M. C. Ngoungoure, P. Kamtchouing, D. Dzeufiet
{"title":"Analysis of Sinus Variability in a Group of Cameroonian Athletes","authors":"Deugoue F. Y. Djientcheu, M. Azabji-Kenfack, P. M. Kameni, D. C. Bilanda, Membe U. Femoe, M. C. Ngoungoure, P. Kamtchouing, D. Dzeufiet","doi":"10.1155/2024/1752677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is a useful method for assessing the heart's ability to adapt to endogenous and exogenous loads. Data from African population on HRV are scarce and even more so in sports populations. This study aimed to compare cardiac autonomic modulation response in Cameroonian athletes and sedentary. Methodology. We conducted a prospective and analytical study in sports teams in the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon. The participants in our study were divided in three groups; people who practiced little or no sporting activity (sedentary as group 1) or who were regularly physically active as part of a sports team (footballers or handballers as second and third groups). They had to be aged 18 or over and have given their informed consent. Heart rate (HR) was continuously recorded at rest for ten minutes and then transferred to a computer equipped with Kubios HRV Standard software for analysis. Means ± mean standard errors were compared using the one-way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey's post-test. The significance threshold was set at 0.05. Results Of the 60 people selected to participate to our study, 75.0% were sportsmen (40.0% handball players and 35.0% footballers). The resting HR of sedentary people was higher (p < 0.001) than that of footballers and handball players. The SDNN, RMSSD, and pNN50 of sedentary people (16.22 ± 1.04; 9.97 ± 0.46; and 0.16 ± 0.06) were lower than those of footballers (30.13 ± 2.93; 20.61 ± 2.46; and 2.99 ± 0.63, with p < 0.001) and handball players (29.00 ± 1.86; 16.44 ± 1.16; and 2.15 ± 0.38, with p < 0.001 and p < 0.05 respectively). Absolute and relative very-low-frequency (VLF) power, absolute low and high-frequency (LF and HF) power, as well as total power (TP) were lower in sedentary people (3.66 ± 0.08 and 16.21 ± 0.64; 5.04 ± 0.15 and 2.50 ± 0.16 and 246.40 ± 18.04) compared to footballers (5.09 ± 0.24 and 26.87 ± 1.76; 5.85 ± 0.32 and 3.92 ± 0.22 and 836.10 ± 103.70, with p < 0.001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001) and handball players (4.86 ± 0.16 and 30.82 ± 2.67; 6.03 ± 0.19 and 3.46 ± 0.16 and 927.30 ± 94.12, with p < 0.001, p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001). The LF/HF ratio was 12.1% and 20.1% lower in sedentary people (7.55 ± 0.58) compared with footballers (8.46 ± 0.50) and handball players (9.07 ± 0.60), respectively. Conclusion Sportsmen showed greater parasympathetic and global modulation when compared to sedentary people.","PeriodicalId":30574,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"114 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1752677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is a useful method for assessing the heart's ability to adapt to endogenous and exogenous loads. Data from African population on HRV are scarce and even more so in sports populations. This study aimed to compare cardiac autonomic modulation response in Cameroonian athletes and sedentary. Methodology. We conducted a prospective and analytical study in sports teams in the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon. The participants in our study were divided in three groups; people who practiced little or no sporting activity (sedentary as group 1) or who were regularly physically active as part of a sports team (footballers or handballers as second and third groups). They had to be aged 18 or over and have given their informed consent. Heart rate (HR) was continuously recorded at rest for ten minutes and then transferred to a computer equipped with Kubios HRV Standard software for analysis. Means ± mean standard errors were compared using the one-way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey's post-test. The significance threshold was set at 0.05. Results Of the 60 people selected to participate to our study, 75.0% were sportsmen (40.0% handball players and 35.0% footballers). The resting HR of sedentary people was higher (p < 0.001) than that of footballers and handball players. The SDNN, RMSSD, and pNN50 of sedentary people (16.22 ± 1.04; 9.97 ± 0.46; and 0.16 ± 0.06) were lower than those of footballers (30.13 ± 2.93; 20.61 ± 2.46; and 2.99 ± 0.63, with p < 0.001) and handball players (29.00 ± 1.86; 16.44 ± 1.16; and 2.15 ± 0.38, with p < 0.001 and p < 0.05 respectively). Absolute and relative very-low-frequency (VLF) power, absolute low and high-frequency (LF and HF) power, as well as total power (TP) were lower in sedentary people (3.66 ± 0.08 and 16.21 ± 0.64; 5.04 ± 0.15 and 2.50 ± 0.16 and 246.40 ± 18.04) compared to footballers (5.09 ± 0.24 and 26.87 ± 1.76; 5.85 ± 0.32 and 3.92 ± 0.22 and 836.10 ± 103.70, with p < 0.001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001) and handball players (4.86 ± 0.16 and 30.82 ± 2.67; 6.03 ± 0.19 and 3.46 ± 0.16 and 927.30 ± 94.12, with p < 0.001, p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001). The LF/HF ratio was 12.1% and 20.1% lower in sedentary people (7.55 ± 0.58) compared with footballers (8.46 ± 0.50) and handball players (9.07 ± 0.60), respectively. Conclusion Sportsmen showed greater parasympathetic and global modulation when compared to sedentary people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一组喀麦隆运动员的窦变异性分析
背景心率变异性(HRV)分析是评估心脏适应内源性和外源性负荷能力的有效方法。来自非洲人口的心率变异数据很少,在体育人口中更是如此。本研究旨在比较喀麦隆运动员和久坐者的心脏自律神经调节反应。研究方法。我们对喀麦隆雅温得市的运动队进行了一项前瞻性分析研究。参加研究的人员分为三组:很少或根本不参加体育活动的人(第一组为久坐不动者),或作为运动队成员经常参加体育活动的人(第二组和第三组为足球运动员或手球运动员)。他们必须年满 18 周岁,并在知情同意的情况下进行。连续记录休息时的心率(HR)十分钟,然后传输到装有 Kubios HRV Standard 软件的电脑上进行分析。用单向方差分析比较平均值和平均标准误差,然后进行 Tukey 后检验。显著性临界值设定为 0.05。结果 在被选中参与研究的 60 人中,75.0% 是运动员(40.0% 是手球运动员,35.0% 是足球运动员)。久坐者的静息心率高于足球运动员和手球运动员(P < 0.001)。久坐者的 SDNN、RMSSD 和 pNN50(16.22 ± 1.04;9.97 ± 0.46;0.16 ± 0.06)低于足球运动员(30.13 ± 2.93;20.61 ± 2.46;2.99 ± 0.63,p < 0.001)和手球运动员(29.00 ± 1.86;16.44 ± 1.16;2.15 ± 0.38,p < 0.001 和 p < 0.05)。与足球运动员(5.09 ± 0.24 和 26.87 ± 1.04)相比,久坐者的绝对和相对极低频(VLF)功率、绝对低频和高频(LF 和 HF)功率以及总功率(TP)较低(3.66 ± 0.08 和 16.21 ± 0.64;5.04 ± 0.15 和 2.50 ± 0.16 以及 246.40 ± 18.04)。24和26.87±1.76;5.85±0.32和3.92±0.22和836.10±103.70,P<0.001、P<0.01和P<0.001)和手球运动员(4.86±0.16和30.82±2.67;6.03±0.19和3.46±0.16和927.30±94.12,P<0.001、P<0.05、P<0.01和P<0.001)相比。与足球运动员(8.46 ± 0.50)和手球运动员(9.07 ± 0.60)相比,久坐者的 LF/HF 比率(7.55 ± 0.58)分别低 12.1%和 20.1%。结论 与久坐者相比,运动员的副交感神经和整体调节能力更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Sinus Variability in a Group of Cameroonian Athletes The 50 Most Cited Papers on Rugby since 2000 Reveal a Focus Primarily on Strength and Conditioning in Elite Male Players Exploring the Impact of a Global Pandemic (COVID-19) on Factors Impacting the Resilience of Top-Tier London Hockey Players. Anabolic-Androgenic Steroid Misuse: Mechanisms, Patterns of Misuse, User Typology, and Adverse Effects. A Comparative Study of Hematological Parameters of Endurance Runners at Guna Athletics Sport Club (3100 Meters above Sea Level) and Ethiopian Youth Sport Academy (2400 Meters above Sea Level), Ethiopia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1